Classical-Mechanics · Unit 18 · Video 5 · Interactive Practice

Letting Go at Forty-Eight Degrees: When the Sphere Stops Pushing

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameWhat you need
Nmgcosθ=mv2RN - mg\cos\theta = -m\dfrac{v^2}{R}Radial component of Newton's Second LawOutward radial axis; the acceleration is centripetal, v2/Rv^2/R inward
N(θ1)=0N(\theta_1) = 0Loss-of-contact conditionA surface can push, but it can never pull
12mv2+mgRcosθ=mgR\tfrac{1}{2}mv^2 + mgR\cos\theta = mgRConservation of mechanical energy, U=0U = 0 at the centreFrictionless surface, released from rest at the top, WN=0W_N = 0
cosθ1=23,v1=2gR3\cos\theta_1 = \dfrac{2}{3}, \qquad v_1 = \sqrt{\dfrac{2gR}{3}}Separation angle and separation speedBoth equations imposed at the same instant

Key Insight: Eliminating v2v^2 between the two equations gives N(θ)=mg(3cosθ2)N(\theta) = mg\,(3\cos\theta - 2) — the normal force is a pure function of angle. Energy conservation alone can never locate its zero, because NN does no work and so never enters the energy equation at all.

IIVisualization 1 — The Push That Fades

Gravity's radial pull is spent two ways: the turn the object needs, and whatever the surface still supplies.

The top of the sphere is an unstable equilibrium, so the release nudge must be non-zero yet negligible; a genuinely finite starting speed moves the separation point up the sphere, as Problem 4 shows.

IIIVisualization 2 — Two Equations, One Crossing

Newton fixes the speed contact can survive; energy fixes the speed the fall delivers — they agree once.

IVVisualization 3 — The Angle Nothing Can Move

Mass, radius and gravity all set the speed at separation; none of them touches the angle.

The cancellation is a fact about spheres, not about domes in general: on a surface whose radius of curvature changes as the object descends, the separation angle changes with it.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 · Where Contact Breaks

Given: a small block is released from rest at the very top of a fixed, frictionless sphere of radius R=0.50 mR = 0.50\ \text{m}find the angle θ1\theta_1, measured from the vertical, at which the block leaves the surface.

✅ Correct! cosθ1=23\cos\theta_1 = \tfrac{2}{3} gives θ1=48.19°\theta_1 = 48.19\degree — and notice that R=0.50 mR = 0.50\ \text{m} never entered the calculation.
❌ That is the complement. 41.8°41.8\degree is the angle measured from the horizontal; θ\theta is measured from the vertical, and 90°41.8°=48.2°90\degree - 41.8\degree = 48.2\degree.
❌ Check the factor of 2. 12mv2=mgR(1cosθ)\tfrac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgR(1 - \cos\theta) gives v2=2gR(1cosθ)v^2 = 2gR(1 - \cos\theta); using v2=gR(1cosθ)v^2 = gR(1 - \cos\theta) instead yields cosθ1=12\cos\theta_1 = \tfrac{1}{2} and 60°60\degree.
❌ Not quite. Set N=0N = 0 in the radial equation to get gRcosθ1=v12gR\cos\theta_1 = v_1^2, then substitute v12=2gR(1cosθ1)v_1^2 = 2gR(1 - \cos\theta_1) from energy conservation.
Show solution

Step 1 — Radial component of Newton's Second Law (outward positive, acceleration centripetal):

Nmgcosθ=mv2RN - mg\cos\theta = -m\frac{v^2}{R}

At the instant of separation the surface has nothing left to give, N(θ1)=0N(\theta_1) = 0, so

mgRcosθ1=mv12mgR\cos\theta_1 = mv_1^2

Step 2 — Conservation of energy with U=0U = 0 at the centre of the sphere. Released from rest at the top, Ei=mgRE_i = mgR; at angle θ1\theta_1, Ef=12mv12+mgRcosθ1E_f = \tfrac{1}{2}mv_1^2 + mgR\cos\theta_1. The surface is frictionless and NN does no work, so Ef=EiE_f = E_i:

12mv12+mgRcosθ1=mgR\tfrac{1}{2}mv_1^2 + mgR\cos\theta_1 = mgR

Step 3 — Combine. Substituting mv12=mgRcosθ1mv_1^2 = mgR\cos\theta_1 into the kinetic term:

12mgRcosθ1+mgRcosθ1=mgR    32cosθ1=1\tfrac{1}{2}mgR\cos\theta_1 + mgR\cos\theta_1 = mgR \;\Longrightarrow\; \tfrac{3}{2}\cos\theta_1 = 1 cosθ1=23    θ1=cos1 ⁣(23)=48.19°\cos\theta_1 = \frac{2}{3} \;\Longrightarrow\; \theta_1 = \cos^{-1}\!\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) = 48.19\degree

Every term carried the same factor mgRmgR, so mm, gg and RR all cancelled: the radius given in the problem is a red herring.

Problem 2 · Why Energy Is Not Enough

Given: the block on the frictionless sphere, with mechanical energy perfectly conserved throughout the slide — identify why conservation of energy alone cannot locate the separation angle θ1\theta_1.

✅ Correct! Energy is blind to NN. The radial component of Newton's Second Law is the tool that can see it, and N(θ1)=0N(\theta_1) = 0 supplies the second equation — two equations for the two unknowns θ1\theta_1 and v1v_1.
NN does no work at all. The displacement is tangent to the sphere and N\vec{N} is radial, so Ndr=0\vec{N} \cdot d\vec{r} = 0 at every instant — the work is zero, not merely unknown.
❌ Mechanical energy is conserved here. The surface is frictionless, air resistance is neglected and WN=0W_N = 0, so Wnc=0W_{nc} = 0 and ΔEm=0\Delta E_m = 0. The energy equation is valid — it is just insufficient by itself.
❌ The mass is not the obstacle. mm is a common factor in every term and cancels; the missing information is the normal force, which the energy equation cannot contain.
Show solution

The normal force is perpendicular to the surface, and the block's displacement is tangent to it. Therefore

dWN=Ndr=0at every instant    WN=0dW_N = \vec{N} \cdot d\vec{r} = 0 \quad\text{at every instant}\;\Longrightarrow\; W_N = 0

so NN is absent from

12mv2+mgRcosθ=mgR\tfrac{1}{2}mv^2 + mgR\cos\theta = mgR

That single equation relates vv to θ\theta, but "loss of contact" is a statement about NN, which it cannot express. The radial component of Newton's Second Law does contain NN:

Nmgcosθ=mv2RN - mg\cos\theta = -m\frac{v^2}{R}

Eliminating v2v^2 between the two gives N(θ)=mg(3cosθ2)N(\theta) = mg\,(3\cos\theta - 2), and setting it to zero locates θ1\theta_1. Neither tool answers the question alone; together they pin down both unknowns at the single instant of separation.

Problem 3 · Halfway Down, Still Touching

Given: the same frictionless sphere with R=1.20 mR = 1.20\ \text{m} and g=9.8 m/s2g = 9.8\ \text{m/s}^2, the block released from rest at the top — find its speed and the normal force acting on it at θ=30°\theta = 30\degree, while it is still in contact.

Speed at 30 degrees

Normal force at 30 degrees

✅ Correct! The fall has delivered 1.78 m/s1.78\ \text{m/s}, and the surface is still pushing with about 60%60\% of the block's weight — contact is a long way from breaking.
❌ Check the energy step. The block drops R(1cos30°)R(1 - \cos 30\degree), so 12mv2=mgR(1cos30°)\tfrac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgR(1 - \cos 30\degree) with 1cos30°=0.1341 - \cos 30\degree = 0.134, giving v2=2(9.8)(1.20)(0.134)v^2 = 2(9.8)(1.20)(0.134).
❌ Check the radial equation. N=mgcosθmv2/RN = mg\cos\theta - m v^2/R, and here mv2/R=2mg(1cos30°)=0.268mgmv^2/R = 2mg(1 - \cos 30\degree) = 0.268\,mg — the centripetal demand, not the answer itself.
Show solution

Step 1 — Speed from energy conservation. The height above the centre falls from RR to RcosθR\cos\theta:

v2=2gR(1cosθ)=2(9.8)(1.20)(10.8660)=3.151 m2/s2v^2 = 2gR(1 - \cos\theta) = 2(9.8)(1.20)(1 - 0.8660) = 3.151\ \text{m}^2/\text{s}^2 v=1.78 m/sv = 1.78\ \text{m/s}

Step 2 — Normal force from the radial equation. With Nmgcosθ=mv2/RN - mg\cos\theta = -mv^2/R,

N=mgcosθmv2R=mgcosθ2mg(1cosθ)=mg(3cosθ2)N = mg\cos\theta - m\frac{v^2}{R} = mg\cos\theta - 2mg(1 - \cos\theta) = mg\,(3\cos\theta - 2) N=mg[3(0.8660)2]=0.598mgN = mg\,[3(0.8660) - 2] = 0.598\,mg

Check the budget. Gravity's radial pull is 0.866mg0.866\,mg; the turn consumes mv2/R=0.268mgmv^2/R = 0.268\,mg; the surface supplies the remaining 0.598mg0.598\,mg. The three numbers satisfy 0.866=0.268+0.5980.866 = 0.268 + 0.598, and NN reaches zero only when cosθ=23\cos\theta = \tfrac{2}{3}.

Problem 4 · A Push at the Top

Given: the same frictionless sphere, but the block is launched from the top with a small initial speed v0v_0 satisfying v02=13gRv_0^2 = \tfrac{1}{3}gR instead of being released from rest — find the new separation angle θ1\theta_1.

✅ Correct! cosθ1=23+v023gR=23+19=79\cos\theta_1 = \tfrac{2}{3} + \dfrac{v_0^2}{3gR} = \tfrac{2}{3} + \tfrac{1}{9} = \tfrac{7}{9}, so the extra speed pushes separation up the sphere, to 38.9°38.9\degree.
❌ The universal angle assumes release from rest. What cancelled was mgRmgR, not the initial kinetic energy: a non-zero v0v_0 adds v02/(3gR)v_0^2/(3gR) to cosθ1\cos\theta_1.
❌ Check the direction of the effect. Starting faster means the block reaches the critical speed v2=gRcosθv^2 = gR\cos\theta sooner — at a smaller θ\theta, nearer the top, not further down.
❌ Watch the factor of 2. Clearing the 12\tfrac{1}{2} from 12mv02\tfrac{1}{2}mv_0^2 doubles that term too: energy gives v2=v02+2gR(1cosθ)v^2 = v_0^2 + 2gR(1 - \cos\theta), not 12v02+2gR(1cosθ)\tfrac{1}{2}v_0^2 + 2gR(1 - \cos\theta).
❌ Not quite. Rebuild the energy equation with the extra initial kinetic energy, then set it equal to the N=0N = 0 requirement v2=gRcosθv^2 = gR\cos\theta.
Show solution

Step 1 — Energy with a head start. Ei=12mv02+mgRE_i = \tfrac{1}{2}mv_0^2 + mgR, and Ef=12mv2+mgRcosθE_f = \tfrac{1}{2}mv^2 + mgR\cos\theta. Setting Ef=EiE_f = E_i,

v2=v02+2gR(1cosθ)v^2 = v_0^2 + 2gR(1 - \cos\theta)

Step 2 — The separation condition is unchanged. N=0N = 0 still requires v12=gRcosθ1v_1^2 = gR\cos\theta_1. Substituting,

gRcosθ1=v02+2gR2gRcosθ1    3gRcosθ1=2gR+v02gR\cos\theta_1 = v_0^2 + 2gR - 2gR\cos\theta_1 \;\Longrightarrow\; 3gR\cos\theta_1 = 2gR + v_0^2 cosθ1=23+v023gR\cos\theta_1 = \frac{2}{3} + \frac{v_0^2}{3gR}

Step 3 — Substitute v02=13gRv_0^2 = \tfrac{1}{3}gR:

cosθ1=23+19=79=0.7778    θ1=38.9°\cos\theta_1 = \frac{2}{3} + \frac{1}{9} = \frac{7}{9} = 0.7778 \;\Longrightarrow\; \theta_1 = 38.9\degree

Setting v0=0v_0 = 0 recovers cosθ1=23\cos\theta_1 = \tfrac{2}{3}, so the familiar 48.2°48.2\degree is the largest possible separation angle for this sphere: any head start only makes the block let go sooner.

Solved: 0 / 4