Classical-Mechanics · Unit 17 · Video 5 · Interactive Practice
Dissipation and the System Boundary: Where Friction's Energy Goes
IKey Formulas
Formula
Name
What you need
∣Wfriction∣=fkd
Kinetic energy the sliding object loses (point-particle model)
The kinetic friction force and the sliding distance
ΔEthermal=ΔEthermalblock+ΔEthermalsurface=−ΔK
Dissipation inside the object + surface system
System boundary enclosing both bodies, Wext=0, ΔU=0
0=ΔEchemical+ΔEthermal+ΔEmechanical
Closed-system energy balance
A boundary with nothing crossing it
−ΔEchemical=ΔEthermal+ΔK
Source energy on level ground
ΔU=0: no springs, no change in height
Key Insight: Dissipation destroys nothing — it converts coherent molecular motion into random molecular motion in both bodies. Redrawing the boundary changes no physics, only the bookkeeping: outside the boundary friction is an external force acting at an ill-defined contact; inside it, friction is internal and the system's total energy is unchanged.
IIVisualization 1 — Coherent Motion Becomes Random Motion
The block's 18J does not vanish: follow it into the random motion of the molecules of both bodies.
💡 The conversion runs one way only: aligned molecular motion becomes random motion, but random molecular motion never spontaneously re-aligns into a 3.0m/s shove — which is exactly what makes a dissipative process irreversible.
IIIVisualization 2 — Where You Draw the Boundary
One skid, two boundaries: friction is external here and internal there, and only the bookkeeping changes.
1 · Friction is external
fk crosses the boundary, so the surroundings act on the system.
2 · The point-particle bookkeeping still works
∣Wfriction∣=fkd=(9.0)(2.0)=18J
which is the kinetic energy the object loses.
3 · Two difficulties
The contact point is not well defined — the surfaces deform continuously as the block creeps forward — and the dissipated energy lands partly in the block and partly in the floor, so the exact energy changes are undetermined without further material properties.
1 · Friction is internal
The equal-and-opposite pair acts entirely inside the boundary, and no external force does work.
2 · The ledger closes
Wext=0⇒ΔEsys=0ΔEthermal=−ΔK=+18J
3 · One question stays open
Mechanics fixes the total but not the branching ratio at the interface; splitting that 18J between block molecules and floor molecules takes a thermal equation of state.
IVVisualization 3 — The Walking Paradox
The planted foot never slides, so friction does no work — yet the walker's kinetic energy climbs.
💡 Any slippage of the planted foot points backward, opposite the motion, so slippage could only drain energy — it can never be the source of the walker's kinetic energy.
VQuiz Questions
Problem 1 · Following the Skid's Energy
Given: a 4.0kg block slides across a rough level floor at 3.0m/s and stops after d=2.0m against a kinetic friction force fk=9.0N, with the system taken to be the block and the floor — find the thermal energy generated, ΔEthermal.
✅ Correct! Both routes agree: fkd=18J and Ki=21mvi2=18J.
❌ That is 21fkd. The factor 21 belongs to a force that grows with displacement, like a spring; fk is constant over the whole skid.
❌ That is mvi2, not 21mvi2. Check it against the other route: fkd=(9.0)(2.0)=18J.
❌ Nothing was destroyed. The kinetic energy became random molecular kinetic energy in the block and the floor — both bodies end up warmer.
❌ Not quite. With friction internal to the system, ΔEsys=0, so ΔEthermal=−ΔK.
Show solution
With the boundary around block and floor, friction is an internal force and no external force does work, so the system's total energy is unchanged:
0=ΔEsys=ΔK+ΔEthermal
The block starts with
Ki=21mvi2=21(4.0)(3.0)2=18J
and ends at rest, so ΔK=−18J and
ΔEthermal=−ΔK=18J
The friction route gives the same number, which is why the block stops in exactly 2.0m: fkd=(9.0)(2.0)=18J.
Problem 2 · How the Thermal Energy Divides
Given: the same skid, in which 18J of thermal energy appears — find how much of it ends up in the block itself.
✅ Correct! Both bodies warm, and the total is fixed at 18J, but nothing in the mechanics fixes the branching ratio at the interface.
❌ Equal shares are a guess, not a result. A 50/50 split satisfies energy conservation — but so does every other split, which is exactly the point.
❌ The floor warms too. Run a hand along the skid mark: the surface molecules gained random kinetic energy as well.
❌ Friction acts on both bodies. The equal-and-opposite pair dissipates energy into the block and the floor at once.
❌ Not quite. Conservation of energy pins the total, not the share each body receives.
Show solution
Energy conservation for the block + floor system gives one equation for two unknowns:
ΔEthermalblock+ΔEthermalsurface=18J
Any pair of non-negative shares summing to 18J satisfies it. The dissipation happens right at the interface between the two parts, and mechanics alone does not say how the new thermal energy divides. Settling it requires an additional model — a thermal equation of state describing how the dissipated energy distributes itself among the constituent parts of the system, which depends on properties of the two materials.
Problem 3 · The Walker's Ledger
Given: a 60kg person starts from rest and reaches 1.5m/s on level ground while the body converts 270J of chemical energy; treat person + air + ground as a closed system with ΔU=0 — findΔK and ΔEthermal.
What is the change in kinetic energy?
What is the change in thermal energy?
✅ Correct! Of the 270J released, 67.5J became motion and the remaining 202.5J became heat in the body and the ground.
❌ You dropped the 21.mv2=135J; the kinetic energy is 21mv2.
❌ Check the kinetic energy. The person starts from rest, so ΔK=21mvf2−0 with m=60kg and vf=1.5m/s.
❌ That would leave nothing for the motion. The released energy splits: −ΔEchemical=ΔEthermal+ΔK.
❌ Sign slip.ΔK is subtracted from the released energy, not added to it: ΔEthermal=270−67.5.
❌ Check the thermal term. Rearrange the balance: ΔEthermal=−ΔEchemical−ΔK.
Show solution
For the closed system, no energy enters or leaves:
0=ΔEchemical+ΔEthermal+ΔEmechanical
Level ground and no springs give ΔEmechanical=ΔK, so moving the chemical term across:
−ΔEchemical=ΔEthermal+ΔK
Burning fuel makes ΔEchemical=−270J, so the energy released is −ΔEchemical=+270J. The kinetic term is
ΔK=21mvf2−21mvi2=21(60)(1.5)2−0=67.5J
and therefore
ΔEthermal=270−67.5=202.5J
The forward friction force from the ground never appears in this ledger: it does no work, because the planted foot's contact point undergoes no displacement. The source was internal all along.
Problem 4 · Pushed at Constant Speed
Given: you push the same 4.0kg box horizontally at constant speed for d=2.0m across the same floor (fk=9.0N), with the system taken to be the box and the floor and no heat flow, Q=0 — find the external work Wext and the thermal energy generated.
✅ Correct! Here the pusher pays the 18J instead of the box's own kinetic energy — the boundary now has an external force doing work across it.
❌ The energy has to land somewhere.ΔK=0 and ΔU=0, so the whole 18J that crossed the boundary shows up as thermal energy.
❌ Constant speed means ΔK=0, not zero work. Your force is 9.0N forward through 2.0m, so it does +18J on the system.
❌ You counted the friction force twice. At constant speed the applied force equalsfk=9.0N, it is not added to it.
❌ Not quite. Use the first law for the system: Wext+Q=ΔEsys=ΔK+ΔU+ΔEthermal.
Show solution
At constant speed the box has zero acceleration, so the applied force balances kinetic friction, F=fk=9.0N, and the surroundings do
Wext=Fd=(9.0)(2.0)=18J
on the system. The first law for the box + floor system, with Q=0, gives
Compare with Problem 1: the same 18J of thermal energy, but a different payer. There the boundary was closed and the box's own kinetic energy funded the heating; here energy crosses the boundary as external work and the kinetic energy never changes. As before, how the 18J divides between box and floor still needs a thermal model.