Classical-Mechanics ยท Unit 16 ยท Video 3 ยท Interactive Practice

Defining Potential Energy from Newton's Third Law

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameWhat you need
Fโƒ—2,1=โˆ’Fโƒ—1,2\vec{F}_{2,1} = -\vec{F}_{1,2}Newton's Third LawOne internal pair; the first index names the source, the second the receiver
Wc=โˆซABFโƒ—2,1โ‹…drโƒ—2,1W_c = \displaystyle\int_A^B \vec{F}_{2,1}\cdot d\vec{r}_{2,1}Two-body work, collapsedThe pair force and the relative displacement drโƒ—2,1=drโƒ—1โˆ’drโƒ—2d\vec{r}_{2,1} = d\vec{r}_1 - d\vec{r}_2 โ€” neither individual path
ฮ”Usysโ‰กโˆ’Wc\Delta U_{\text{sys}} \equiv -W_cChange in internal potential energyA conservative force, so the integral is path-independent and depends only on states AA and BB
ฮ”Ksys+ฮ”Usys=0\Delta K_{\text{sys}} + \Delta U_{\text{sys}} = 0The closed-system ledgerNo external work and no non-conservative internal forces

Key Insight: The work of an internal pair depends only on how the separation changes, so no share of UU can be handed to either object. Potential energy is a property of the interaction โ€” of the pair โ€” never of the book or of the earth alone.

IIVisualization 1 โ€” Two Work Integrals, One Relative Displacement

Each object collects its own work, yet the total depends only on how the separation changes.

๐Ÿ’ก Challenge: find a pair of moves that leaves the separation along the force line unchanged โ€” each object is worked on, yet Wc=0W_c = 0 and ฮ”Usys=0\Delta U_{\text{sys}} = 0.

IIIVisualization 2 โ€” Kinetic and Potential Energy Trade Exactly

Whatever kinetic energy the pair loses, its potential energy gains โ€” and a round trip zeroes both.

IVVisualization 3 โ€” One Effective Particle of Mass ฮผ\mu

The pair's relative motion obeys Fโƒ—2,1=ฮผโ€‰dvโƒ—2,1/dt\vec{F}_{2,1} = \mu\,d\vec{v}_{2,1}/dt โ€” a single particle of blended mass.

๐Ÿ’ก When m2โ‰ซm1m_2 \gg m_1 the reduced mass approaches m1m_1 and the heavy partner barely moves โ€” which is why lifting a book looks as though the book alone holds the energy.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 ยท Collapsing One Step

Given: Two objects interact through a single conservative internal force. Over one small step the force on object 1 due to object 2 is Fโƒ—2,1=(4ฤฑ^โˆ’3ศท^)ย N\vec{F}_{2,1} = (4\hat{\imath} - 3\hat{\jmath})\ \text{N}, object 1 moves through drโƒ—1=(0.5โ€‰ฤฑ^)ย md\vec{r}_1 = (0.5\,\hat{\imath})\ \text{m} and object 2 through drโƒ—2=(0.2โ€‰ฤฑ^+0.4โ€‰ศท^)ย md\vec{r}_2 = (0.2\,\hat{\imath} + 0.4\,\hat{\jmath})\ \text{m} โ€” find the work WcW_c done by the pair.

โœ… Correct! drโƒ—2,1=(0.3โ€‰ฤฑ^โˆ’0.4โ€‰ศท^)ย md\vec{r}_{2,1} = (0.3\,\hat{\imath} - 0.4\,\hat{\jmath})\ \text{m}, and one dot product with Fโƒ—2,1\vec{F}_{2,1} delivers both objects' work at once.
โŒ You added the displacements. Newton's Third Law puts a minus sign in front of the second integral: Fโƒ—1,2=โˆ’Fโƒ—2,1\vec{F}_{1,2} = -\vec{F}_{2,1}, so the two displacements subtract. Using drโƒ—1+drโƒ—2d\vec{r}_1 + d\vec{r}_2 gives 1.6ย J1.6\ \text{J}; the relative displacement is drโƒ—1โˆ’drโƒ—2d\vec{r}_1 - d\vec{r}_2.
โŒ That is object 1's share only. Fโƒ—2,1โ‹…drโƒ—1=2.0ย J\vec{F}_{2,1}\cdot d\vec{r}_1 = 2.0\ \text{J} is ฮ”K1\Delta K_1. Object 2 also has work done on it, Fโƒ—1,2โ‹…drโƒ—2=0.4ย J\vec{F}_{1,2}\cdot d\vec{r}_2 = 0.4\ \text{J}, and the pair's work is the sum.
โŒ That is ฮ”Usys\Delta U_{\text{sys}}, not WcW_c. The minus sign belongs to the definition ฮ”Usysโ‰กโˆ’Wc\Delta U_{\text{sys}} \equiv -W_c, not to the work integral itself.
โŒ Not quite. Build drโƒ—2,1=drโƒ—1โˆ’drโƒ—2d\vec{r}_{2,1} = d\vec{r}_1 - d\vec{r}_2 first, then take a single dot product with Fโƒ—2,1\vec{F}_{2,1}.
Show solution

Add the two work-energy statements and use the Third Law on the second one:

Wc=Fโƒ—2,1โ‹…drโƒ—1+Fโƒ—1,2โ‹…drโƒ—2=Fโƒ—2,1โ‹…drโƒ—1โˆ’Fโƒ—2,1โ‹…drโƒ—2=Fโƒ—2,1โ‹…(drโƒ—1โˆ’drโƒ—2)W_c = \vec{F}_{2,1}\cdot d\vec{r}_1 + \vec{F}_{1,2}\cdot d\vec{r}_2 = \vec{F}_{2,1}\cdot d\vec{r}_1 - \vec{F}_{2,1}\cdot d\vec{r}_2 = \vec{F}_{2,1}\cdot\big(d\vec{r}_1 - d\vec{r}_2\big)

The relative displacement is

drโƒ—2,1=drโƒ—1โˆ’drโƒ—2=(0.5โˆ’0.2)ฤฑ^+(0โˆ’0.4)ศท^=(0.3โ€‰ฤฑ^โˆ’0.4โ€‰ศท^)ย md\vec{r}_{2,1} = d\vec{r}_1 - d\vec{r}_2 = (0.5 - 0.2)\hat{\imath} + (0 - 0.4)\hat{\jmath} = (0.3\,\hat{\imath} - 0.4\,\hat{\jmath})\ \text{m}

so

Wc=(4)(0.3)+(โˆ’3)(โˆ’0.4)=1.2+1.2=2.4ย JW_c = (4)(0.3) + (-3)(-0.4) = 1.2 + 1.2 = 2.4\ \text{J}

Check the long way: Fโƒ—2,1โ‹…drโƒ—1=2.0ย J\vec{F}_{2,1}\cdot d\vec{r}_1 = 2.0\ \text{J} and Fโƒ—1,2โ‹…drโƒ—2=(โˆ’4)(0.2)+(3)(0.4)=0.4ย J\vec{F}_{1,2}\cdot d\vec{r}_2 = (-4)(0.2) + (3)(0.4) = 0.4\ \text{J}, and 2.0+0.4=2.4ย J2.0 + 0.4 = 2.4\ \text{J} โœ“. The collapsed form never needed the two separate paths.

Problem 2 ยท Carrying the Whole Pair

Given: Two objects interacting through a conservative internal force with Fโƒ—2,1=(5โ€‰ฤฑ^)ย N\vec{F}_{2,1} = (5\,\hat{\imath})\ \text{N} are each carried by external hands through the same displacement drโƒ—1=drโƒ—2=(2โ€‰ฤฑ^)ย md\vec{r}_1 = d\vec{r}_2 = (2\,\hat{\imath})\ \text{m}, so their separation never changes โ€” find ฮ”Usys\Delta U_{\text{sys}}.

โœ… Correct! The relative displacement is zero, so the pair's work is zero โ€” the +10ย J+10\ \text{J} delivered to object 1 is exactly the 10ย J10\ \text{J} taken from object 2.
โŒ You kept only one object's work. Each object does have work done on it, ยฑ10ย J\pm 10\ \text{J}, but the two terms are equal and opposite because Fโƒ—1,2=โˆ’Fโƒ—2,1\vec{F}_{1,2} = -\vec{F}_{2,1} acts through the same displacement.
โŒ The two works subtract, not add. Adding โˆฃW1โˆฃ+โˆฃW2โˆฃ|W_1| + |W_2| ignores the Third Law's minus sign โ€” the second term is โˆ’10ย J-10\ \text{J}, not +10ย J+10\ \text{J}.
โŒ Not quite. Compute drโƒ—2,1=drโƒ—1โˆ’drโƒ—2d\vec{r}_{2,1} = d\vec{r}_1 - d\vec{r}_2 before doing anything else.
Show solution

The relative displacement vanishes:

drโƒ—2,1=drโƒ—1โˆ’drโƒ—2=(2โ€‰ฤฑ^)โˆ’(2โ€‰ฤฑ^)=0โƒ—d\vec{r}_{2,1} = d\vec{r}_1 - d\vec{r}_2 = (2\,\hat{\imath}) - (2\,\hat{\imath}) = \vec{0}

Therefore

Wc=Fโƒ—2,1โ‹…drโƒ—2,1=0โŸนฮ”Usys=โˆ’Wc=0W_c = \vec{F}_{2,1}\cdot d\vec{r}_{2,1} = 0 \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad \Delta U_{\text{sys}} = -W_c = 0

Object by object: Fโƒ—2,1โ‹…drโƒ—1=(5)(2)=+10ย J\vec{F}_{2,1}\cdot d\vec{r}_1 = (5)(2) = +10\ \text{J} and Fโƒ—1,2โ‹…drโƒ—2=(โˆ’5)(2)=โˆ’10ย J\vec{F}_{1,2}\cdot d\vec{r}_2 = (-5)(2) = -10\ \text{J}; the pair transfers 10ย J10\ \text{J} from object 2 to object 1 and stores nothing.

The external hands may well change the system's kinetic energy, but ฮ”Usys\Delta U_{\text{sys}} answers only to the internal pair, and that force sees only the separation โ€” which never moved.

Problem 3 ยท Reduced Mass and the Ledger

Given: A closed system of m1=2.0ย kgm_1 = 2.0\ \text{kg} and m2=6.0ย kgm_2 = 6.0\ \text{kg} interacts only through one conservative internal force. Their relative speed grows from vA=1.0ย m/sv_A = 1.0\ \text{m/s} to vB=3.0ย m/sv_B = 3.0\ \text{m/s} โ€” find the reduced mass and ฮ”Usys\Delta U_{\text{sys}}.

What is the reduced mass?

What is the change in potential energy?

โœ… Correct! ฮผ=1.5ย kg\mu = 1.5\ \text{kg} gives Wc=ฮ”Ksys=+6.0ย JW_c = \Delta K_{\text{sys}} = +6.0\ \text{J}, so the interaction spent 6.0ย J6.0\ \text{J} of its stored energy.
โŒ That is the arithmetic mean. The reduced mass blends the reciprocals: 1/ฮผ=1/m1+1/m21/\mu = 1/m_1 + 1/m_2, so ฮผ\mu is always smaller than the lighter mass.
โŒ That is m1+m2m_1 + m_2. The sum is the denominator of ฮผ=m1m2/(m1+m2)\mu = m_1 m_2/(m_1+m_2), not the answer.
โŒ Check the combination. ฮผ=m1m2/(m1+m2)\mu = m_1 m_2/(m_1+m_2), and it can never exceed the smaller of the two masses.
โŒ Check the sign. The relative speed grew, so ฮ”Ksys>0\Delta K_{\text{sys}} > 0; since ฮ”Usys=โˆ’ฮ”Ksys\Delta U_{\text{sys}} = -\Delta K_{\text{sys}}, the potential energy must fall.
โŒ You squared the difference. The formula carries vB2โˆ’vA2=9โˆ’1=8ย m2/s2v_B^2 - v_A^2 = 9 - 1 = 8\ \text{m}^2/\text{s}^2, not (vBโˆ’vA)2=4ย m2/s2(v_B - v_A)^2 = 4\ \text{m}^2/\text{s}^2.
โŒ The factor 12\tfrac{1}{2} is missing. Wc=12ฮผ(vB2โˆ’vA2)W_c = \tfrac{1}{2}\mu(v_B^2 - v_A^2), exactly like K=12mv2K = \tfrac{1}{2}mv^2 for one particle.
โŒ Not quite. Compute Wc=12ฮผ(vB2โˆ’vA2)W_c = \tfrac{1}{2}\mu(v_B^2 - v_A^2) first, then negate it.
Show solution

Step 1 โ€” reduced mass. Subtracting the two Second-Law statements gives dvโƒ—2,1/dt=(1/m1+1/m2)Fโƒ—2,1d\vec{v}_{2,1}/dt = (1/m_1 + 1/m_2)\vec{F}_{2,1}, so the bracket is 1/ฮผ1/\mu:

ฮผ=m1m2m1+m2=(2.0)(6.0)2.0+6.0=128=1.5ย kg\mu = \frac{m_1 m_2}{m_1 + m_2} = \frac{(2.0)(6.0)}{2.0 + 6.0} = \frac{12}{8} = 1.5\ \text{kg}

Step 2 โ€” work from the relative speeds. With drโƒ—2,1=vโƒ—2,1โ€‰dtd\vec{r}_{2,1} = \vec{v}_{2,1}\,dt the integrand is an exact time derivative, and only the endpoints survive:

Wc=โˆซABฮผโ€‰dvโƒ—2,1dtโ‹…vโƒ—2,1โ€‰dt=12ฮผ(vB2โˆ’vA2)=12(1.5)(3.02โˆ’1.02)=12(1.5)(8.0)=6.0ย JW_c = \int_A^B \mu\,\frac{d\vec{v}_{2,1}}{dt}\cdot\vec{v}_{2,1}\,dt = \tfrac{1}{2}\mu\left(v_B^2 - v_A^2\right) = \tfrac{1}{2}(1.5)\big(3.0^2 - 1.0^2\big) = \tfrac{1}{2}(1.5)(8.0) = 6.0\ \text{J}

Step 3 โ€” the ledger. Wc=ฮ”Ksys=+6.0ย JW_c = \Delta K_{\text{sys}} = +6.0\ \text{J}, and by definition

ฮ”Usys=โˆ’Wc=โˆ’6.0ย J,ฮ”Ksys+ฮ”Usys=0ย โœ“\Delta U_{\text{sys}} = -W_c = -6.0\ \text{J}, \qquad \Delta K_{\text{sys}} + \Delta U_{\text{sys}} = 0\ \checkmark

Note that ฮผ=1.5ย kg\mu = 1.5\ \text{kg} is smaller than either mass โ€” the relative motion always responds like a particle lighter than both partners.

Problem 4 ยท Several Interactions, One Ledger

Given: A closed system of three objects has two conservative internal interactions and no non-conservative ones. Going from state AA to state BB, interaction 1 does Wc,1=+8.0ย JW_{c,1} = +8.0\ \text{J} and interaction 2 does Wc,2=โˆ’3.0ย JW_{c,2} = -3.0\ \text{J} โ€” find the two energy changes, then the result of a round trip back to AA.

From state A to state B

Now back from B to A by any route

โœ… Correct! Works add, so Wc=+5.0ย JW_c = +5.0\ \text{J} and the pair energies trade one for one; and because UU is a state quantity, returning to configuration AA restores it exactly.
โŒ The signs are swapped. Positive total work means the interactions released stored energy: ฮ”Usys=โˆ’Wc<0\Delta U_{\text{sys}} = -W_c < 0 while ฮ”Ksys=+Wc>0\Delta K_{\text{sys}} = +W_c > 0.
โŒ You added the magnitudes. Interaction 2 does negative work, so the total is 8.0โˆ’3.0=5.0ย J8.0 - 3.0 = 5.0\ \text{J}, not 8.0+3.08.0 + 3.0.
โŒ They cannot both fall. In a closed system with no non-conservative forces, ฮ”Ksys+ฮ”Usys=0\Delta K_{\text{sys}} + \Delta U_{\text{sys}} = 0 โ€” one rises exactly as much as the other falls.
โŒ Not quite. Add the works first: Wc=Wc,1+Wc,2W_c = W_{c,1} + W_{c,2}, then apply ฮ”Usys=โˆ’Wc=โˆ’ฮ”Ksys\Delta U_{\text{sys}} = -W_c = -\Delta K_{\text{sys}}.
โŒ Conservative forces have no memory of the route. Each ฮ”Usys,i\Delta U_{\text{sys},i} depends only on the initial and final states, so a closed excursion returns every term to its starting value.
โŒ Check what a round trip means. The final state is state AA, so every UU term ends where it began.
Show solution

Step 1 โ€” one term per interaction. Work is additive, so the potential energy changes add too:

ฮ”Usys=ฮ”Usys,1+ฮ”Usys,2=โˆ’Wc,1โˆ’Wc,2=โˆ’(8.0โˆ’3.0)=โˆ’5.0ย J\Delta U_{\text{sys}} = \Delta U_{\text{sys},1} + \Delta U_{\text{sys},2} = -W_{c,1} - W_{c,2} = -(8.0 - 3.0) = -5.0\ \text{J}

Step 2 โ€” the ledger. With no external work and no non-conservative internal forces,

ฮ”Ksys=Wc=+5.0ย J,ฮ”Ksys+ฮ”Usys=5.0โˆ’5.0=0ย โœ“\Delta K_{\text{sys}} = W_c = +5.0\ \text{J}, \qquad \Delta K_{\text{sys}} + \Delta U_{\text{sys}} = 5.0 - 5.0 = 0\ \checkmark

Step 3 โ€” the round trip. Each force is conservative, so its work around a closed path vanishes:

โˆฎFโƒ—c,iโ‹…drโƒ—i=0โŸนฮ”Usys=0andฮ”Ksys=0\oint \vec{F}_{c,i}\cdot d\vec{r}_i = 0 \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad \Delta U_{\text{sys}} = 0 \quad\text{and}\quad \Delta K_{\text{sys}} = 0

On the way back the interactions must do โˆ’5.0ย J-5.0\ \text{J} of work in total, cancelling the +5.0ย J+5.0\ \text{J} of the outbound leg โ€” the energy the system spent is handed back in full.

Solved: 0 / 4