Finance-Theory ยท Unit 6 ยท Video 4 ยท Interactive Practice

Forward Rates: Locking In Next Year's Interest Rate From Today's Spot Rates

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameWhat you need
1+ft=P0,tโˆ’1P0,t=(1+r0,t)t(1+r0,tโˆ’1)tโˆ’11 + f_t = \dfrac{P_{0,t-1}}{P_{0,t}} = \dfrac{(1+r_{0,t})^t}{(1+r_{0,t-1})^{t-1}}One-year forward rate, dates tโˆ’1t-1 to ttTwo discount bond prices, or the two spot rates for maturities tโˆ’1t-1 and tt
(1+r0,2)2=(1+r0,1)(1+f2)(1+r_{0,2})^2 = (1+r_{0,1})(1+f_2)Two routes to year 2The case t=2t = 2: two years at the two-year spot rate, or one year at the spot rate then one at the forward rate
f1=r0,1f_1 = r_{0,1}The first forward rateNothing more: its period starts today
(1+f3โ†’5)2=(1+r0,5)5(1+r0,3)3(1+f_{3\to5})^2 = \dfrac{(1+r_{0,5})^5}{(1+r_{0,3})^3}Two-year forward rate f3โ†’5f_{3\to5}, years 3 to 5, quoted per yearThe five-year and three-year spot rates; (1+f3โ†’5)2=(1+f4)(1+f5)(1+f_{3\to5})^2 = (1+f_4)(1+f_5)

Key Insight: Keep three rates apart. A spot rate r0,tr_{0,t} starts today and is known today; a future spot rate RtR_t starts later and is unknown today; a forward rate ftf_t is set today for a period that starts later. When year 1 arrives, R2R_2 need not equal the f2f_2 quoted today.

IIReading Forwards off the Spot Curve

Each one-year forward rate ftf_t comes from comparing two spot rates, r0,tr_{0,t} and r0,tโˆ’1r_{0,t-1}.

IIIThe CFO Locks In Year 2

Borrowing for one year and lending for two, both today, turns the unknown R2R_2 into a rate fixed now.

Position ($M)Year 0Year 1Year 2
1-Yr Borrowing
2-Yr Lending
Repatriation
Net

IVCompounding, Not Averaging

If two years together earn r0,2r_{0,2} and year one earns r0,1r_{0,1}, what must year two earn?

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 ยท Forward Rate from Two Spot Rates

Given: r0,1=4%r_{0,1} = 4\% and r0,2=6%r_{0,2} = 6\% โ€” find the one-year forward rate f2f_2 for year 1 to year 2.

โœ… Correct! 1+f2=(1.06)2/1.04=1.1236/1.04โ‰ˆ1.08041 + f_2 = (1.06)^2 / 1.04 = 1.1236 / 1.04 \approx 1.0804: year 2 has to earn more than 6% because year 1 earns only 4%.
โŒ Not quite. 5%5\% averages the two spot rates. But r0,2=6%r_{0,2} = 6\% already covers both years; f2f_2 is the rate for the second year alone, which must make up for year 1 earning only 4%.
โŒ Close, but that is averaging, not compounding. 2ร—6โˆ’4=82 \times 6 - 4 = 8 treats 6%6\% as the simple average of 4%4\% and f2f_2. Compounding decides it: 1.04ร—1.08=1.12321.04 \times 1.08 = 1.1232 falls just short of (1.06)2=1.1236(1.06)^2 = 1.1236, so f2f_2 is slightly above 8%8\%.
โŒ Not quite. 6%โˆ’4%=2%6\% - 4\% = 2\% is the gap between the two spot rates, not a rate for any period. Compare the growth factors: (1.06)2(1.06)^2 over 1.041.04.
Show solution

Two years at the two-year spot rate must grow a dollar as much as one year at the one-year spot rate followed by one year at the forward rate:

(1+r0,2)2=(1+r0,1)(1+f2)(1+r_{0,2})^2 = (1+r_{0,1})(1+f_2) 1+f2=(1.06)21.04=1.12361.04โ‰ˆ1.08041 + f_2 = \frac{(1.06)^2}{1.04} = \frac{1.1236}{1.04} \approx 1.0804

So f2โ‰ˆ8.04%f_2 \approx 8.04\%. Check: 1.04ร—1.0804=1.123616โ‰ˆ1.1236=(1.06)21.04 \times 1.0804 = 1.123616 \approx 1.1236 = (1.06)^2.

Problem 2 ยท Forward Rate vs Future Spot Rate

Given: Today r0,1=5%r_{0,1} = 5\% and r0,2=7%r_{0,2} = 7\%, so f2โ‰ˆ9.04%f_2 \approx 9.04\%, and the CFO borrows $9.524 million for one year at 5% and lends it for two years at 7%. When year 1 arrives, the one-year rate on offer is R2=7.5%R_2 = 7.5\%. Which statement is correct?

โœ… Correct! Both trades were agreed today, so the year-2 payout of $10.904 million was fixed today; the $10 million repatriated in year 1 still earns 10.904/10โˆ’1=9.04%10.904 / 10 - 1 = 9.04\%, whatever R2R_2 turns out to be.
โŒ Not quite. Nothing resets. The two-year loan at 7% pays 9.524ร—(1.07)2โ‰ˆ10.9049.524 \times (1.07)^2 \approx 10.904 million in year 2 no matter what rate is quoted in year 1; that is the whole point of locking in.
โŒ Not quite. f2f_2 is set by today's bond prices; R2R_2 is set only when year 1 arrives and cannot be observed today. The two usually differ, and a gap between them is no evidence that today's prices were wrong.
โŒ Not quite. 7%7\% is the rate for the two years together. The first year earns 5%5\%, so the second-year piece is f2โ‰ˆ9.04%f_2 \approx 9.04\%: 1.05ร—1.0904=1.14492โ‰ˆ(1.07)21.05 \times 1.0904 = 1.14492 \approx (1.07)^2.
Show solution

Follow the CFO's cash in $ millions. Year 0: borrow 10/1.05โ‰ˆ9.52410/1.05 \approx 9.524, lend the same 9.5249.524, net 00. Year 1: the loan's repayment 101.05ร—1.05=10\tfrac{10}{1.05} \times 1.05 = 10 is covered by the 1010 repatriated, net 00. Year 2: the two-year loan pays 101.05ร—(1.07)2โ‰ˆ10.904\tfrac{10}{1.05} \times (1.07)^2 \approx 10.904.

Every one of these amounts was fixed by the two trades made today, so the year-2 rate is 10.904/10โˆ’1=9.04%10.904 / 10 - 1 = 9.04\% whatever R2R_2 turns out to be. A forward rate is observed today for a future period; the future spot rate R2R_2 is unknown today and will rarely equal f2f_2.

Problem 3 ยท Forward Rates from STRIPS Prices

Given: STRIPS prices per $1 of face value: P0,1=0.95P_{0,1} = 0.95, P0,2=0.88P_{0,2} = 0.88, P0,3=0.80P_{0,3} = 0.80 โ€” find the one-year forward rates f2f_2 and f3f_3 (to two decimal places).

What is fโ‚‚ (year 1 to year 2)?

What is fโ‚ƒ (year 2 to year 3)?

โœ… Correct! Each forward rate is the ratio of two adjacent prices: 0.95/0.88โ‰ˆ1.07950.95/0.88 \approx 1.0795 and 0.88/0.80=1.100.88/0.80 = 1.10.
โŒ Not quite. 1/0.95โˆ’1โ‰ˆ5.26%1/0.95 - 1 \approx 5.26\% is the one-year spot rate r0,1r_{0,1}, which is f1f_1. For f2f_2 compare the bonds maturing at 1 and 2: P0,1/P0,2P_{0,1}/P_{0,2}.
โŒ Not quite. (1/0.88)1/2โˆ’1โ‰ˆ6.60%(1/0.88)^{1/2} - 1 \approx 6.60\% is the two-year spot rate r0,2r_{0,2}, spread over both years. f2f_2 covers year 1 to year 2 only: P0,1/P0,2P_{0,1}/P_{0,2}.
โŒ Check the ratio's direction. 0.88/0.95โˆ’1โ‰ˆโˆ’7.37%0.88/0.95 - 1 \approx -7.37\% puts the later price on top. The earlier bond is worth more, so 1+f2=P0,1/P0,21 + f_2 = P_{0,1}/P_{0,2}.
โŒ Not quite. 0.95/0.80โˆ’1=18.75%0.95/0.80 - 1 = 18.75\% compares maturities 1 and 3, so it spans two years. f3f_3 uses the adjacent pair: P0,2/P0,3P_{0,2}/P_{0,3}.
โŒ Check the ratio's direction. 0.80/0.88โˆ’1โ‰ˆโˆ’9.09%0.80/0.88 - 1 \approx -9.09\% puts the later price on top; 1+f3=P0,2/P0,31 + f_3 = P_{0,2}/P_{0,3}.
โŒ Not quite. (1/0.80)1/3โˆ’1โ‰ˆ7.72%(1/0.80)^{1/3} - 1 \approx 7.72\% is the three-year spot rate r0,3r_{0,3}, spread over all three years. f3f_3 is the year-3 piece alone: P0,2/P0,3P_{0,2}/P_{0,3}.
โŒ Check fโ‚‚. Use 1+f2=P0,1/P0,21 + f_2 = P_{0,1}/P_{0,2}.
โŒ Check fโ‚ƒ. Use 1+f3=P0,2/P0,31 + f_3 = P_{0,2}/P_{0,3}.
Show solution

The one-year forward rate between tโˆ’1t-1 and tt is the ratio of the two discount bond prices; the face values cancel:

1+ft=P0,tโˆ’1P0,t1 + f_t = \frac{P_{0,t-1}}{P_{0,t}} 1+f2=0.950.88โ‰ˆ1.0795โ‡’f2โ‰ˆ7.95%1 + f_2 = \frac{0.95}{0.88} \approx 1.0795 \quad\Rightarrow\quad f_2 \approx 7.95\% 1+f3=0.880.80=1.10โ‡’f3=10.00%1 + f_3 = \frac{0.88}{0.80} = 1.10 \quad\Rightarrow\quad f_3 = 10.00\%

The spot rates are different numbers: r0,1โ‰ˆ5.26%r_{0,1} \approx 5.26\%, r0,2โ‰ˆ6.60%r_{0,2} \approx 6.60\%, r0,3โ‰ˆ7.72%r_{0,3} \approx 7.72\%. Each covers a period that starts today; each forward covers one year that starts later.

Problem 4 ยท A Two-Year Forward Rate

Given: A CFO will receive $5 million at year 3 and pay it out at year 5, and wants to lock in today the rate it earns in between. Today r0,3=5%r_{0,3} = 5\% and r0,5=6%r_{0,5} = 6\%. Find the annual two-year forward rate f3โ†’5f_{3\to5} for years 3 to 5.

โœ… Correct! The ratio of growth factors is the two-year growth, โ‰ˆ1.156010\approx 1.156010; its square root, โ‰ˆ1.0752\approx 1.0752, is the annual rate.
โŒ Not quite. 15.60%15.60\% is the total growth over the two years, (1+f3โ†’5)2โˆ’1(1 + f_{3\to5})^2 - 1. The annual rate needs a square root.
โŒ Close, but that is averaging, not compounding. (5ร—6โˆ’3ร—5)/2=7.5(5 \times 6 - 3 \times 5)/2 = 7.5 treats spot rates as simple averages. Compounding: (1.06)5/(1.05)3โ‰ˆ1.156010(1.06)^5 / (1.05)^3 \approx 1.156010, and 1.156010โ‰ˆ1.0752\sqrt{1.156010} \approx 1.0752.
โŒ Not quite. Halving the two-year growth, 15.60%/215.60\% / 2, ignores compounding within the two years. Take the square root of 1.1560101.156010 instead.
Show solution

Draw the timeline: the loan is agreed today, the money is received at year 3 and repaid at year 5. Compare the five-year bond with the three-year bond:

(1+f3โ†’5)2=(1+r0,5)5(1+r0,3)3=(1.06)5(1.05)3=1.33822557761.157625โ‰ˆ1.156010(1+f_{3\to5})^2 = \frac{(1+r_{0,5})^5}{(1+r_{0,3})^3} = \frac{(1.06)^5}{(1.05)^3} = \frac{1.3382255776}{1.157625} \approx 1.156010 1+f3โ†’5=1.156010โ‰ˆ1.0752โ‡’f3โ†’5โ‰ˆ7.52%1 + f_{3\to5} = \sqrt{1.156010} \approx 1.0752 \quad\Rightarrow\quad f_{3\to5} \approx 7.52\%

The $5 million received at year 3 grows to about $5.780 million by year 5 (5ร—1.156010=5.780055 \times 1.156010 = 5.78005).

Solved: 0 / 4