Classical-Mechanics Β· Unit 19 Β· Video 2 Β· Interactive Practice

Elastic, Inelastic, Superelastic: Classifying Collisions and Solving the One-Dimensional Elastic Case

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameWhat you need
e=vBvAe = \dfrac{v_B}{v_A}Coefficient of restitutionThe relative speed after and before; both are frame-independent, so every inertial observer measures the same ee
Ξ”K=12ΞΌvA2(e2βˆ’1)\Delta K = \tfrac{1}{2}\mu v_A^2\left(e^2 - 1\right)Kinetic energy changeThe reduced mass 1ΞΌ=1m1+1m2\dfrac{1}{\mu} = \dfrac{1}{m_1} + \dfrac{1}{m_2} and the approach speed vAv_A
vβƒ—i rel=βˆ’vβƒ—f rel\vec{v}^{\,\text{rel}}_i = -\vec{v}^{\,\text{rel}}_fOne-dimensional energy–momentum principleA head-on elastic collision β€” and nothing else: no mass appears
v1x,f=m1βˆ’m2m1+m2 v1x,i+2m2m1+m2 v2x,iv_{1x,f} = \dfrac{m_1 - m_2}{m_1 + m_2}\,v_{1x,i} + \dfrac{2m_2}{m_1 + m_2}\,v_{2x,i}Final velocities, elastic collisionBoth masses and both initial xx-components; swap the labels 1↔21 \leftrightarrow 2 to get v2x,fv_{2x,f}

Key Insight: Factoring the energy equation as a difference of squares makes each side contain the corresponding side of the momentum equation, m1 ⁣(v1x,iβˆ’v1x,f)=m2 ⁣(v2x,fβˆ’v2x,i)m_1\!\left(v_{1x,i} - v_{1x,f}\right) = m_2\!\left(v_{2x,f} - v_{2x,i}\right). Dividing one equation by the other cancels those factors β€” and with them both masses β€” leaving v1x,i+v1x,f=v2x,i+v2x,fv_{1x,i} + v_{1x,f} = v_{2x,i} + v_{2x,f}, which is the reversal of the relative velocity. The four labels classify Ξ”K\Delta K alone; momentum is conserved in every one of them.

IIVisualization 1 β€” One Ratio Sorts Every Collision

The ratio of relative speeds after and before decides the sign of Ξ”K\Delta K β€” and nothing else does.

A superelastic collision creates nothing: a latch, a compressed spring or a chemical charge releases energy that was already stored inside the system.

IIIVisualization 2 β€” The Relative Velocity Turns Around

An elastic head-on collision returns the same approach speed, whatever the two initial velocities are.

The same two conservation equations also admit the root v1x,f=v1x,iv_{1x,f} = v_{1x,i}, v2x,f=v2x,iv_{2x,f} = v_{2x,i} β€” no collision at all β€” which the division by m1 ⁣(v1x,iβˆ’v1x,f)m_1\!\left(v_{1x,i} - v_{1x,f}\right) quietly discards.

IVVisualization 3 β€” What the Mass Ratio Decides

The mass ratio moves both final velocities, but never the gap between them.

Both first-order corrections are the same size: at m1/m2=100m_1/m_2 = 100 the tempting shortcut v1x,fβ‰ˆv1x,i+2m2m1v2x,iv_{1x,f} \approx v_{1x,i} + \tfrac{2m_2}{m_1}v_{2x,i} gives 9.90Β m/s9.90\ \text{m/s} β€” a change of only βˆ’0.10Β m/s-0.10\ \text{m/s}, one third of the true βˆ’0.30Β m/s-0.30\ \text{m/s}.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 Β· Sorting a Collision

Given: two carts approach with relative speed vA=8.0Β m/sv_A = 8.0\ \text{m/s} and separate with relative speed vB=6.0Β m/sv_B = 6.0\ \text{m/s}; their reduced mass is ΞΌ=1.2Β kg\mu = 1.2\ \text{kg} β€” find Ξ”K\Delta K.

βœ… Correct! e=6.0/8.0=0.75<1e = 6.0/8.0 = 0.75 < 1, so the collision is inelastic and e2βˆ’1=βˆ’0.4375e^2 - 1 = -0.4375 makes Ξ”K\Delta K negative.
❌ Not quite. That is the value for e=0e = 0 β€” the totally inelastic case, where the carts leave stuck together. Here they separate at 6.0Β m/s6.0\ \text{m/s}.
❌ Not quite. Ξ”K\Delta K is not 12ΞΌ(vAβˆ’vB)2\tfrac{1}{2}\mu(v_A - v_B)^2: the two relative speeds enter squared and separately, as 12ΞΌ(vB2βˆ’vA2)\tfrac{1}{2}\mu\left(v_B^2 - v_A^2\right).
❌ Check the sign. The magnitude is right, but e<1e < 1 forces e2βˆ’1<0e^2 - 1 < 0: an inelastic collision loses kinetic energy.
Show solution

Step 1 β€” the coefficient of restitution:

e=vBvA=6.08.0=0.75e = \frac{v_B}{v_A} = \frac{6.0}{8.0} = 0.75

Since 0<e<10 < e < 1, this is an inelastic collision.

Step 2 β€” the energy change:

Ξ”K=12ΞΌvA2(e2βˆ’1)=12(1.2)(8.0)2(0.5625βˆ’1)=38.4 (βˆ’0.4375)=βˆ’16.8Β J\Delta K = \tfrac{1}{2}\mu v_A^2\left(e^2 - 1\right) = \tfrac{1}{2}(1.2)(8.0)^2\left(0.5625 - 1\right) = 38.4\,(-0.4375) = -16.8\ \text{J}

Check with the equivalent form Ξ”K=12ΞΌ(vB2βˆ’vA2)=0.6 (36βˆ’64)=βˆ’16.8Β J\Delta K = \tfrac{1}{2}\mu\left(v_B^2 - v_A^2\right) = 0.6\,(36 - 64) = -16.8\ \text{J} βœ“

Problem 2 Β· A Latch Lets Go

Given: two carts collide with a compressed spring latched between them, and the latch releases during contact. They approach at vA=3.0Β m/sv_A = 3.0\ \text{m/s} and separate at vB=4.5Β m/sv_B = 4.5\ \text{m/s}, with no external force along the track β€” which statement is correct?

βœ… Correct! e=4.5/3.0=1.5e = 4.5/3.0 = 1.5 gives e2βˆ’1=1.25>0e^2 - 1 = 1.25 > 0. The spring's stored elastic energy became kinetic energy, and with no external force the momentum is untouched.
❌ Not quite. e=1.5e = 1.5 is right, but nothing is created: the energy was already stored in the compressed spring. Energy conservation holds β€” only the kinetic share grew.
❌ Not quite. Momentum conservation follows from the absence of an external force, not from the energy budget. It holds in all four categories β€” elastic, inelastic, totally inelastic and superelastic.
❌ The ratio is upside down. e=vB/vAe = v_B/v_A is after over before: 4.5/3.0=1.54.5/3.0 = 1.5, not 3.0/4.53.0/4.5.
Show solution

Step 1 β€” classify by ee:

e=vBvA=4.53.0=1.5>1β‡’superelastice = \frac{v_B}{v_A} = \frac{4.5}{3.0} = 1.5 > 1 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \text{superelastic}

Step 2 β€” the sign of the energy change:

Ξ”K=12ΞΌvA2(e2βˆ’1)=12ΞΌ(3.0)2(2.25βˆ’1)=+12ΞΌvA2(1.25)>0\Delta K = \tfrac{1}{2}\mu v_A^2\left(e^2 - 1\right) = \tfrac{1}{2}\mu (3.0)^2 (2.25 - 1) = +\tfrac{1}{2}\mu v_A^2 (1.25) > 0

Step 3 β€” the two cautions:

  • The kinetic energy gained came from the spring's stored elastic potential energy. A superelastic collision releases internal energy; it never creates energy.
  • Momentum is conserved whenever no external force acts, in all four categories. The label ee assigns describes Ξ”K\Delta K only.

Problem 3 Β· Both Final Velocities

Given: m1=3.0Β kgm_1 = 3.0\ \text{kg} with v1x,i=+6.0Β m/sv_{1x,i} = +6.0\ \text{m/s} collides head-on and elastically with m2=1.0Β kgm_2 = 1.0\ \text{kg} with v2x,i=βˆ’2.0Β m/sv_{2x,i} = -2.0\ \text{m/s} β€” find both final xx-components.

What is v1x,fv_{1x,f}?

What is v2x,fv_{2x,f}?

βœ… Correct! Momentum: 18βˆ’2=6+1018 - 2 = 6 + 10 βœ“. Energy: 54+2=6+5054 + 2 = 6 + 50 βœ“. And the relative velocity flips from +8.0+8.0 to βˆ’8.0Β m/s-8.0\ \text{m/s} βœ“.
❌ Check v1x,fv_{1x,f}. Both coefficients here equal 12\tfrac{1}{2}: m1βˆ’m2m1+m2=24\dfrac{m_1 - m_2}{m_1 + m_2} = \dfrac{2}{4} and 2m2m1+m2=24\dfrac{2m_2}{m_1 + m_2} = \dfrac{2}{4}. Keep both terms, and keep the sign of v2x,iv_{2x,i}.
❌ Check v2x,fv_{2x,f}. Swapping the labels gives m2βˆ’m1m1+m2=βˆ’12\dfrac{m_2 - m_1}{m_1 + m_2} = -\tfrac{1}{2} and 2m1m1+m2=32\dfrac{2m_1}{m_1 + m_2} = \tfrac{3}{2}. Velocities are exchanged outright only when m1=m2m_1 = m_2.
Show solution

With m1+m2=4.0Β kgm_1 + m_2 = 4.0\ \text{kg}:

v1x,f=m1βˆ’m2m1+m2 v1x,i+2m2m1+m2 v2x,i=12(6.0)+12(βˆ’2.0)=3.0βˆ’1.0=+2.0Β m/sv_{1x,f} = \frac{m_1 - m_2}{m_1 + m_2}\,v_{1x,i} + \frac{2m_2}{m_1 + m_2}\,v_{2x,i} = \tfrac{1}{2}(6.0) + \tfrac{1}{2}(-2.0) = 3.0 - 1.0 = +2.0\ \text{m/s} v2x,f=m2βˆ’m1m1+m2 v2x,i+2m1m1+m2 v1x,i=βˆ’12(βˆ’2.0)+32(6.0)=1.0+9.0=+10.0Β m/sv_{2x,f} = \frac{m_2 - m_1}{m_1 + m_2}\,v_{2x,i} + \frac{2m_1}{m_1 + m_2}\,v_{1x,i} = -\tfrac{1}{2}(-2.0) + \tfrac{3}{2}(6.0) = 1.0 + 9.0 = +10.0\ \text{m/s}

Three checks:

  • Momentum: 3.0(6.0)+1.0(βˆ’2.0)=163.0(6.0) + 1.0(-2.0) = 16 and 3.0(2.0)+1.0(10.0)=163.0(2.0) + 1.0(10.0) = 16 βœ“
  • Kinetic energy: 54+2=56Β J54 + 2 = 56\ \text{J} and 6+50=56Β J6 + 50 = 56\ \text{J} βœ“
  • Energy–momentum principle: v1x,iβˆ’v2x,i=8.0v_{1x,i} - v_{2x,i} = 8.0 and v1x,fβˆ’v2x,f=βˆ’8.0v_{1x,f} - v_{2x,f} = -8.0 βœ“

Problem 4 Β· Paddle and Ping-Pong Ball

Given: a paddle of mass m1=200Β gm_1 = 200\ \text{g} moving at v1x,i=+6.0Β m/sv_{1x,i} = +6.0\ \text{m/s} meets a ball of mass m2=2.0Β gm_2 = 2.0\ \text{g} moving at v2x,i=βˆ’4.0Β m/sv_{2x,i} = -4.0\ \text{m/s}, head-on and elastically β€” use the limit m1≫m2m_1 \gg m_2, to first order in m2/m1=0.010m_2/m_1 = 0.010.

The ball's final velocity v2x,fv_{2x,f}?

The paddle's velocity change Ξ”v1x=v1x,fβˆ’v1x,i\Delta v_{1x} = v_{1x,f} - v_{1x,i}?

βœ… Correct! The ball leaves the paddle at the approach speed 10Β m/s10\ \text{m/s}, so v2x,fβ†’v1x,i+10=16Β m/sv_{2x,f} \to v_{1x,i} + 10 = 16\ \text{m/s}; the paddle pays for it with Ξ”v1x=2m2m1(v2x,iβˆ’v1x,i)=0.020(βˆ’10)=βˆ’0.20Β m/s\Delta v_{1x} = \tfrac{2m_2}{m_1}\left(v_{2x,i} - v_{1x,i}\right) = 0.020(-10) = -0.20\ \text{m/s}.
❌ Not quite. The ball would simply reverse only off a paddle at rest. Here the paddle is advancing, and it is the relative velocity that reverses.
❌ Not quite. Leaving at the paddle's own speed is the totally inelastic outcome (e=0e = 0), where the two move off together. An elastic bounce sends the ball away faster than the paddle.
❌ Close β€” that is the approach speed. v1x,iβˆ’v2x,i=10Β m/sv_{1x,i} - v_{2x,i} = 10\ \text{m/s} is the speed of the ball relative to the paddle. Add the paddle's own +6.0Β m/s+6.0\ \text{m/s} to get its velocity in the lab frame.
❌ Check the paddle. Both first-order pieces, 2m2m1v2x,i\tfrac{2m_2}{m_1}v_{2x,i} and βˆ’2m2m1v1x,i-\tfrac{2m_2}{m_1}v_{1x,i}, are the same order in m2/m1m_2/m_1 β€” keeping only one of them is wrong.
Show solution

The ball, in the limit m1≫m2m_1 \gg m_2. The coefficients of v2x,fv_{2x,f} tend to m2βˆ’m1m1+m2β†’βˆ’1\dfrac{m_2 - m_1}{m_1 + m_2} \to -1 and 2m1m1+m2β†’2\dfrac{2m_1}{m_1 + m_2} \to 2, so

v2x,fβ†’βˆ’v2x,i+2v1x,i=v1x,i+(v1x,iβˆ’v2x,i)=6.0+10.0=+16Β m/sv_{2x,f} \to -v_{2x,i} + 2v_{1x,i} = v_{1x,i} + \left(v_{1x,i} - v_{2x,i}\right) = 6.0 + 10.0 = +16\ \text{m/s}

Equivalently v2x,fβˆ’v1x,i=vx,irelv_{2x,f} - v_{1x,i} = v^{\text{rel}}_{x,i}: the ball leaves the paddle at exactly the speed it approached it with.

The paddle, to first order. Expanding both coefficients of v1x,fv_{1x,f} in m2/m1m_2/m_1 gives m1βˆ’m2m1+m2β‰ˆ1βˆ’2m2m1\dfrac{m_1 - m_2}{m_1 + m_2} \approx 1 - \dfrac{2m_2}{m_1} and 2m2m1+m2β‰ˆ2m2m1\dfrac{2m_2}{m_1 + m_2} \approx \dfrac{2m_2}{m_1}, so

v1x,fβ‰ˆv1x,i+2m2m1(v2x,iβˆ’v1x,i)=6.0+0.020 (βˆ’10.0)=5.80Β m/sv_{1x,f} \approx v_{1x,i} + \frac{2m_2}{m_1}\left(v_{2x,i} - v_{1x,i}\right) = 6.0 + 0.020\,(-10.0) = 5.80\ \text{m/s} Ξ”v1xβ‰ˆβˆ’0.20Β m/s\Delta v_{1x} \approx -0.20\ \text{m/s}

Compare with the exact formulas (m1+m2=0.202Β kgm_1 + m_2 = 0.202\ \text{kg}):

v1x,f=0.1980.202(6.0)+0.0040.202(βˆ’4.0)=5.802Β m/s,v2x,f=βˆ’0.1980.202(βˆ’4.0)+0.4000.202(6.0)=15.802Β m/sv_{1x,f} = \frac{0.198}{0.202}(6.0) + \frac{0.004}{0.202}(-4.0) = 5.802\ \text{m/s}, \qquad v_{2x,f} = \frac{-0.198}{0.202}(-4.0) + \frac{0.400}{0.202}(6.0) = 15.802\ \text{m/s}

Their difference is 5.802βˆ’15.802=βˆ’10.0Β m/s5.802 - 15.802 = -10.0\ \text{m/s}, exactly the reverse of the initial +10.0Β m/s+10.0\ \text{m/s} βœ“

The tempting shortcut. Keeping only 2m2m1v2x,i=0.020(βˆ’4.0)=βˆ’0.08Β m/s\tfrac{2m_2}{m_1}v_{2x,i} = 0.020(-4.0) = -0.08\ \text{m/s} discards the βˆ’2m2m1v1x,i-\tfrac{2m_2}{m_1}v_{1x,i} term and understates the paddle's change by more than half.

Solved: 0 / 4