Classical-Mechanics ยท Unit 25 ยท Video 1 ยท Interactive Practice

Torque About the Center of Mass: The Orbital and Spin Equations of Motion

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameWhat it says
Fโƒ—โ€‰ext=ddt(mTVโƒ—cm)\vec{F}^{\,\text{ext}} = \dfrac{d}{dt}\left(m_T\vec{V}_{\text{cm}}\right)Translational equationThe center of mass moves like one particle of mass mTm_T carrying every external force; it holds no information about rotation
ฯ„โƒ—Sโ€‰ext=ฯ„โƒ—S,cmโ€‰ext+ฯ„โƒ—cmโ€‰ext\vec{\tau}_S^{\,\text{ext}} = \vec{\tau}_{S,\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} + \vec{\tau}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}}Torque splitOrbital piece ฯ„โƒ—S,cmโ€‰ext=rโƒ—S,cmร—Fโƒ—โ€‰ext\vec{\tau}_{S,\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} = \vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times\vec{F}^{\,\text{ext}} (all external forces placed at the cm); spin piece ฯ„โƒ—cmโ€‰ext=โˆ‘irโƒ—cm,iร—Fโƒ—iโ€‰ext\vec{\tau}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} = \sum_i\vec{r}_{\text{cm},i}\times\vec{F}_i^{\,\text{ext}} (each force where it acts, no reference to SS)
ฯ„โƒ—S,cmโ€‰ext=dLโƒ—Sโ€‰orbitaldt\vec{\tau}_{S,\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} = \dfrac{d\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}}}{dt}Orbital relation (SS fixed)The torque law for a single particle mTm_T at the cm; it follows from the translational equation and adds nothing new
ฯ„โƒ—cmโ€‰ext=dLโƒ—cmโ€‰spindt\vec{\tau}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} = \dfrac{d\vec{L}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{spin}}}{dt}Spin relationHolds even when Aโƒ—cmโ‰ 0โƒ—\vec{A}_{\text{cm}} \neq \vec{0}; about another accelerating point PP an extra term โˆ’Mโ€‰rโƒ—P,cmร—aโƒ—P-M\,\vec{r}_{P,\text{cm}}\times\vec{a}_P appears

Key Insight: In uniform gravity ฯ„โƒ—cmโ€‰ext=(โˆ‘imirโƒ—cm,i)ร—gโƒ—=0โƒ—\vec{\tau}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} = \left(\sum_i m_i\vec{r}_{\text{cm},i}\right)\times\vec{g} = \vec{0}, so a thrown baton keeps Lโƒ—cmโ€‰spin=Icmฯ‰โƒ—cm\vec{L}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{spin}} = I_{\text{cm}}\vec{\omega}_{\text{cm}} constant: translation fixes the parabola, spin fixes the steady turning.

IIOrbital Piece Plus Spin Piece

Moving the point SS changes only the orbital piece rโƒ—S,cmร—Fโƒ—โ€‰ext\vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times\vec{F}^{\,\text{ext}}; the spin piece ฯ„โƒ—cmโ€‰ext\vec{\tau}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} never mentions SS.

IIIWhy the Center of Mass Is Special

A rod dropped level never starts turning, yet gravity has a torque about its falling end.

IVThe Thrown Baton

With no torque about the cm, the baton's spin is constant while its orbital angular momentum about the ground keeps changing.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 ยท Split the Torque

Given: a body's center of mass is at rโƒ—S,cm=(2.0,ย 1.0)ย m\vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}} = (2.0,\ 1.0)\ \text{m} from a fixed point SS at the origin. The only external force, Fโƒ—=(0,ย 5.0)ย N\vec{F} = (0,\ 5.0)\ \text{N}, acts at the point (3.0,ย 1.0)ย m(3.0,\ 1.0)\ \text{m}. Find the spin piece ฯ„โƒ—cmโ€‰ext\vec{\tau}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} (k^\hat{k} out of the page).

โœ… Correct! The force acts 1.0ย m1.0\ \text{m} to the right of the cm, so ฯ„โƒ—cmโ€‰ext=(1.0)(5.0)โ€‰k^=5.0โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m\vec{\tau}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} = (1.0)(5.0)\,\hat{k} = 5.0\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}.
โŒ That is the orbital piece. rโƒ—S,cmร—Fโƒ—=10โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m\vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times\vec{F} = 10\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m} places the force at the cm; the spin piece uses rโƒ—cm,i\vec{r}_{\text{cm},i}, from the cm to where the force acts.
โŒ That is the whole torque about SS. rโƒ—S,iร—Fโƒ—=15โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m\vec{r}_{S,i}\times\vec{F} = 15\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m} is orbital plus spin; subtract the orbital 10โ€‰k^10\,\hat{k}.
โŒ Not quite. The spin piece vanishes only when the force's line of action passes through the cm; this force acts 1.0ย m1.0\ \text{m} to the side of it.
โŒ Not quite. Use rโƒ—cm,i=(3.0โˆ’2.0,ย 1.0โˆ’1.0)=(1.0,ย 0)ย m\vec{r}_{\text{cm},i} = (3.0 - 2.0,\ 1.0 - 1.0) = (1.0,\ 0)\ \text{m}.
Show solution

The vector from the cm to the point of application is

rโƒ—cm,i=(3.0,ย 1.0)โˆ’(2.0,ย 1.0)=(1.0,ย 0)ย m.\vec{r}_{\text{cm},i} = (3.0,\ 1.0) - (2.0,\ 1.0) = (1.0,\ 0)\ \text{m}.

With (rโƒ—ร—Fโƒ—)z=rxFyโˆ’ryFx(\vec{r}\times\vec{F})_z = r_xF_y - r_yF_x:

ฯ„โƒ—cmโ€‰ext=[(1.0)(5.0)โˆ’(0)(0)]โ€‰k^=5.0โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m.\vec{\tau}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} = \big[(1.0)(5.0) - (0)(0)\big]\,\hat{k} = 5.0\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}.

Check with the split: the orbital piece is rโƒ—S,cmร—Fโƒ—=[(2.0)(5.0)โˆ’(1.0)(0)]โ€‰k^=10โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m\vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times\vec{F} = \big[(2.0)(5.0) - (1.0)(0)\big]\,\hat{k} = 10\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}, and the torque about SS computed directly is [(3.0)(5.0)โˆ’(1.0)(0)]โ€‰k^=15โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m=10โ€‰k^+5.0โ€‰k^\big[(3.0)(5.0) - (1.0)(0)\big]\,\hat{k} = 15\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m} = 10\,\hat{k} + 5.0\,\hat{k}.

Problem 2 ยท The Baton in Flight

Given: a baton is thrown end over end and air resistance is negligible. Which statement is correct?

โœ… Correct! Uniform gravity gives zero torque about the cm but a torque rโƒ—S,cmร—mTgโƒ—\vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times m_T\vec{g} about a ground point, which changes only the orbital piece.
โŒ Not quite. โˆ‘irโƒ—cm,iร—migโƒ—=(โˆ‘imirโƒ—cm,i)ร—gโƒ—=0โƒ—\sum_i\vec{r}_{\text{cm},i}\times m_i\vec{g} = \left(\sum_i m_i\vec{r}_{\text{cm},i}\right)\times\vec{g} = \vec{0}: the mass-weighted positions about the cm sum to zero.
โŒ That is the trap. The spin relation holds about the cm even when Aโƒ—cmโ‰ 0โƒ—\vec{A}_{\text{cm}} \neq \vec{0}; the โˆ’miAโƒ—cm-m_i\vec{A}_{\text{cm}} terms add up to โˆ’(โˆ‘imirโƒ—cm,i)ร—Aโƒ—cm=0โƒ—-\left(\sum_i m_i\vec{r}_{\text{cm},i}\right)\times\vec{A}_{\text{cm}} = \vec{0}.
โŒ Not quite. About SS the weight acts at the cm with lever arm rโƒ—S,cm\vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}, so ฯ„โƒ—Sโ€‰ext=rโƒ—S,cmร—mTgโƒ—โ‰ 0โƒ—\vec{\tau}_S^{\,\text{ext}} = \vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times m_T\vec{g} \neq \vec{0} whenever the cm is not directly above SS.
Show solution

Spin: the only external force is migโƒ—m_i\vec{g} on each particle, and gโƒ—\vec{g} is the same for all of them:

ฯ„โƒ—cmโ€‰ext=โˆ‘irโƒ—cm,iร—migโƒ—=(โˆ‘imirโƒ—cm,i)ร—gโƒ—=0โƒ—.\vec{\tau}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} = \sum_i\vec{r}_{\text{cm},i}\times m_i\vec{g} = \left(\sum_i m_i\vec{r}_{\text{cm},i}\right)\times\vec{g} = \vec{0}.

The spin relation holds about the cm even though the cm accelerates at gโƒ—\vec{g}, so Lโƒ—cmโ€‰spin=Icmฯ‰โƒ—cm\vec{L}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{spin}} = I_{\text{cm}}\vec{\omega}_{\text{cm}} is constant and the baton turns at a steady rate.

Orbital: about a fixed ground point SS,

dLโƒ—Sโ€‰orbitaldt=rโƒ—S,cmร—mTgโƒ—,\frac{d\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}}}{dt} = \vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times m_T\vec{g},

which is not zero while the cm is to the side of SS. So Lโƒ—Sโ€‰sys=Lโƒ—Sโ€‰orbital+Lโƒ—cmโ€‰spin\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{sys}} = \vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}} + \vec{L}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{spin}} changes, entirely through its orbital piece.

Problem 3 ยท Orbital Angular Momentum of the Baton

Given: a baton of mass mT=0.40ย kgm_T = 0.40\ \text{kg} is in flight. At one instant its cm is at rโƒ—S,cm=(2.0,ย 1.5)ย m\vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}} = (2.0,\ 1.5)\ \text{m} from a point SS on the ground and moves with Vโƒ—cm=(3.0,ย โˆ’1.0)ย m/s\vec{V}_{\text{cm}} = (3.0,\ -1.0)\ \text{m/s}; gโƒ—=(0,ย โˆ’9.8)ย m/s2\vec{g} = (0,\ -9.8)\ \text{m/s}^2, k^\hat{k} out of the page. Find dLโƒ—Sโ€‰orbital/dtd\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}}/dt and Lโƒ—Sโ€‰orbital\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}} at that instant.

What is dLโƒ—Sโ€‰orbital/dtd\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}}/dt?

What is Lโƒ—Sโ€‰orbital\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}}?

โœ… Correct! Both are clockwise: Lโƒ—Sโ€‰orbital=โˆ’2.6โ€‰k^ย kgโ‹…m2/s\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}} = -2.6\,\hat{k}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^2/\text{s}, growing more negative at 7.84ย Nโ‹…m7.84\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}.
โŒ Check the sign. The weight points down and the cm is to the right of SS, so the torque about SS is clockwise: (2.0)(โˆ’3.92)โˆ’(1.5)(0)=โˆ’7.84(2.0)(-3.92) - (1.5)(0) = -7.84.
โŒ Wrong lever arm. For a vertical force only the horizontal component of rโƒ—S,cm\vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}} contributes: rxFyr_xF_y with rx=2.0ย mr_x = 2.0\ \text{m}, not the height 1.5ย m1.5\ \text{m}.
โŒ That is the spin piece. Gravity has no torque about the cm, but about SS the weight acts at the cm with lever arm 2.0ย m2.0\ \text{m}.
โŒ Check the torque. Use rโƒ—S,cmร—mTgโƒ—\vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times m_T\vec{g} with mTgโƒ—=(0,ย โˆ’3.92)ย Nm_T\vec{g} = (0,\ -3.92)\ \text{N}.
โŒ Check the sign. (rโƒ—ร—pโƒ—)z=xpyโˆ’ypx(\vec{r}\times\vec{p})_z = xp_y - yp_x, not ypxโˆ’xpyyp_x - xp_y.
โŒ Missing the mass. rโƒ—S,cmร—Vโƒ—cm=โˆ’6.5โ€‰k^ย m2/s\vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times\vec{V}_{\text{cm}} = -6.5\,\hat{k}\ \text{m}^2/\text{s}; multiply by mT=0.40ย kgm_T = 0.40\ \text{kg}.
โŒ Check the cross product. It is a difference, xVyโˆ’yVxxV_y - yV_x, not a sum xVy+yVxxV_y + yV_x.
โŒ Check the cross product. Lโƒ—Sโ€‰orbital=rโƒ—S,cmร—mTVโƒ—cm\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}} = \vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times m_T\vec{V}_{\text{cm}}.
Show solution

Rate of change. By the orbital relation the weight mTgโƒ—=(0,ย โˆ’3.92)ย Nm_T\vec{g} = (0,\ -3.92)\ \text{N} acts at the cm:

dLโƒ—Sโ€‰orbitaldt=rโƒ—S,cmร—mTgโƒ—=[(2.0)(โˆ’3.92)โˆ’(1.5)(0)]โ€‰k^=โˆ’7.84โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m.\frac{d\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}}}{dt} = \vec{r}_{S,\text{cm}}\times m_T\vec{g} = \big[(2.0)(-3.92) - (1.5)(0)\big]\,\hat{k} = -7.84\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}.

Orbital angular momentum. mTVโƒ—cm=(1.2,ย โˆ’0.40)ย kgโ‹…m/sm_T\vec{V}_{\text{cm}} = (1.2,\ -0.40)\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m/s}, so

Lโƒ—Sโ€‰orbital=[(2.0)(โˆ’0.40)โˆ’(1.5)(1.2)]โ€‰k^=(โˆ’0.80โˆ’1.8)โ€‰k^=โˆ’2.6โ€‰k^ย kgโ‹…m2/s.\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{orbital}} = \big[(2.0)(-0.40) - (1.5)(1.2)\big]\,\hat{k} = (-0.80 - 1.8)\,\hat{k} = -2.6\,\hat{k}\ \text{kg}\cdot\text{m}^2/\text{s}.

Both are clockwise. The spin of the baton plays no part: it adds a constant Lโƒ—cmโ€‰spin\vec{L}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{spin}} to Lโƒ—Sโ€‰sys\vec{L}_S^{\,\text{sys}}.

Problem 4 ยท Torque About an Accelerating Point

Given: a uniform rod, M=2.0ย kgM = 2.0\ \text{kg} and 1.2ย m1.2\ \text{m} long, is released from rest while horizontal and falls without turning (g=9.8ย m/s2g = 9.8\ \text{m/s}^2). Take PP at the rod's left end, falling with it, and measure Lโƒ—P\vec{L}_P with velocities relative to PP. Find dLโƒ—P/dtd\vec{L}_P/dt (k^\hat{k} out of the page).

โœ… Correct! The extra term โˆ’Mโ€‰rโƒ—P,cmร—aโƒ—P=+11.76โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m-M\,\vec{r}_{P,\text{cm}}\times\vec{a}_P = +11.76\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m} cancels the torque of the weight, consistent with a rod that never starts turning.
โŒ That is the trap. โˆ’11.76โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m-11.76\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m} is ฯ„โƒ—Pโ€‰ext\vec{\tau}_P^{\,\text{ext}} alone. PP accelerates, so the extra term โˆ’Mโ€‰rโƒ—P,cmร—aโƒ—P-M\,\vec{r}_{P,\text{cm}}\times\vec{a}_P must be added; only about the cm is it absent.
โŒ Check the sign of the extra term. With aโƒ—P=gโƒ—\vec{a}_P = \vec{g} it is โˆ’Mโ€‰rโƒ—P,cmร—gโƒ—-M\,\vec{r}_{P,\text{cm}}\times\vec{g}, the opposite of the weight's torque, not a copy of it.
โŒ Not quite. +11.76โ€‰k^+11.76\,\hat{k} is the extra term by itself; it still has to be added to ฯ„โƒ—Pโ€‰ext=โˆ’11.76โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m\vec{\tau}_P^{\,\text{ext}} = -11.76\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}.
Show solution

About an accelerating point PP the same derivation as for the spin relation leaves an extra term:

dLโƒ—Pdt=ฯ„โƒ—Pโ€‰extโˆ’Mโ€‰rโƒ—P,cmร—aโƒ—P.\frac{d\vec{L}_P}{dt} = \vec{\tau}_P^{\,\text{ext}} - M\,\vec{r}_{P,\text{cm}}\times\vec{a}_P.

The cm is 0.60ย m0.60\ \text{m} to the right of PP: rโƒ—P,cm=(0.60,ย 0)ย m\vec{r}_{P,\text{cm}} = (0.60,\ 0)\ \text{m}, and Mgโƒ—=(0,ย โˆ’19.6)ย NM\vec{g} = (0,\ -19.6)\ \text{N}.

ฯ„โƒ—Pโ€‰ext=rโƒ—P,cmร—Mgโƒ—=(0.60)(โˆ’19.6)โ€‰k^=โˆ’11.76โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m\vec{\tau}_P^{\,\text{ext}} = \vec{r}_{P,\text{cm}}\times M\vec{g} = (0.60)(-19.6)\,\hat{k} = -11.76\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}

PP falls with the rod, so aโƒ—P=gโƒ—\vec{a}_P = \vec{g} and

โˆ’Mโ€‰rโƒ—P,cmร—aโƒ—P=โˆ’(0.60)(โˆ’19.6)โ€‰k^=+11.76โ€‰k^ย Nโ‹…m.-M\,\vec{r}_{P,\text{cm}}\times\vec{a}_P = -(0.60)(-19.6)\,\hat{k} = +11.76\,\hat{k}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}. dLโƒ—Pdt=โˆ’11.76โ€‰k^+11.76โ€‰k^=0โƒ—.\frac{d\vec{L}_P}{dt} = -11.76\,\hat{k} + 11.76\,\hat{k} = \vec{0}.

Applying ฯ„โƒ—Pโ€‰ext=dLโƒ—P/dt\vec{\tau}_P^{\,\text{ext}} = d\vec{L}_P/dt about the falling end would predict a rod that starts turning; about the cm, ฯ„โƒ—cmโ€‰ext=0โƒ—\vec{\tau}_{\text{cm}}^{\,\text{ext}} = \vec{0} gives the right answer with no correction.

Solved: 0 / 4