Differential-Equations Β· Unit 2 Β· Video 3 Β· Interactive Practice
| Formula | Name | What it gives |
|---|---|---|
| The initial value problem | No elementary solution | |
| Differentiate the equation | from , , alone | |
| Evaluate at the start | A positive number, so convex | |
| The corner-cutting rule | reverses both arrows |
Key Insight: The solution is never found β only the sign of at the starting point, which the differential equation hands over for free. That sign decides which side of the true curve the broken line falls on.
Euler's broken line always cuts the corner; the sign of decides which corner.
The field here depends on alone, so each strut is exactly parallel to the curve's tangent at that ; for a general that parallelism is only approximate, and the corner-cutting is the same.
For , the starting point alone fixes and the verdict.
Crossing the dashed curve flips the verdict β which is why a sign computed at one point is trustworthy only near that point.
The equation grades its own approximation: , so is too small.
Problem 1 Β· Differentiate the Equation
Given: , where is a solution β find by differentiating both sides with respect to .
Differentiate both sides of with respect to :
The second term needs the chain rule because : .
Nothing here mentions a formula for the solution. Given a point , the original equation supplies , and this identity then supplies .
Problem 2 Β· Same Equation, New Starting Point
Given: with . Two Euler steps with give . Which statement about the true value is justified?
Step 1 β the slope at the start:
Step 2 β the second derivative at the start:
Step 3 β apply the rule. A negative second derivative means the solution is concave there: it bends down and away from every tangent, so each strut lands above the curve and the misses accumulate upward.
The same equation, a different starting point, and the verdict reverses β the sign of is what does the deciding, not the equation alone. (A numerical solution gives , indeed below .)
Problem 3 Β· A Different Equation
Given: with β find the second derivative at the start, then say which side an Euler estimate of falls on.
What is the second derivative at the start?
Which side does the Euler estimate fall on?
Step 1 β the slope at the start:
Step 2 β differentiate the equation:
Step 3 β evaluate at :
Step 4 β read off the verdict. Positive second derivative means convex, and a convex solution bends up away from each line element, so the struts stay underneath:
Two traps live in this problem: dropping the chain rule gives and flips the verdict, and forgetting that differentiates to gives instead of .
Problem 4 Β· How Far Does the Verdict Reach?
Given: for , we found and concluded . A numerical solution shows stays positive until and is negative after that. What is the honest scope of the argument?
The computation produced one number: . Because is continuous along the solution, a positive value at stays positive on an interval around β so the solution is convex there and the broken line runs below it. That interval is exactly what the argument certifies.
Why the caveat matters. If the solution changes from convex to concave, the tangents past the inflection run above the curve, the broken line begins closing the gap, and it can cross to the other side. Nothing in the starting-point calculation announces where that happens; here a numerical solution locates the inflection near β ten times beyond the interval that was computed.
The recipe, stated generally. For any , differentiating the equation along the solution gives in terms of , and ; its sign at the starting point tells you which side Euler lands on nearby β without ever calculating the solution.
Solved: 0 / 4