LINEAR-ALGEBRA

Cracking the Characteristic Equation

IKey Formulas

Formula Name Description
Ax=λxA\mathbf{x} = \lambda \mathbf{x} Eigenvalue equation λ\lambda = eigenvalue, x\mathbf{x} = eigenvector
det(AλI)=0\det(A - \lambda I) = 0 Characteristic equation Polynomial whose roots are eigenvalues
(AλiI)x=0(A - \lambda_i I)\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{0} Eigenvector equation Null space gives eigenvectors
λi=tr(A),λi=det(A)\sum \lambda_i = \text{tr}(A), \quad \prod \lambda_i = \det(A) Sanity checks Trace & determinant relations

IIVisualization 1 — Eigenvectors Don't Rotate

Only along an eigenvector does AxA\mathbf{x} stay on the same line — a pure stretch, no turn.

💡 The two stretch factors λ=2\lambda = 2 and λ=4\lambda = 4 are exactly the roots of the characteristic equation λ26λ+8=0\lambda^2 - 6\lambda + 8 = 0 — the equation this lesson solves.

IIIVisualization 2 — Adding cIcI Shifts the Eigenvalues

Add cIcI to a matrix and every eigenvalue slides by cc — yet no eigenvector moves.

💡 The shift is exact: (P+cI)x=Px+cx=(λ+c)x(P + cI)\mathbf{x} = P\mathbf{x} + c\mathbf{x} = (\lambda + c)\mathbf{x}, so II hands its own eigenvalue cc to every direction at once.

IVVisualization 3 — The Characteristic Polynomial

The eigenvalues of AA are the roots of p(λ)=det(AλI)p(\lambda) = \det(A - \lambda I) — where its curve crosses zero.

💡 For any 2×22\times 2 matrix the characteristic equation is λ2(trA)λ+detA=0\lambda^2 - (\operatorname{tr}A)\,\lambda + \det A = 0 — read its coefficients straight off the trace and determinant.

VQuiz Questions

Question 1 · Compute the Characteristic Polynomial

For the matrix A=[5225]A = \begin{bmatrix} 5 & 2 \\ 2 & 5 \end{bmatrix}, what is the characteristic polynomial det(AλI)\det(A - \lambda I)?

Correct! You properly subtracted the off-diagonal product.

Not quite. You forgot to subtract 2×2=42 \times 2 = 4 from the diagonal product.

Sign error. The coefficient of λ\lambda should be (a+d)-(a+d), so 10-10 not +10+10.

Not quite. Remember the trace is 5+5=105+5=10, not 77.

Not quite. Try again — the hints above can help.

Show solution

Solution:

Form AλI=[5λ225λ]A - \lambda I = \begin{bmatrix} 5-\lambda & 2 \\ 2 & 5-\lambda \end{bmatrix}.

Compute the determinant: det(AλI)=(5λ)(5λ)(2)(2)=2510λ+λ24=λ210λ+21\det(A - \lambda I) = (5-\lambda)(5-\lambda) - (2)(2) = 25 - 10\lambda + \lambda^2 - 4 = \lambda^2 - 10\lambda + 21

Sanity check: trace =5+5=10= 5 + 5 = 10 (coefficient of λ-\lambda), determinant =254=21= 25 - 4 = 21 (constant term).

The eigenvalues are roots: λ=7\lambda = 7 and λ=3\lambda = 3.

Question 2 · Finding the Eigenvector

For A=[4213]A = \begin{bmatrix} 4 & 2 \\ 1 & 3 \end{bmatrix}, one eigenvalue is λ=5\lambda = 5. Which vector is a corresponding eigenvector?

Correct! A[2,1]T=[10,5]T=5[2,1]TA[2,1]^T = [10, 5]^T = 5 \cdot [2,1]^T.

Components swapped. Check: A[1,2]T=[8,7]TA[1,2]^T = [8, 7]^T, which is NOT a scalar multiple of [1,2][1,2].

Not quite. A[1,1]T=[6,4]TA[1,1]^T = [6, 4]^T, not a scalar multiple of [1,1][1,1].

Sign error. Row reduction gives x1=2x2x_1 = 2x_2, so components have the same sign.

Not quite. Try again — the hints above can help.

Show solution

Solution:

Form A5I=[452135]=[1212]A - 5I = \begin{bmatrix} 4-5 & 2 \\ 1 & 3-5 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 2 \\ 1 & -2 \end{bmatrix}.

Row reduce: R2R2+R1R_2 \leftarrow R_2 + R_1 gives [1200]\begin{bmatrix} -1 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.

From row 1: x1+2x2=0-x_1 + 2x_2 = 0, so x1=2x2x_1 = 2x_2. Setting x2=1x_2 = 1 gives x=[2,1]\mathbf{x} = [2, 1].

Verify: A[2,1]T=[4(2)+2(1),1(2)+3(1)]T=[10,5]T=5[2,1]TA[2,1]^T = [4(2)+2(1), 1(2)+3(1)]^T = [10, 5]^T = 5 \cdot [2, 1]^T

Question 3 · The Shift Property

Suppose the matrix BB has eigenvalues {2,1,5}\{-2, 1, 5\} with eigenvectors v1,v2,v3\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \mathbf{v}_3. What are the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of B+4IB + 4I?

Correct! Adding cIcI shifts each eigenvalue by cc while eigenvectors stay fixed.

Not quite. Eigenvalues DO change (they shift), but eigenvectors stay the same.

That's for multiplication. Eigenvalues of cAcA are cλic\lambda_i. But we're adding 4I4I, which shifts rather than scales.

Eigenvalues are right, but eigenvectors don't rotate. Adding cIcI leaves eigenvectors completely unchanged.

Not quite. Try again — the hints above can help.

Show solution

Solution:

The shift property: if Bv=λvB\mathbf{v} = \lambda \mathbf{v}, then (B+cI)v=Bv+cv=λv+cv=(λ+c)v(B + cI)\mathbf{v} = B\mathbf{v} + c\mathbf{v} = \lambda\mathbf{v} + c\mathbf{v} = (\lambda + c)\mathbf{v}

So adding cIcI:

  • Shifts each eigenvalue by cc: {2,1,5}{2,5,9}\{-2, 1, 5\} \to \{2, 5, 9\}
  • Preserves all eigenvectors unchanged

This works because the identity matrix II has every vector as an eigenvector, so it automatically shares eigenvectors with any matrix.

Question 4 · True or False — Eigenvalues of a Sum

Claim: For any two square matrices AA and BB of the same size, the eigenvalues of A+BA + B equal the sum of eigenvalues of AA and BB.

Is this claim true or false?

Correct! The rule requires a shared eigenvector — that's why cIcI is the special case where it always works.

This is a common trap. The algebra only works if x\mathbf{x} is an eigenvector of both AA and BB, which is usually NOT the case.

Not quite. Try again — the hints above can help.

Show solution

Solution:

The claim is FALSE in general.

The flawed argument goes: if Ax=λxA\mathbf{x} = \lambda \mathbf{x} and Bx=αxB\mathbf{x} = \alpha \mathbf{x}, then (A+B)x=(λ+α)x(A+B)\mathbf{x} = (\lambda + \alpha)\mathbf{x}.

The hidden assumption is that the same vector x\mathbf{x} is an eigenvector of both AA and BB. Different matrices usually have eigenvectors pointing in completely different directions!

Why cIcI escapes this trap: the identity matrix II has every nonzero vector as an eigenvector, so it automatically shares eigenvectors with any matrix AA. That's the special case where additivity works.

Counterexample: Let A=[1000]A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} (eigenvalues 0, 1) and B=[0110]B = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} (eigenvalues 1,1-1, 1). Then A+B=[1110]A+B = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} has eigenvalues 1±52\frac{1 \pm \sqrt{5}}{2} — definitely NOT any sum of {0,1}\{0,1\} and {1,1}\{-1,1\}.

Solved: 0 / 4