Classical-Mechanics ยท Unit 13 ยท Video 8 ยท Interactive Practice

The Tyranny of the Logarithm: Why Rockets Stage and Burn Fast

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameWhat you need
vr,x,f=vr,x,i+ulnโกR,R=mr,imr,dv_{r,x,f} = v_{r,x,i} + u \ln R, \qquad R = \dfrac{m_{r,i}}{m_{r,d}}Rocket equation in free spaceExhaust speed uu and the mass ratio RR
mr(t)=mr,iโˆ’bโ€‰t,vr,x(t)=vr,x,i+ulnโกmr,imr,iโˆ’bโ€‰tm_r(t) = m_{r,i} - b\,t, \qquad v_{r,x}(t) = v_{r,x,i} + u \ln\dfrac{m_{r,i}}{m_{r,i} - b\,t}Constant burn rateThe ejection rate b=โˆ’โ€‰dmr/dtb = -\,dm_r/dt
vr,x,f=ulnโกR1+ulnโกR2=ulnโก(R1R2)v_{r,x,f} = u \ln R_1 + u \ln R_2 = u \ln (R_1 R_2)Two-stage burnEach stage ratio, measured after its own jettison
vr,x(tf)=ulnโกRโˆ’gโ€‰tfv_{r,x}(t_f) = u \ln R - g\,t_fVertical launch, constant ggBurn time tft_f

Key Insight: Speed adds, but mass ratio multiplies โ€” the logarithm turns a sum of stage gains into a product of stage ratios, and tft_f appears nowhere in the answer until gravity starts charging by the second.

IIThe Logarithmic Price of Speed

Each extra uu of speed costs another whole factor of ee in the mass ratio.

๐Ÿ’ก Structure sets the ceiling: tanks and engines can never weigh nothing, so a single stage cannot climb this curve indefinitely โ€” the only way further right is to stop carrying part of mr,dm_{r,d}.

IIIStaging โ€” Two Ratios Multiply

Same fuel, same uu: what does cutting the empty first-stage tank loose at 150ย s150\ \text{s} buy?

IVThe Gravity Tax

Gravity charges by the second: ulnโกRu \ln R is fixed, while gโ€‰tfg\,t_f grows with every second of burn.

๐Ÿ’ก Only the component of gโƒ—\vec{g} along the velocity is taxed, so a real launch pitches over as early as it can โ€” the full โˆ’gโ€‰tf-g\,t_f here is the worst case of a purely vertical climb.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 ยท Mass Ratio to Final Speed

Given: a probe at rest in deep space with total mass mr,i=6.0ร—105ย kgm_{r,i} = 6.0\times10^{5}\ \text{kg}, of which 4.8ร—105ย kg4.8\times10^{5}\ \text{kg} is propellant, ejected at u=2500ย m/su = 2500\ \text{m/s} โ€” find the final speed once the tanks are dry.

โœ… Correct! The dry mass is 1.2ร—105ย kg1.2\times10^{5}\ \text{kg}, so R=5R = 5 and vr,x,f=2500lnโก5=2500(1.6094)โ‰ˆ4020ย m/sv_{r,x,f} = 2500\ln 5 = 2500(1.6094) \approx 4020\ \text{m/s} โ€” a rocket that is 80%80\% propellant buys only 1.6โ€‰u1.6\,u.
โŒ That is uRuR, not ulnโกRu \ln R. Integrating dvr,x=โˆ’uโ€‰dmr/mrdv_{r,x} = -u\,dm_r/m_r produces a logarithm, so speed grows with lnโกR\ln R: five times the mass ratio is worth 1.609โ€‰u1.609\,u, not 5u5u.
โŒ Wrong logarithm. โˆซdmr/mr\int dm_r/m_r gives the natural log: lnโก5=1.609\ln 5 = 1.609, while logโก105=0.699\log_{10} 5 = 0.699.
โŒ The ratio is upside down. You evaluated ulnโก(mr,d/mr,i)u\ln(m_{r,d}/m_{r,i}); flipping the ratio inside a log flips the sign, and the rocket must speed up, so the larger mass goes on top.
Show solution

Step 1 โ€” dry mass. Everything except propellant:

mr,d=6.0ร—105โˆ’4.8ร—105=1.2ร—105ย kgm_{r,d} = 6.0\times10^{5} - 4.8\times10^{5} = 1.2\times10^{5}\ \text{kg}

Step 2 โ€” mass ratio.

R=mr,imr,d=6.0ร—1051.2ร—105=5.0R = \frac{m_{r,i}}{m_{r,d}} = \frac{6.0\times10^{5}}{1.2\times10^{5}} = 5.0

Step 3 โ€” rocket equation (starting from rest, vr,x,i=0v_{r,x,i} = 0):

vr,x,f=ulnโกR=(2500)(lnโก5)=(2500)(1.6094)=4023ย m/sv_{r,x,f} = u \ln R = (2500)(\ln 5) = (2500)(1.6094) = 4023\ \text{m/s}

Sanity check: mr,i>mr,dm_{r,i} > m_{r,d}, so R>1R > 1, so lnโกR>0\ln R > 0 and the rocket speeds up.

Problem 2 ยท Does the Burn Time Matter?

Given: two identical probes in free space, each starting from rest with identical propellant and identical uu. Probe A empties its tanks at a constant rate in 60ย s60\ \text{s}; probe B does so in 600ย s600\ \text{s} โ€” compare their final speeds.

โœ… Correct! The integration ran over mass, not time: ฮ”v=ulnโก(mr,i/mr,d)\Delta v = u\ln(m_{r,i}/m_{r,d}) contains no tt at all. In free space, burn time is invisible in the answer โ€” it only reappears through โˆ’gโ€‰tf-g\,t_f once there is a gravitational field.
โŒ Nothing in ulnโกRu \ln R scales with bb. Ten times the burn rate gives ten times the thrust for one tenth the time โ€” the accumulated โˆซuโ€‰dmr/mr\int u\,dm_r/m_r is identical.
โŒ Larger thrust, but for proportionally less time. A's acceleration is ten times bigger and lasts one tenth as long; both probes pass through exactly the same sequence of masses.
โŒ Longer, but ten times weaker. B's thrust ubub is one tenth of A's, so the extra 540ย s540\ \text{s} buys nothing: the same propellant leaves at the same uu.
Show solution

Separating variables gives one variable per side:

dvr,x=โˆ’uโ€‰dmrmrdv_{r,x} = -u\,\frac{dm_r}{m_r}

Integrating from ignition to burnout runs over mass, from mr,im_{r,i} to mr,dm_{r,d}:

vr,x,fโˆ’vr,x,i=ulnโกmr,imr,d=ulnโกRv_{r,x,f} - v_{r,x,i} = u\ln\frac{m_{r,i}}{m_{r,d}} = u\ln R

No time limit ever entered. With a constant burn rate bb the intermediate history does depend on bb,

vr,x(t)=ulnโกmr,imr,iโˆ’bโ€‰tv_{r,x}(t) = u\ln\frac{m_{r,i}}{m_{r,i} - b\,t}

but at burnout bโ€‰tf=mr,iโˆ’mr,db\,t_f = m_{r,i} - m_{r,d} for both probes, so both arrive at the same ulnโกRu \ln R. This is exactly why the 510ย s510\ \text{s} given in the video's single-stage example never appeared in the arithmetic.

Problem 3 ยท Two Stages, One Product

Given: a rocket at rest in free space with total mass 1.00ร—105ย kg1.00\times10^{5}\ \text{kg}. Stage one burns 6.0ร—104ย kg6.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg} of propellant, after which the empty stage-one structure (1.0ร—104ย kg1.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg}) is jettisoned; stage two then burns the remaining 2.0ร—104ย kg2.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg} of propellant. Both stages exhaust at u=3000ย m/su = 3000\ \text{m/s}.

What is the product R1R2R_1 R_2?

What is the final speed?

โœ… Correct! R1=2.5R_1 = 2.5 and R2=3.0R_2 = 3.0, so vr,x,f=3000lnโก7.5=6045ย m/sv_{r,x,f} = 3000\ln 7.5 = 6045\ \text{m/s} โ€” versus 3000lnโก5=4828ย m/s3000\ln 5 = 4828\ \text{m/s} if the same propellant were burned in one stage, a gain of about 1215ย m/s1215\ \text{m/s} from dropping 1.0ร—104ย kg1.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg} at the right moment.
โŒ That is the single-stage ratio. 5.0=1.00ร—105/2.0ร—1045.0 = 1.00\times10^{5} / 2.0\times10^{4} carries the empty stage-one structure all the way to burnout; jettisoning it removes that dead mass from stage two's denominator.
โŒ Ratios multiply, they do not add. Speeds add โ€” ulnโกR1+ulnโกR2u\ln R_1 + u\ln R_2 โ€” and the logarithm converts that sum into ulnโก(R1R2)u\ln(R_1R_2), a product.
โŒ Check the two ratios separately. R1R_1 uses the mass before and after the first burn; R2R_2 starts from the mass remaining after the jettison.
โŒ That is the no-jettison result. 3000lnโก5=4828ย m/s3000\ln 5 = 4828\ \text{m/s} is what this rocket gets if the empty stage-one structure rides along to the end.
โŒ You took ulnโก(R1+R2)u\ln(R_1 + R_2). The sum of the two speed gains is ulnโกR1+ulnโกR2=ulnโก(R1R2)u\ln R_1 + u\ln R_2 = u\ln(R_1R_2), so the ratios multiply inside the logarithm.
โŒ Not quite. Once you have the product R1R2R_1R_2, one logarithm finishes the job: vr,x,f=ulnโก(R1R2)v_{r,x,f} = u\ln(R_1R_2).
Show solution

Stage one. Burning 6.0ร—104ย kg6.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg} leaves

mr,1,d=1.00ร—105โˆ’6.0ร—104=4.0ร—104ย kg,R1=1.00ร—1054.0ร—104=2.5m_{r,1,d} = 1.00\times10^{5} - 6.0\times10^{4} = 4.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg}, \qquad R_1 = \frac{1.00\times10^{5}}{4.0\times10^{4}} = 2.5

Jettison. Dropping 1.0ร—104ย kg1.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg} of empty structure leaves mr,2,i=3.0ร—104ย kgm_{r,2,i} = 3.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg}.

Stage two. Burning the last 2.0ร—104ย kg2.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg} leaves

mr,2,d=3.0ร—104โˆ’2.0ร—104=1.0ร—104ย kg,R2=3.0ร—1041.0ร—104=3.0m_{r,2,d} = 3.0\times10^{4} - 2.0\times10^{4} = 1.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg}, \qquad R_2 = \frac{3.0\times10^{4}}{1.0\times10^{4}} = 3.0

Add the speeds, multiply the ratios.

vr,x,f=ulnโกR1+ulnโกR2=ulnโก(R1R2)=3000lnโก7.5=(3000)(2.0149)=6045ย m/sv_{r,x,f} = u\ln R_1 + u\ln R_2 = u\ln(R_1R_2) = 3000\ln 7.5 = (3000)(2.0149) = 6045\ \text{m/s}

Compare. One stage with the same 8.0ร—104ย kg8.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg} of propellant ends at mr,d=2.0ร—104ย kgm_{r,d} = 2.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg}, so R=5R = 5 and vr,x,f=3000lnโก5=4828ย m/sv_{r,x,f} = 3000\ln 5 = 4828\ \text{m/s}. The 1215ย m/s1215\ \text{m/s} difference is the price of accelerating 1.0ร—104ย kg1.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kg} of empty tank through the whole second burn.

Problem 4 ยท Burnout Speed Against Gravity

Given: a rocket rising vertically from rest through a constant field g=9.8ย m/s2g = 9.8\ \text{m/s}^2, with u=2600ย m/su = 2600\ \text{m/s}, mass ratio R=6.0R = 6.0, and a burn lasting tf=120ย st_f = 120\ \text{s} โ€” find the speed at burnout.

โœ… Correct! ulnโกR=2600(1.7918)=4659ย m/su\ln R = 2600(1.7918) = 4659\ \text{m/s} and gโ€‰tf=(9.8)(120)=1176ย m/sg\,t_f = (9.8)(120) = 1176\ \text{m/s}, leaving 3483ย m/s3483\ \text{m/s} โ€” gravity took a quarter of the prize in only two minutes.
โŒ That is the free-space answer. ulnโกR=4659ย m/su\ln R = 4659\ \text{m/s} is only the first term; standing in a field costs an extra โˆ’gโ€‰tf-g\,t_f.
โŒ Sign error. With +x+x upward the weight is โˆ’mr(t)g-m_r(t)g, so the gravity term subtracts: ulnโกRโˆ’gโ€‰tfu\ln R - g\,t_f.
โŒ The tax is not halved. โˆซ0tf(โˆ’g)โ€‰dtโ€ฒ=โˆ’gโ€‰tf\int_0^{t_f}(-g)\,dt' = -g\,t_f exactly; 12gโ€‰tf2\tfrac{1}{2}g\,t_f^2 is a displacement, not a speed.
โŒ Not quite. Evaluate the two terms separately: ulnโกRu\ln R first, then subtract gโ€‰tfg\,t_f.
Show solution

With +x+x upward, Fext,x=โˆ’mr(t)gF_{ext,x} = -m_r(t)g, and separating variables gives two independent pieces:

dvr,x=โˆ’gโ€‰dtโˆ’uโ€‰dmrmr(t)dv_{r,x} = -g\,dt - u\,\frac{dm_r}{m_r(t)}

Integrating from launch to burnout:

vr,x(tf)=ulnโกRโˆ’gโ€‰tfv_{r,x}(t_f) = u \ln R - g\,t_f

Term 1 (the prize):

ulnโกR=(2600)(lnโก6.0)=(2600)(1.7918)=4659ย m/su\ln R = (2600)(\ln 6.0) = (2600)(1.7918) = 4659\ \text{m/s}

Term 2 (the tax):

gโ€‰tf=(9.8)(120)=1176ย m/sg\,t_f = (9.8)(120) = 1176\ \text{m/s} vr,x(tf)=4659โˆ’1176=3483ย m/sv_{r,x}(t_f) = 4659 - 1176 = 3483\ \text{m/s}

Only the second term knows about time. Burning the same propellant in 60ย s60\ \text{s} instead would leave 4659โˆ’588=4071ย m/s4659 - 588 = 4071\ \text{m/s} โ€” the same mass ratio, 588ย m/s588\ \text{m/s} cheaper. That is the whole argument for a short, violent first stage.

Solved: 0 / 4