The answer is a list of length 4, not a number: addition in Fn never mixes different coordinates.
Problem 2 Β· Lists or Sets?
Which of these equalities is true?
β Correct! A set ignores order and repetition, so {7,2,7} and {2,7} have exactly the same elements.
β Not quite. In a list order matters: the first coordinates are 3 and 5, which differ.
β Not quite. In a list repetition has meaning: these lists have lengths 2 and 3, so they are not equal. (The sets {4,4} and {4,4,4} are equal.)
β Not quite.() has length 0, while (0) is a list of length 1 whose only entry is the number 0.
β Not quite. Lists are equal exactly when they have the same length and the same elements in the same order.
Show solution
(a) False: same length 2, but the first coordinates 3ξ =5.
(b) False: lengths 2ξ =3.
(c) False: lengths 0ξ =1.
(d) True: both sets have exactly the elements 2 and 7; writing 7 twice adds nothing.
Problem 3 Β· Sum and Zero in CΒ²
Given:x=(2+i,Β 3i) and y=(1βi,Β 4) in C2 β findx+y, and the element wβC2 with x+w=x.
What is x + y?
Which w satisfies x + w = x?
β Correct!x+y=(3,Β 4+3i), and the zero list (0,0) is the additive identity: x+(0,0)=(2+i+0,Β 3i+0)=x.
β Check the first coordinate.(2+i)+(1βi)=3+(iβi)=3.
β Not quite.3i+4 is the complex number 4+3i; a real part and an imaginary part do not combine into 7i.
β Not quite. That adds all four entries into one complex number. The sum of two elements of C2 is a list of length 2.
β Not quite. Adding w must leave every coordinate of x unchanged.
β Not quite. The sum of an element of C2 and a number has not been defined, so x+0 only makes sense with 0 the zero list (0,0).
β Not quite. That w is βx: it gives x+w=(0,0), not x.
Show solution
Sum. Add corresponding coordinates, using complex addition in each:
x+y=((2+i)+(1βi),Β 3i+4)=(3,Β 4+3i).
Identity. Write w=(w1β,w2β). Then x+w=(2+i+w1β,Β 3i+w2β), which equals x exactly when 2+i+w1β=2+i and 3i+w2β=3i, that is w1β=w2β=0. So w=(0,0), the zero list of C2.
Problem 4 Β· Transfer: Associativity
Given: the proof that (x+y)+z=x+(y+z) for x,y,zβFn, written like the commutativity proof:
β Correct! Each coordinate changes from (xkβ+ykβ)+zkβ to xkβ+(ykβ+zkβ), which is associativity of scalars, and lists with equal coordinates are equal.
β Not quite. No two terms change places in the middle line; only the grouping of the parentheses changes.
β Not quite. That is the statement being proved, so using it would be circular.
β Not quite. The definition of addition in Fn produces the first and last equalities. The middle one changes what happens inside each coordinate.
β Not quite. Look at what changes inside a single coordinate.
Show solution
The first equality applies the definition of addition in Fn twice (first x+y, then adding z). In the middle equality, coordinate k changes from (xkβ+ykβ)+zkβ to xkβ+(ykβ+zkβ), which is associativity of addition in F. It is used n times, once per coordinate, and lists whose coordinates agree are equal. The last equality reads the definition of addition in Fn from right to left.
The pattern is the same as in the commutativity proof: the property in Fn is inherited coordinate by coordinate from the same property in F.