Classical-Mechanics · Unit 20 · Video 4 · Interactive Practice
Moment of Inertia of a Disc and the Parallel Axis Theorem
IKey Formulas
Formula
Name
What you need
σ=πR2M,dm=σrdrdθ
Polar mass element
A uniform disc; the patch of area rdrdθ sits at perpendicular distance r from the axle
Icm=πR2M∫0R∫02πr3dθdr=21MR2
Uniform disc about its centre
Mass and radius; a thin hoop of the same M and R has the full MR2
IS=Icm+mdS,cm2
Parallel axis theorem
The centre-of-mass moment and the perpendicular separation dS,cm of the two axes
Iend=31mL2=4Icm,Iedge=23MR2
The two worked results
Rod about a perpendicular axis through one end; disc about a perpendicular axis through its rim
Key Insight:mdS,cm2 is never negative, so of all parallel axes the one through the centre of mass gives the smallest moment of inertia — and since the theorem connects an axis only to that one, moving from S to S′ means subtracting mdS,cm2 and then adding mdS′,cm2.
IIVisualization 1 — Building the Disc Ring by Ring
The mass inside radius a grows like a2, but the moment of inertia it carries grows like a4.
IIIVisualization 2 — Sliding the Axis off the Centre
Every parallel axis costs Md2 more than the axis through the centre of mass.
💡 The theorem links an axis to the centre-of-mass axis and to no other: to go from S straight to a second displaced axis S′, subtract mdS,cm2 first and then add mdS′,cm2.
IVVisualization 3 — The Rod About Its End, Two Ways
The axis through the end of the rod: once by the theorem, once by a fresh integral.
Step 1 — The centre-of-mass axis
Icm=λ∫−L/2L/2x2dx=Lm⋅12L3=121mL2
The shaded area is I/λ: the rod is only ever L/2 from this axis.
Step 2 — Move the axis to the end
dS,cm=2L
Iend=121mL2+m(2L)2=121mL2+123mL2=31mL2
Step 3 — The same result by integration
x′=x+2L,0≤x′≤L
Iend=λ∫0L(x′)2dx′=Lm⋅3L3=31mL2
Step 4 — Four times the centre-of-mass value
IcmIend=121mL231mL2=4
One addition, or a second integral with new limits — the same number either way.
VQuiz Questions
Problem 1 · Disc, Axis Halfway to the Rim
Given: a uniform disc of mass M and radius R has Icm=21MR2 about the perpendicular axis through its centre; it is remounted on a parallel axle through the point halfway from the centre to the rim — findIS.
✅ Correct! With dS,cm=R/2 the theorem adds M(R/2)2=41MR2 to 21MR2.
❌ That is only the added term.Md2 is what the shift adds to Icm; it does not replace it.
❌ That is the value about the centre. The new axis is a distance R/2 away, and every displaced axis costs an extra Md2.
❌ That is the rim value. Halfway out means d=R/2, so d2=R2/4, not R2.
❌ Not quite. Use IS=Icm+Md2 with d=R/2.
Show solution
The axis separation is half the radius:
dS,cm=2R⟹MdS,cm2=M(2R)2=41MR2
The parallel axis theorem adds that to the centre-of-mass value:
IS=21MR2+41MR2=43MR2
Between the centre value 21MR2 and the rim value 23MR2, as it must be — the added term grows with d2, so halfway out costs only a quarter of what the rim costs.
Problem 2 · Rod, a Quarter of the Way In
Given: a uniform rod of mass m and length L has Icm=121mL2 about the perpendicular axis through its centre and Iend=31mL2 about the parallel axis through one end; a perpendicular axis is now placed through the point a distance L/4 from that end — find the moment of inertia about it.
✅ Correct! The new axis is L/2−L/4=L/4 from the centre of mass, so 121mL2+161mL2=487mL2.
❌ The theorem was started from the wrong axis.IS=Icm+md2 measures d from the centre-of-mass axis; adding m(L/4)2 to Iend has no meaning.
❌ Subtracting from Iend does not work either. To leave the end axis you must subtract the separation it already carries, m(L/2)2, which returns you to Icm — then add m(L/4)2.
❌ Check which distance matters. The separation is measured to the centre of mass, and the point sits L/4 from the near end, hence L/4 from the middle — not 3L/4.
❌ Not quite. Locate the new axis relative to the centre of mass first, then add md2 to 121mL2.
Show solution
Step 1: find the separation from the centre-of-mass axis. The centre of mass is at the midpoint, L/2 from either end, and the new axis is L/4 from one end:
dS,cm=2L−4L=4L
Step 2: apply the theorem from the centre-of-mass value.
Why Iend is the wrong starting point: the theorem holds only between an arbitrary axis and the parallel axis through the centre of mass. Starting at the end axis, the legal route is
which passes through Icm=484mL2 on the way and gives the same answer.
Problem 3 · Disc Spinning About Its Rim
Given: the uniform disc of mass M and radius R (Icm=21MR2) spins with angular speed ω about a perpendicular axis through a point on its rim — find its moment of inertia about that axis and its kinetic energy.
Moment of inertia about the rim axis?
Kinetic energy at angular speed ω?
✅ Correct!Iedge=23MR2 and K=21Iedgeω2=43MR2ω2 — three times the 41MR2ω2 the same disc has about its centre at the same ω.
❌ Check the added term. The rim is a distance d=R from the centre of mass, so the theorem adds a full MR2 to 21MR2.
❌ Check the energy.K=21Iω2 must use the moment of inertia about the rotation axis, and that factor of 21 is easy to drop.
Show solution
Step 1: the moment of inertia about the rim axis. The separation between the rim axis and the parallel axis through the centre is the radius, dS,cm=R:
Iedge=Icm+MR2=21MR2+MR2=23MR2
Step 2: the kinetic energy uses the moment about the rotation axis.
K=21Iedgeω2=21⋅23MR2ω2=43MR2ω2
Compare the centre axis at the same ω:
Kcm=21⋅21MR2ω2=41MR2ω2
The added term MR2 is by itself twice Icm, so spinning about the rim stores three times the energy at the same angular speed.
Problem 4 · Hoop Against Disc, Both About the Rim
Given: a thin hoop and a uniform disc share the same mass M and radius R, with Icmhoop=MR2 and Icmdisc=21MR2; each spins at the same angular speed ω about a perpendicular axis through a point on its own rim — find the ratio Khoop/Kdisc.
✅ Correct! Both bodies gain the same MR2, so the ratio 2MR2:23MR2=34 is closer to 1 than the 2:1 of their centre-of-mass values.
❌ That ratio is upside down. The hoop has the larger moment of inertia about either axis, so at equal ω it must have the larger kinetic energy.
❌ That is the ratio about the centres. Both axes were moved to the rim, and the identical MR2 each one gains shrinks the ratio.
❌ The hoop needs the theorem too.MR2 is the hoop about its centre; about a rim axis it is MR2+MR2=2MR2.
❌ Not quite. Apply IS=Icm+MR2 to each body, then take the ratio — the equal ω and the factor 21 cancel.
Show solution
Step 1: move each axis to the rim. The separation is dS,cm=R in both cases:
Step 2: take the ratio of the energies. With the same ω, the factor 21ω2 cancels:
KdiscKhoop=21(23MR2)ω221(2MR2)ω2=232=34
What the theorem did to the comparison: about their centres the hoop beats the disc 2:1, because the disc keeps mass in near the axle. Displacing both axes by the same R adds the same MR2 to each, and adding equal amounts to two unequal numbers pushes their ratio toward 1 — here from 2 down to 34.