The one-period formula applied at every node; the 2 counts the two paths, up-down and down-up, that meet at udS0โ; the true probability p never appears
(knโ) paths with k up moves, each with risk-neutral probability pโk(1โpโ)nโk, all paying Max[0,ukdnโkS0โโK]; the sum is discounted over n periods, with pโ=uโdrโdโ and r the gross riskless return per period
Boundary conditions C(S,T)=Max[SโK,0] and C(0,t)=0; here r is the continuously compounded rate and ฯ, the volatility, is what remains of u and d
Key Insight: Nothing in the binomial formula fixes the length of a period, so the time to expiry can be cut as finely as needed; in the limit the replication condition C0โ=V0โ becomes the Black-Scholes PDE, and neither p nor the stock's expected return ever enters. All of it rests on independent, identically distributed coin tosses.
IIRolling Back a Two-Period Tree
The one-period formula applied node by node, backward from expiry, gives the same C0โ as the weights pโ2, 2pโ(1โpโ), (1โpโ)2.
IIICounting Paths: the n-Period Formula
2n paths finish at only n+1 prices; each price contributes paths ร one path's risk-neutral probability ร payoff.
IVThe Continuous-Time Limit
Holding the horizon fixed while cutting it into ever more periods, the binomial price converges to the Black-Scholes price.
๐ก The dashed line, โ10.45, is the value the Black-Scholes-Merton PDE gives for these inputs (illustrative: volatility ฯ of 20% a year, a riskless rate of 5% a year continuously compounded). At every n the tree's per-period u, d and gross r are chosen to match that ฯ and that rate over each, ever shorter, period, which keeps the spread of final prices from blowing up or collapsing. How u and d are chosen from data is the subject of the next video.
VQuiz Questions
Problem 1 ยท A Two-Period Call
Given: A stock trades at $50. Each period it moves up by u=1.2 or down by d=0.9, and the gross riskless return per period is r=1.02 (discount by dividing by r). Investors believe an up move has probability p=0.65. Find the value today of a European call with strike $50 expiring in two periods.
โ Correct! With pโ=0.4 the weights are 0.16, 0.48, 0.36; the belief p=0.65 plays no part in the price.
โ Missing the coefficient 2. Two paths, up-down and down-up, reach udS0โ, so the middle payoff carries weight 2pโ(1โpโ)=0.48, not 0.24.
โ That uses the true probability. Replication prices the call with pโ=uโdrโdโ; investors can disagree about p and still agree on the price.
โ Discounted only once. The payoff arrives two periods from now, so the expected payoff is divided by r2=1.0404, not by r.
โ Not quite. Find pโ, the three end prices and their payoffs, then weight them pโ2, 2pโ(1โpโ), (1โpโ)2 and divide by r2.
The call is worth about $5.23. The probability p=0.65 was never used: it does not appear in the two-period formula.
Problem 2 ยท Paths, Periods and End Prices
Given: Traders agree that over the next 5 hours (300 minutes) a stock has 1,024 possible price paths in a recombining binomial tree with equal periods. Find the number and length of the periods, the number of distinct prices at expiry, and the number of paths that end at the price reached with exactly 3 up moves.
Periods
Distinct prices at expiry
Paths ending at the price with exactly 3 up moves
โ Correct!210=1,024 gives 10 periods of 30 minutes; the tree recombines onto n+1=11 end prices, and (310โ)=120 of the paths end at u3d7S0โ.
โ Each step doubles the number of paths. It does not add two: n steps give 2n paths, so solve 2n=1,024.
โ Not a square root.322=1,024, but the path count is 2n, not n2.
โ One period per path overcounts. Every period doubles the number of paths, so n periods already give 2n.
โ That counts paths, not prices. An up move then a down move lands where a down then an up lands, so paths with the same number of ups share an end price.
โ Off by one. The number of up moves k runs from 0 to n, which is n+1 values.
โ Many orders reach the same node. Any arrangement of 3 ups among the 10 moves ends at u3d7S0โ.
โ Not a product. Choosing which 3 of the 10 moves are ups is (310โ)=3โ 2โ 110โ 9โ 8โ.
โ Paths are not spread evenly. The middle end prices collect far more paths than the extremes; each end price gets (k10โ) of them.
โ Check the periods. Solve 2n=1,024, then divide 300 minutes by n.
โ Check the end prices. In a recombining tree the end price depends only on the number of up moves k.
โ Check the path count. Count the ways to place 3 up moves among 10 periods.
Show solution
Periods. Each period doubles the number of paths, so n periods give 2n paths and 2n=1,024=210 means n=10. Each period lasts 300/10=30 minutes.
End prices. A path with k up moves ends at ukd10โkS0โ whatever the order of the moves, so the end prices are indexed by k=0,1,โฆ,10: that is n+1=11 distinct prices.
Paths to the 3-up price. The number of ways to choose which 3 of the 10 moves are up moves is
(310โ)=3โ 2โ 110โ 9โ 8โ=120
Check: summing (k10โ) over all k gives 210=1,024 paths.
Problem 3 ยท Three Periods, Two Routes
Given: A stock trades at $100; each period it moves up by u=1.2 or down by d=0.9, and the gross riskless return per period is r=1.05 (discount by dividing by r). A European call has strike $100 and expires in three periods. Find the call's value Cuโ at the up node after one period, and its value C0โ today.
Value at the up node after one period, Cuโ
Value today, C0โ
โ Correct! Backward induction through Cuโโ29.93 and Cdโโ6.71 and the three-period formula with weights 1,3,3,1 both give C0โโ17.45.
โ Discounted only once. From the up node the call still has two periods to run, so its expected payoff is divided by r2.
โ Missing the coefficient 2. From uS0โ, two paths reach u2dS0โ, so that payoff is weighted 2pโ(1โpโ)=0.5.
โ That is the payoff from exercising now. A European call cannot be exercised at the up node; its value there is the discounted risk-neutral expectation of the payoffs two periods later.
โ The binomial coefficients are missing. Three paths end at u2dS0โ, so its payoff carries (23โ)pโ2(1โpโ), not pโ2(1โpโ).
โ Discounted only once. The payoff arrives three periods from now; divide by r3=1.157625.
โ One in-the-money price is missing. Besides u3S0โ, the price u2dS0โ is above the strike too and adds its term.
โ Check Cuโ. From uS0โ the call faces a two-period tree: weight its three end payoffs and divide by r2.
โ Check C0โ. Use the n=3 formula, or apply the one-period formula to Cuโ and Cdโ.
Show solution
First pโ=1.2โ0.91.05โ0.9โ=0.30.15โ=0.5. The end prices (in dollars) are u3S0โ=172.8, u2dS0โ=129.6, ud2S0โ=97.2 and d3S0โ=72.9, so the payoffs are 72.8, 29.6, 0 and 0.
Cuโ. From uS0โ=120 two periods remain, with end payoffs 72.8, 29.6, 0:
Check by rolling back. From dS0โ=90: Cdโ=1.10251โ[(0.5)2(29.6)]=1.10257.4โโ6.71, and then C0โ=1.051โ[0.5(29.93)+0.5(6.71)]โ17.45. The call is worth about $17.45 today.
Problem 4 ยท What the Limit Means
Given: An option's time to expiry is held fixed while the number of binomial periods nโโ, with u and d both closing in on 1, and the binomial price converges to the Black-Scholes price. Which statement about this limit is correct?
โ Correct! The equation is the arbitrage condition written in continuous time: just as p never entered the tree's price, the expected return never enters the PDE.
โ That r is the riskless rate. The stock's expected return appears nowhere in the equation, just as the true probability p never entered the tree's price.
โ The two r's differ. In the tree r is a gross return per period (one plus the one-period interest rate); in the PDE r is the continuously compounded rate.
โ The other way round. With u and d fixed, more and more periods would make the spread of final prices blow up; they must shrink toward 1 at the rate that keeps the spread realistic.
Show solution
In one period the price is pinned by replication: ฮโ shares and Bโ dollars of bonds match the call in both states, and the call must cost what that portfolio costs, C0โ=V0โ=S0โฮโ+Bโ. Repeating that condition over infinitely many, infinitely short periods turns it into the PDE
Its coefficients are the volatility ฯ (what remains of u and d) and the continuously compounded riskless rate r; no expected return appears, just as p is absent from the binomial formula. Option (c) confuses the tree's gross per-period r with this continuously compounded rate, and (d) has the limit backward: the moves must shrink toward 1, or the spread of final prices blows up as n grows.