Linear-Algebra-Done-Right · Unit 18 · Video 4 · Interactive Practice

Normal Operators: ∥Tv∥=∥T∗v∥\|Tv\| = \|T^*v\| and Orthogonal Eigenvectors

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameWhat it says
TT∗=T∗TTT^* = T^*TNormal operatorTT commutes with its adjoint; every self-adjoint operator is normal
∥Tv∥=∥T∗v∥\|Tv\| = \|T^*v\| for every v∈Vv \in VNorm characterizationEquivalent to TT being normal
Tv=λv  ⟺  T∗v=λ‾vTv = \lambda v \iff T^*v = \overline{\lambda} vShared eigenvectorsHolds when TT is normal; then null⁡T=null⁡T∗\operatorname{null} T = \operatorname{null} T^* and range⁡T=range⁡T∗\operatorname{range} T = \operatorname{range} T^*
A=T+T∗2A = \frac{T + T^*}{2}, B=T−T∗2iB = \frac{T - T^*}{2i}, T=A+iBT = A + iBReal and imaginary parts (F=C\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{C})AA, BB are self-adjoint; TT is normal   ⟺  AB=BA\iff AB = BA

Key Insight: If TT is normal, Tu=αuTu = \alpha u, Tv=βvTv = \beta v and α≠β\alpha \ne \beta, then (α−β)⟨u,v⟩=⟨Tu,v⟩−⟨u,T∗v⟩=0(\alpha - \beta)\langle u, v \rangle = \langle Tu, v \rangle - \langle u, T^*v \rangle = 0, so u⊥vu \perp v.

IIComparing ∥Tv∥\|Tv\| With ∥T∗v∥\|T^*v\|

TT is normal exactly when the circles of radius ∥Tv∥\|Tv\| and ∥T∗v∥\|T^*v\| coincide for every vv.

💡 For NN, the vector e1e_1 has ∥Ne1∥=0\|Ne_1\| = 0 but ∥N∗e1∥=1\|N^*e_1\| = 1: e1∈null⁡Ne_1 \in \operatorname{null} N yet e1∉null⁡N∗e_1 \notin \operatorname{null} N^*, which a normal operator never allows.

IIIOrthogonal Eigenvectors

Here Tu=2uTu = 2u and Tw=−wTw = -w; this TT is normal exactly when u⊥wu \perp w.

IVReal and Imaginary Parts: T=A+iBT = A + iB

Every operator on C2\mathbf{C}^2 splits as A+iBA + iB with AA, BB self-adjoint; normality is exactly AB=BAAB = BA.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 · Norms of TvTv and T∗vT^*v

Given: T∈L(F2)T \in \mathcal{L}(\mathbf{F}^2) has standard matrix (1101)\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, and v=(1,1)v = (1, 1).

Compute ∥Tv∥\|Tv\| and ∥T∗v∥\|T^*v\|.

Is TT normal?

✅ Correct! Equal norms at one vector prove nothing; a single vector with ∥Tv∥≠∥T∗v∥\|Tv\| \ne \|T^*v\|, here e2e_2, proves TT is not normal.
❌ Not quite. (1,1)↦(0,1)(1, 1) \mapsto (0, 1) is what T−1T^{-1} does. The adjoint's matrix is the conjugate transpose (1011)\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, so T∗v=(1,2)T^*v = (1, 2).
❌ Not quite. 3=2+13 = 2 + 1 adds the coordinates of Tv=(2,1)Tv = (2, 1). The norm is 22+12=5\sqrt{2^2 + 1^2} = \sqrt{5}.
❌ Not quite. The characterization needs ∥Tv∥=∥T∗v∥\|Tv\| = \|T^*v\| for every vv. Try v=e2v = e_2: Te2=(1,1)Te_2 = (1, 1) but T∗e2=(0,1)T^*e_2 = (0, 1).
❌ Not quite. Invertibility and the eigenvalues say nothing about whether TT commutes with T∗T^*. Here TT∗=(2111)TT^* = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix} while T∗T=(1112)T^*T = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \end{pmatrix}.
Show solution

The standard basis is orthonormal, so M(T∗)\mathcal{M}(T^*) is the conjugate transpose:

M(T∗)=(1011).\mathcal{M}(T^*) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}.

For v=(1,1)v = (1, 1): Tv=(2,1)Tv = (2, 1) and T∗v=(1,2)T^*v = (1, 2), so ∥Tv∥=∥T∗v∥=5\|Tv\| = \|T^*v\| = \sqrt{5}.

For e2=(0,1)e_2 = (0, 1): Te2=(1,1)Te_2 = (1, 1) and T∗e2=(0,1)T^*e_2 = (0, 1), so

∥Te2∥=2≠1=∥T∗e2∥.\|Te_2\| = \sqrt{2} \ne 1 = \|T^*e_2\|.

Since TT is normal if and only if ∥Tv∥=∥T∗v∥\|Tv\| = \|T^*v\| for every vv, the vector e2e_2 shows TT is not normal. Directly: TT∗=(2111)≠(1112)=T∗TTT^* = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \ne \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \end{pmatrix} = T^*T.

Problem 2 · Normal or Not?

Given: operators on C2\mathbf{C}^2 described by their matrices with respect to the standard basis.

Which of these operators is normal?

The operator with matrix (i1−1i)\begin{pmatrix} i & 1 \\ -1 & i \end{pmatrix} is …

✅ Correct! (11−11)\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ -1 & 1 \end{pmatrix} has TT∗=T∗T=2ITT^* = T^*T = 2I, and (i1−1i)\begin{pmatrix} i & 1 \\ -1 & i \end{pmatrix} satisfies T∗=−TT^* = -T, which commutes with TT.
❌ Not quite. Distinct eigenvalues 11, 22 do not make an operator normal. Its eigenvectors (1,0)(1, 0) and (1,1)(1, 1) are not orthogonal, which is impossible for a normal operator; indeed TT∗=(2224)≠(1115)=T∗TTT^* = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 2 \\ 2 & 4 \end{pmatrix} \ne \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 5 \end{pmatrix} = T^*T.
❌ Not quite. The rotation-like pattern is misleading: the off-diagonal entries have different sizes. TT∗=(4001)TT^* = \begin{pmatrix} 4 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} but T∗T=(1004)T^*T = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 4 \end{pmatrix}, and ∥Te1∥=1≠2=∥T∗e1∥\|Te_1\| = 1 \ne 2 = \|T^*e_1\|.
❌ Not quite. A scalar diagonal does not rescue the off-diagonal 11: T=iI+ET = iI + E with E=(0100)E = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, and TT is normal only if EE is (part 4 with λ=i\lambda = i). But EE∗≠E∗EEE^* \ne E^*E; numerically TT∗=(2−ii1)≠(1−ii2)=T∗TTT^* = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & -i \\ i & 1 \end{pmatrix} \ne \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -i \\ i & 2 \end{pmatrix} = T^*T.
❌ Not quite. Self-adjoint requires each diagonal entry to equal its own conjugate, but i‾=−i≠i\overline{i} = -i \ne i. The conjugate transpose is (−i−11−i)=−T\begin{pmatrix} -i & -1 \\ 1 & -i \end{pmatrix} = -T.
❌ Not quite. Real eigenvalues are a property of self-adjoint operators; normal operators may have any complex eigenvalues. Here T∗=−TT^* = -T, so TT∗=−T2=T∗TTT^* = -T^2 = T^*T and TT is normal.
Show solution

Compute TT∗TT^* and T∗TT^*T with M(T∗)=M(T)‾ t\mathcal{M}(T^*) = \overline{\mathcal{M}(T)}^{\,t}.

(11−11)(1−111)=(2002)=(1−111)(11−11),\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ -1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ -1 & 1 \end{pmatrix},

so (d) is normal. The others fail: (a) gives (2224)\begin{pmatrix} 2 & 2 \\ 2 & 4 \end{pmatrix} versus (1115)\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 5 \end{pmatrix}, (b) gives (4001)\begin{pmatrix} 4 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} versus (1004)\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 4 \end{pmatrix}, (c) gives (2−ii1)\begin{pmatrix} 2 & -i \\ i & 1 \end{pmatrix} versus (1−ii2)\begin{pmatrix} 1 & -i \\ i & 2 \end{pmatrix}.

For T=(i1−1i)T = \begin{pmatrix} i & 1 \\ -1 & i \end{pmatrix}: conjugating and transposing gives T∗=(−i−11−i)=−TT^* = \begin{pmatrix} -i & -1 \\ 1 & -i \end{pmatrix} = -T. So T∗≠TT^* \ne T (not self-adjoint), but TT∗=−T2=T∗TTT^* = -T^2 = T^*T (normal).

Problem 3 · Splitting T=A+iBT = A + iB

Given: T∈L(C2)T \in \mathcal{L}(\mathbf{C}^2) with standard matrix (12i03)\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2i \\ 0 & 3 \end{pmatrix}. Find A=T+T∗2A = \frac{T + T^*}{2}, B=T−T∗2iB = \frac{T - T^*}{2i}, and decide whether TT is normal.

What is M(A)\mathcal{M}(A)?

What is M(B)\mathcal{M}(B)?

Is TT normal?

✅ Correct! AA and BB are self-adjoint with T=A+iBT = A + iB, but AB=(i13−i)≠(−i31i)=BAAB = \begin{pmatrix} i & 1 \\ 3 & -i \end{pmatrix} \ne \begin{pmatrix} -i & 3 \\ 1 & i \end{pmatrix} = BA, so TT is not normal.
❌ Not quite. That is the entrywise real part of the matrix. A=T+T∗2A = \frac{T + T^*}{2} also mixes the off-diagonal entries: its (1,2)(1,2) entry is 2i+0‾2=i\frac{2i + \overline{0}}{2} = i.
❌ Not quite. You used the transpose without conjugating. With M(T∗)=(10−2i3)\mathcal{M}(T^*) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ -2i & 3 \end{pmatrix} the (2,1)(2,1) entry of AA is 0+(−2i)2=−i\frac{0 + (-2i)}{2} = -i; a self-adjoint matrix needs a21=a12‾a_{21} = \overline{a_{12}}.
❌ Not quite. That is T+T∗T + T^*; divide by 22.
❌ Not quite. That is T−T∗2=iB\frac{T - T^*}{2} = iB; dividing it by ii gives BB.
❌ Not quite. That is the entrywise imaginary part, which is not even self-adjoint. Compute T−T∗=(02i2i0)T - T^* = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2i \\ 2i & 0 \end{pmatrix} and divide by 2i2i.
❌ Not quite. You used the transpose without conjugating: T−Tt=(02i−2i0)T - T^{t} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2i \\ -2i & 0 \end{pmatrix}. With T∗T^* the (2,1)(2,1) entry of T−T∗T - T^* is 0−(−2i)=2i0 - (-2i) = 2i.
❌ Not quite. AA and BB are self-adjoint for every operator on a complex space; the theorem needs them to commute as well.
❌ Not quite. tr⁡(AB)=tr⁡(BA)\operatorname{tr}(AB) = \operatorname{tr}(BA) holds for any two square matrices, so it cannot detect normality. The products themselves differ.
Show solution

The adjoint's matrix is the conjugate transpose: M(T∗)=(10−2i3)\mathcal{M}(T^*) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ -2i & 3 \end{pmatrix}.

A=12(22i−2i6)=(1i−i3),B=12i(02i2i0)=(0110).A = \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 2 & 2i \\ -2i & 6 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & i \\ -i & 3 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad B = \frac{1}{2i}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2i \\ 2i & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}.

Check: A+iB=(1i+i−i+i3)=(12i03)=TA + iB = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & i + i \\ -i + i & 3 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2i \\ 0 & 3 \end{pmatrix} = T.

AB=(i13−i),BA=(−i31i).AB = \begin{pmatrix} i & 1 \\ 3 & -i \end{pmatrix}, \qquad BA = \begin{pmatrix} -i & 3 \\ 1 & i \end{pmatrix}.

Since AB≠BAAB \ne BA, TT is not normal. (Consistently, AB−BA=T∗T−TT∗2i≠0AB - BA = \frac{T^*T - TT^*}{2i} \ne 0.)

Problem 4 · The Cyclic Permutation

Given: P∈L(C3)P \in \mathcal{L}(\mathbf{C}^3), P(x,y,z)=(z,x,y)P(x, y, z) = (z, x, y), which is normal since PP∗=P∗P=IPP^* = P^*P = I. Let ω=e2πi/3\omega = e^{2\pi i/3} and w=(1,ω2,ω)w = (1, \omega^2, \omega), so that Pw=ωwPw = \omega w. Find P∗wP^*w.

✅ Correct! For a normal operator Tv=λv  ⟺  T∗v=λ‾vTv = \lambda v \iff T^*v = \overline{\lambda} v, and ω‾=ω2\overline{\omega} = \omega^2 because ∣ω∣=1|\omega| = 1 and ω3=1\omega^3 = 1.
❌ Not quite. The eigenvalue must be conjugated: T∗v=λ‾vT^*v = \overline{\lambda} v. Since ω\omega is not real, ω‾=ω2≠ω\overline{\omega} = \omega^2 \ne \omega.
❌ Not quite. P∗P^* is the inverse permutation (x,y,z)↦(y,z,x)(x, y, z) \mapsto (y, z, x), not the identity; it scales ww by ω‾\overline{\omega}, not by 11.
❌ Not quite. An operator and its adjoint can have different eigenvectors in general, but not when the operator is normal: every eigenvector of PP is an eigenvector of P∗P^*.
Show solution

The matrix of PP is a permutation matrix, so its conjugate transpose is its transpose and P∗(x,y,z)=(y,z,x)P^*(x, y, z) = (y, z, x). Then PP∗=P∗P=IPP^* = P^*P = I, so PP is normal.

By part 5 of the theorem, Pw=ωwPw = \omega w implies P∗w=ω‾wP^*w = \overline{\omega} w. Since ωω‾=∣ω∣2=1\omega\overline{\omega} = |\omega|^2 = 1 and ω3=1\omega^3 = 1, ω‾=ω−1=ω2\overline{\omega} = \omega^{-1} = \omega^2.

Direct check: P∗w=(ω2,ω,1)P^*w = (\omega^2, \omega, 1), and ω2w=(ω2,ω4,ω3)=(ω2,ω,1)\omega^2 w = (\omega^2, \omega^4, \omega^3) = (\omega^2, \omega, 1). So P∗w=ω2wP^*w = \omega^2 w.

Solved: 0 / 4