Finance-Theory Β· Unit 9 Β· Video 7 Β· Interactive Practice

The Dividend Yield Is Half the Answer: Cost of Capital as r = D/P + g

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameWhat it needs
Pt=Drβˆ’g,r>gP_t = \dfrac{D}{r - g}, \quad r > gGordon growth model (the starting point)A dividend DD growing at rate gg forever, discounted at rr; PtP_t is the ex-dividend price, so DD is next period's dividend
r=DPt+gr = \dfrac{D}{P_t} + gCost of capital: dividend yield plus growthMultiply the Gordon model by rβˆ’gr - g, divide by PtP_t, add gg. D/PtD/P_t is the dividend-price ratio, the stock version of coupon over price
r=D0(1+g)Pt+gr = \dfrac{D_0(1+g)}{P_t} + gThe same formula in observable inputsThe dividend just paid D0D_0 and today's price (observed) plus gg (a judgment), with gg measured on the dividend cycle: quarterly dividends, quarterly gg
r=(0.052)(1.049)+0.049β‰ˆ10.35%r = (0.052)(1.049) + 0.049 \approx 10.35\%Duke Power, September 1992Yield D0/P0=5.2%D_0/P_0 = 5.2\% with Value Line's g=4.9%g = 4.9\%; I/B/E/S's g=4.1%g = 4.1\% gives (0.052)(1.041)+0.041β‰ˆ9.51%(0.052)(1.041) + 0.041 \approx 9.51\%

Key Insight: The dividend yield measures what current operations pay out; gg is the one place a company's future growth opportunities enter its cost of capital. The formula ties rr and gg together: assume one and it lets you infer the other, but it hands you neither on its own.

IITwo Pieces of the Required Return

Duke Power's 5.2% dividend yield was only about half of its cost of capital; growth supplied the rest.

IIIThe Price the Yield Alone Cannot Explain

Priced as a flat perpetuity, Duke Power was worth about half its market price; each assumed rr implies a gg.

IVNon-Payers and Negative Cash Flows

Inside its range a negative DD gives a negative price; outside it, deeper losses mean a higher β€œvalue”.

πŸ’‘ These are steady-state expressions: years in which a firm pays nothing or loses money while investing to grow are valued one at a time, and a steady-state formula applies only after them.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 Β· Cost of Capital from the Dividend Just Paid

Given: A stock trades ex-dividend at $40. It has just paid a dividend of $2.00 per share, and dividends are expected to grow at g=5%g = 5\% a year forever. Find the cost of capital rr.

βœ… Correct! Next period's dividend is 2.00Γ—1.05=2.102.00 \times 1.05 = 2.10, so the yield term is 2.10/40=5.25%2.10/40 = 5.25\% and r=5.25%+5%=10.25%r = 5.25\% + 5\% = 10.25\%.
❌ Close, but which dividend? The price is ex-dividend, so the DD in D/PtD/P_t is next period's dividend, D0(1+g)D_0(1+g), not the one just paid.
❌ That is only half the answer. 5.25%5.25\% is the dividend yield on next period's dividend; the cost of capital adds the growth rate gg.
❌ Not quite. Only the dividend grows by (1+g)(1+g); the gg term is added once, unscaled: r=D0(1+g)/Pt+gr = D_0(1+g)/P_t + g.
❌ Not quite. Use r=D0(1+g)/Pt+gr = D_0(1+g)/P_t + g.
Show solution

The price is ex-dividend, so the dividend in the formula is next period's: D=D0(1+g)=2.00Γ—1.05=2.10D = D_0(1+g) = 2.00 \times 1.05 = 2.10 dollars.

r=D0(1+g)Pt+g=2.1040+0.05=0.0525+0.05=0.1025=10.25%r = \frac{D_0(1+g)}{P_t} + g = \frac{2.10}{40} + 0.05 = 0.0525 + 0.05 = 0.1025 = 10.25\%

Using the dividend just paid instead gives 2.00/40+0.05=10.00%2.00/40 + 0.05 = 10.00\%, a quarter of a percentage point too low: the missing piece is D0g/Pt=0.05Γ—0.05=0.25%D_0 g/P_t = 0.05 \times 0.05 = 0.25\%.

Problem 2 Β· Match the Dividend Cycle

Given: A company pays dividends quarterly. It has just paid $0.50 per share, its ex-dividend price is $50, and its dividends are expected to grow 1%1\% per quarter forever. Find its cost of capital per quarter.

βœ… Correct! Quarterly dividend, quarterly growth, quarterly cost of capital: 0.505/50+0.01=2.01%0.505/50 + 0.01 = 2.01\% per quarter.
❌ The cycles are mixed. Multiplying the dividend by 4 puts an annual yield next to a quarterly gg. The formula has no unit of time built in, so every input must be on the same cycle.
❌ Close, but which dividend? At the ex-dividend price the next dividend is 0.50Γ—1.01=0.5050.50 \times 1.01 = 0.505, not the $0.50 just paid.
❌ That is only the dividend yield. Add the quarterly growth rate g=1%g = 1\%.
❌ Not quite. Keep the dividend, the growth rate and the answer all per quarter.
Show solution

Dividends are paid quarterly, so gg and rr are both per quarter. Next quarter's dividend is D0(1+g)=0.50Γ—1.01=0.505D_0(1+g) = 0.50 \times 1.01 = 0.505 dollars.

r=0.50550+0.01=0.0101+0.01=0.0201=2.01%Β perΒ quarterr = \frac{0.505}{50} + 0.01 = 0.0101 + 0.01 = 0.0201 = 2.01\% \text{ per quarter}

The mixed-cycle error annualizes the dividend but keeps the quarterly gg: 4Γ—0.505/50+0.01=0.0404+0.01=5.04%4 \times 0.505/50 + 0.01 = 0.0404 + 0.01 = 5.04\%, which is neither a quarterly nor an annual cost of capital.

Problem 3 Β· What the No-Growth Formula Misses

Given: A stock's dividend yield D0/P0D_0/P_0 is 4%4\%, and its dividends are expected to grow at 6%6\% a year forever. Find its cost of capital rr, and then the value of the share as a no-growth perpetuity D0/rD_0/r at that rr.

What is the cost of capital?

What is the no-growth value D0/rD_0/r?

βœ… Correct! The market price is D0/0.04=25 D0D_0/0.04 = 25\,D_0, which is 25Γ—0.1024=2.5625 \times 0.1024 = 2.56 times the no-growth value. The gap is what gg pays for.
❌ Close, but which dividend? 4%+6%4\% + 6\% uses the dividend just paid. Next period's dividend is D0(1.06)D_0(1.06), so the yield term is 0.04Γ—1.06=4.24%0.04 \times 1.06 = 4.24\%.
❌ That is only the dividend yield. Add the growth rate: r=4.24%+6%r = 4.24\% + 6\%.
❌ Check your cost of capital. Only the dividend grows by (1+g)(1+g): r=(0.04)(1.06)+0.06r = (0.04)(1.06) + 0.06.
❌ That is the market price. D0/0.04=25 D0D_0/0.04 = 25\,D_0 is what the market pays. The no-growth value divides D0D_0 by the cost of capital rr, not by the yield.
❌ Not quite. 1/0.061/0.06 discounts at the growth rate. A perpetuity is discounted at the cost of capital, r=10.24%r = 10.24\%.
❌ Close, but which cost of capital? D0/0.10=10 D0D_0/0.10 = 10\,D_0 uses the 10%10\% that comes from adding gg to the yield on the dividend just paid. The cost of capital here is r=10.24%r = 10.24\%.
❌ Check the no-growth value. Divide D0D_0 by the cost of capital you found, r=0.1024r = 0.1024.
Show solution

Step 1: cost of capital.

r=D0P0(1+g)+g=(0.04)(1.06)+0.06=0.0424+0.06=0.1024=10.24%r = \frac{D_0}{P_0}(1+g) + g = (0.04)(1.06) + 0.06 = 0.0424 + 0.06 = 0.1024 = 10.24\%

Step 2: no-growth value. A flat perpetuity of D0D_0 at rr:

D0r=D00.1024=9.765625 D0β‰ˆ9.77 D0\frac{D_0}{r} = \frac{D_0}{0.1024} = 9.765625\,D_0 \approx 9.77\,D_0

Compare: the market price is P0=D0/0.04=25 D0P_0 = D_0/0.04 = 25\,D_0, and 25/9.765625=2.5625/9.765625 = 2.56. Leave out gg and the stock looks overvalued by a factor of more than two. Duke Power showed the same pattern: 19.23 D019.23\,D_0 against 9.66 D09.66\,D_0.

Problem 4 Β· A Loss-Making Firm and g Above r

Given: An internet-era firm is estimated to hand shareholders a steady-state cash flow of D=βˆ’2D = -2 dollars per share a year (a loss). An analyst uses r=10%r = 10\% and g=12%g = 12\% in P=D/(rβˆ’g)P = D/(r - g).

What number does the formula return?

What should the analyst conclude?

βœ… Correct! A positive number from a negative cash flow, larger the deeper the loss, is the perverse result the video warns of: the model is being used outside its range.
❌ Check the sign of the denominator. rβˆ’g=0.10βˆ’0.12=βˆ’0.02r - g = 0.10 - 0.12 = -0.02, and a negative divided by a negative is positive.
❌ Not quite. βˆ’2/0.10-2/0.10 is the no-growth perpetuity; the formula here divides by rβˆ’gr - g.
❌ Not quite. βˆ’2/0.12-2/0.12 divides by the growth rate alone. The denominator is rβˆ’g=0.10βˆ’0.12=βˆ’0.02r - g = 0.10 - 0.12 = -0.02.
❌ Check the arithmetic. Compute rβˆ’gr - g first, then divide DD by it.
❌ That is the perverse result itself. The arithmetic is right, βˆ’4/(βˆ’0.02)=200-4/(-0.02) = 200, but losses raising value is the sign that the model is misused, not a valuation.
❌ Not quite. Using the steady-state dividend does not rescue a formula whose condition r>gr > g fails.
❌ Not quite. βˆ’2Γ—1.12/(βˆ’0.02)=112-2 \times 1.12/(-0.02) = 112: still positive. The trouble is g>rg > r, not the timing of DD.
❌ Not quite. Ask whether the formula's condition r>gr > g holds here.
Show solution
P=Drβˆ’g=βˆ’20.10βˆ’0.12=βˆ’2βˆ’0.02=100P = \frac{D}{r - g} = \frac{-2}{0.10 - 0.12} = \frac{-2}{-0.02} = 100

The Gordon model requires r>gr > g. Inside that range a negative DD gives a negative price, which already makes no sense. Outside it, as here, the formula gives a positive number, and a deeper loss gives a larger one: βˆ’4/(βˆ’0.02)=200-4/(-0.02) = 200. That is the sign of misuse. P=D/(rβˆ’g)P = D/(r-g) is a steady-state expression, so the years of zero or negative cash flow, while the firm invests to grow, have to be modelled explicitly, one period at a time.

Solved: 0 / 4