Linear-Algebra-Done-Right · Unit 24 · Video 4 · Interactive Practice

Nilpotent Operators: Zero Is the Only Eigenvalue

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameHypotheses
Tk=0T^k = 0 for some k≥1k \ge 1   ⟺  \iff every v≠0v \neq 0 is a generalized eigenvector of TT for 00Nilpotent, two waysVV finite-dimensional, any F\mathbf{F}
TT nilpotent ⇒Tdim⁡V=0\Rightarrow T^{\dim V} = 0The power never exceeds the dimensionVV finite-dimensional, any F\mathbf{F}
TT nilpotent ⇒\Rightarrow 00 is the only eigenvalue of TT; conversely, 00 the only eigenvalue ⇒\Rightarrow TT nilpotentEigenvalues of a nilpotent operatorV≠{0}V \neq \{0\} finite-dimensional; the first statement for any F\mathbf{F}, the converse only for F=C\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{C} (it fails over R\mathbf{R})
TT nilpotent   ⟺  \iff minimal polynomial zmz^m   ⟺  \iff M(T)\mathcal{M}(T) strictly upper triangular for some basisThree equivalent descriptionsV≠{0}V \neq \{0\} finite-dimensional, any F\mathbf{F}

Key Insight: If the minimal polynomial of TT is zmz^m, then Tm=0T^m = 0 but Tm−1≠0T^{m-1} \neq 0, so mm is the smallest power that vanishes; it can be less than dim⁡V\dim V, never more.

IIA Power That Vanishes

Each nilpotent operator from the video reaches the zero operator at a power no larger than dim⁡V\dim V.

IIIZeros Climb One Diagonal per Power

In each power of a strictly upper-triangular n×nn \times n matrix the zeros climb one diagonal, so Tn=0T^n = 0.

IVOver R\mathbf{R}, Only Eigenvalue 00 Is Not Enough

On R3\mathbf{R}^3, an operator whose only real eigenvalue is 00 can still have no power equal to 00.

💡 Over C\mathbf{C} the operator TT also has the eigenvalues ii and −i-i, so it does not meet the hypothesis of the converse, and there is no contradiction.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 · The Second Derivative on P4(R)\mathcal{P}_4(\mathbf{R})

Given: T∈L(P4(R))T \in \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{P}_4(\mathbf{R})), Tp=p′′Tp = p'' — find the smallest positive integer kk with Tk=0T^k = 0, and the minimal polynomial of TT.

Smallest kk with Tk=0T^k = 0

Minimal polynomial of TT

✅ Correct! T3p=p(6)=0T^3 p = p^{(6)} = 0 for every pp of degree at most 44, while T2(x4)=24T^2(x^4) = 24, so the minimal polynomial is z3z^3; the smallest vanishing power 33 is less than dim⁡P4(R)=5\dim \mathcal{P}_4(\mathbf{R}) = 5.
❌ Not the smallest. T5=0T^5 = 0 is the guaranteed bound Tdim⁡V=0T^{\dim V} = 0, but already T3p=p(6)=0T^3 p = p^{(6)} = 0: six derivatives kill every polynomial of degree at most 44.
❌ T2T^2 is not zero. T2p=p(4)T^2 p = p^{(4)}, and T2(x4)=4!=24≠0T^2(x^4) = 4! = 24 \neq 0.
❌ T4=0T^4 = 0 is true, but not the first. T3pT^3 p is the sixth derivative of pp, which is already 00 when deg⁡p≤4\deg p \le 4.
❌ Not minimal. z5z^5 does send TT to 00, but so does the lower-degree monic polynomial z3z^3.
❌ z2z^2 does not send TT to 00. T2(x4)=24≠0T^2(x^4) = 24 \neq 0, so T2≠0T^2 \neq 0.
❌ The zeros of the minimal polynomial are the eigenvalues. 11 is not an eigenvalue of the nilpotent operator TT; its only eigenvalue is 00.
Show solution

TkpT^k p is the (2k)(2k)-th derivative of pp. Five derivatives already send every polynomial of degree at most 44 to 00, so

T3p=p(6)=0 for every p∈P4(R),so T3=0.T^3 p = p^{(6)} = 0 \text{ for every } p \in \mathcal{P}_4(\mathbf{R}), \qquad \text{so } T^3 = 0.

No smaller power works: T2(x4)=(x4)(4)=4⋅3⋅2⋅1=24≠0T^2(x^4) = (x^4)^{(4)} = 4 \cdot 3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1 = 24 \neq 0, so T2≠0T^2 \neq 0 (and T≠0T \neq 0, since T(x2)=2T(x^2) = 2).

TT is nilpotent, so its minimal polynomial is zmz^m for some mm. Since z3z^3 sends TT to 00, zmz^m divides z3z^3, so m≤3m \le 3; and m≤2m \le 2 would give T2=0T^2 = 0. Hence the minimal polynomial is z3z^3. The smallest vanishing power 33 is below the bound dim⁡P4(R)=5\dim \mathcal{P}_4(\mathbf{R}) = 5 (basis 1,x,x2,x3,x41, x, x^2, x^3, x^4).

Problem 2 · Smaller Than the Dimension

Given: T∈L(F4)T \in \mathcal{L}(\mathbf{F}^4) with matrix N=(01200002000−10000)N = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} in the standard basis — find the smallest positive integer kk with Tk=0T^k = 0.

✅ Correct! The only entry of N2N^2 that could be nonzero is the (1,4)(1,4) entry, and it is 1⋅2+2⋅(−1)=01 \cdot 2 + 2 \cdot (-1) = 0.
❌ That is the guaranteed bound, not the smallest power. Tdim⁡V=T4=0T^{\dim V} = T^4 = 0 holds, but a smaller power already vanishes.
❌ T3=0T^3 = 0 is true, but not the first. Compute N2N^2: its (1,4)(1,4) entry is 1⋅2+2⋅(−1)1 \cdot 2 + 2 \cdot (-1), and the two products cancel.
❌ T≠0T \neq 0. NN has nonzero entries, for instance N1,2=1N_{1,2} = 1.
Show solution

NN is strictly upper triangular, so an entry (i,j)(i, j) of N2N^2 is a sum of products Ni,lNl,jN_{i,l} N_{l,j} with i<l<ji < l < j; only (1,3)(1,3), (1,4)(1,4), (2,4)(2,4) can be nonzero:

(N2)1,3=N1,2N2,3=1⋅0=0,(N2)2,4=N2,3N3,4=0⋅(−1)=0,(N^2)_{1,3} = N_{1,2} N_{2,3} = 1 \cdot 0 = 0, \qquad (N^2)_{2,4} = N_{2,3} N_{3,4} = 0 \cdot (-1) = 0, (N2)1,4=N1,2N2,4+N1,3N3,4=1⋅2+2⋅(−1)=0.(N^2)_{1,4} = N_{1,2} N_{2,4} + N_{1,3} N_{3,4} = 1 \cdot 2 + 2 \cdot (-1) = 0.

So N2=0N^2 = 0, while N≠0N \neq 0. The smallest power is k=2k = 2, below the bound dim⁡F4=4\dim \mathbf{F}^4 = 4; the minimal polynomial of TT is z2z^2.

Problem 3 · Minimal Polynomial of a 5×55 \times 5 Matrix

Given: T∈L(C5)T \in \mathcal{L}(\mathbf{C}^5) with matrix N=(010200010−1000030000100000)N = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 & 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} in the standard basis — find the minimal polynomial of TT.

✅ Correct! N3N^3 has the single nonzero entry (N3)1,5=3(N^3)_{1,5} = 3 and N4=0N^4 = 0, so the minimal polynomial is z4z^4.
❌ z5z^5 sends TT to 00, but it is not minimal. Already N4=0N^4 = 0, and z4z^4 has smaller degree.
❌ N3≠0N^3 \neq 0. Its (1,5)(1,5) entry is N1,2N2,3N3,5=1⋅1⋅3=3N_{1,2} N_{2,3} N_{3,5} = 1 \cdot 1 \cdot 3 = 3.
❌ N2≠0N^2 \neq 0. For instance (N2)1,3=N1,2N2,3=1(N^2)_{1,3} = N_{1,2} N_{2,3} = 1.
Show solution

NN is strictly upper triangular, so TT is nilpotent and its minimal polynomial is zmz^m with mm the smallest power for which Nm=0N^m = 0. Compute the powers:

N2=(0010100003000000000000000),N3=N2N=(0000300000000000000000000).N^2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad N^3 = N^2 N = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}.

For example (N2)1,5=N1,2N2,5+N1,4N4,5=1⋅(−1)+2⋅1=1(N^2)_{1,5} = N_{1,2} N_{2,5} + N_{1,4} N_{4,5} = 1 \cdot (-1) + 2 \cdot 1 = 1 and (N3)1,5=(N2)1,3N3,5=1⋅3=3(N^3)_{1,5} = (N^2)_{1,3} N_{3,5} = 1 \cdot 3 = 3. Then N4=N3NN^4 = N^3 N has rows that are multiples of row 55 of NN, which is zero, so N4=0N^4 = 0.

Since N3≠0N^3 \neq 0 and N4=0N^4 = 0, the minimal polynomial of TT is z4z^4 — one less than dim⁡C5=5\dim \mathbf{C}^5 = 5.

Problem 4 · A Real Operator

Given: T∈L(R3)T \in \mathcal{L}(\mathbf{R}^3), T(x,y,z)=(0, y−2z, y+z)T(x, y, z) = (0,\ y - 2z,\ y + z) — decide which statement is true.

✅ Correct! Te1=0Te_1 = 0 and the yzyz-plane holds no real eigenvector, yet TT is injective on the yzyz-plane, so Tk(0,1,0)≠0T^k(0, 1, 0) \neq 0 for every kk.
❌ That converse needs F=C\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{C}. Over C\mathbf{C} this TT also has the eigenvalues 1±2 i1 \pm \sqrt{2}\, i, and over R\mathbf{R} no power of TT is 00.
❌ Tdim⁡V=0T^{\dim V} = 0 holds only for nilpotent TT. Here T3(0,1,0)=(0,−5,1)≠0T^3(0, 1, 0) = (0, -5, 1) \neq 0.
❌ The matrix is not upper triangular, so its diagonal says nothing about eigenvalues. T(x,y,z)=(x,y,z)T(x, y, z) = (x, y, z) forces x=0x = 0, and then y−2z=yy - 2z = y and y+z=zy + z = z give z=0z = 0 and y=0y = 0, so there is no eigenvector for 11.
Show solution

00 is an eigenvalue: T(1,0,0)=(0,0,0)T(1, 0, 0) = (0, 0, 0).

No other real eigenvalue: if T(x,y,z)=λ(x,y,z)T(x, y, z) = \lambda (x, y, z) with λ≠0\lambda \neq 0, the first coordinate gives λx=0\lambda x = 0, so x=0x = 0, and then

y−2z=λy,y+z=λz⟹y=(λ−1)z,(1−λ)(λ−1)z=2z.y - 2z = \lambda y, \qquad y + z = \lambda z \quad\Longrightarrow\quad y = (\lambda - 1) z, \quad (1 - \lambda)(\lambda - 1) z = 2z.

If z≠0z \neq 0 this says (λ−1)2=−2(\lambda - 1)^2 = -2, impossible for real λ\lambda; if z=0z = 0 then y=0y = 0 and the vector is 00. So 00 is the only real eigenvalue.

Not nilpotent: TT maps the yzyz-plane into itself, and there T(0,y,z)=0T(0, y, z) = 0 forces y−2z=0y - 2z = 0 and y+z=0y + z = 0, so y=z=0y = z = 0: TT is injective on that plane. Every power of TT is then injective on it too, so Tk(0,1,0)≠0T^k(0, 1, 0) \neq 0 for every kk — for instance T3(0,1,0)=(0,−5,1)T^3(0, 1, 0) = (0, -5, 1).

Over C\mathbf{C}, (λ−1)2=−2(\lambda - 1)^2 = -2 has the solutions λ=1±2 i\lambda = 1 \pm \sqrt{2}\, i, so TT does not satisfy the hypothesis "00 is the only eigenvalue" of the converse, which needs F=C\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{C}.

Solved: 0 / 4