LINEAR-ALGEBRA · Interactive Practice | Unit 21 · Video 1

The Matrix Factorization That Unlocks Eigenvalues: A = SΛS⁻¹

IKey Formulas

Formula Name What It Says
Axi=λixiA x_i = \lambda_i x_i Eigenvalue equation AA stretches eigenvector xix_i by λi\lambda_i
AS=SΛAS = S\Lambda Master equation Stack eigenvectors; Λ\Lambda is diagonal of eigenvalues
A=SΛS1A = S\Lambda S^{-1} Diagonalization Valid when SS has nn independent columns
Ak=SΛkS1A^k = S\Lambda^k S^{-1} Power formula Raise each diagonal entry to the kk

IIVisualization 1 — Eigenvectors Only Stretch

In its eigenvector basis AA only stretches: eigenvectors keep their direction while a generic vector rotates.

💡 Those two directions are the only ones AA leaves unrotated — Λ\Lambda is AA written in exactly that basis.

IIIVisualization 2 — Why Powers Are Trivial

Powers of a diagonalized matrix are trivial — Λk\Lambda^k just exponentiates each eigenvalue, and the largest soon dominates.

💡 The largest λ|\lambda| sets the long-run growth rate of AkxA^k x — the engine behind difference equations, ODEs, and matrix exponentials.

IVVisualization 3 — Diagonalizable vs. Defective

Diagonalization needs two independent eigenvectors — edit AA and watch when the second direction vanishes.

💡 Distinct eigenvalues guarantee diagonalizability; symmetric matrices go further, with orthogonal eigenvectors.

VQuiz Questions

Question 1 · The Master Equation

When you stack the eigenvectors of AA as columns of SS and apply AA, you get the master equation AS=SΛAS = S\Lambda. Given

A=(4005),S=(1001),A = \begin{pmatrix} 4 & 0 \\ 0 & 5 \end{pmatrix}, \quad S = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix},

what is the diagonal eigenvalue matrix Λ\Lambda?

Correct! The ii-th diagonal entry of Λ\Lambda is the eigenvalue of the ii-th column of SS.

Not quite. Remember: the order of eigenvalues in Λ\Lambda must match the order of eigenvectors in SS.

Show solution

Solution:

Since AA is already diagonal with entries 44 and 55, its eigenvalues are λ1=4\lambda_1 = 4 (with eigenvector e1e_1) and λ2=5\lambda_2 = 5 (with eigenvector e2e_2). With S=IS = I, we have

AS=AI=A=(4005),SΛ=IΛ=Λ.AS = AI = A = \begin{pmatrix} 4 & 0 \\ 0 & 5 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad S\Lambda = I\Lambda = \Lambda.

For AS=SΛAS = S\Lambda to hold, Λ=diag(4,5)\Lambda = \text{diag}(4, 5).

The order of the diagonal entries of Λ\Lambda must match the order of eigenvectors in SS.

Question 2 · When Diagonalization Fails

True or False: Every square matrix AA can be written as A=SΛS1A = S\Lambda S^{-1}.

Correct! Defective matrices (like (2102)\begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix}) cannot be diagonalized.

Not quite. Having eigenvalues is not enough — you need nn independent eigenvectors so that S1S^{-1} exists.

Show solution

Solution:

The statement is False.

Diagonalization requires SS to be invertible, which means its columns — the eigenvectors — must be linearly independent. When AA has a repeated eigenvalue that doesn't supply enough independent eigenvectors, AA is called defective and cannot be diagonalized.

Classic example: A=(2102)A = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix}

Characteristic polynomial: (λ2)2=0(\lambda - 2)^2 = 0, so λ=2\lambda = 2 is a double eigenvalue. But solving (A2I)x=0(A - 2I)x = 0 gives only the single eigenvector direction (1,0)T(1, 0)^T. Since we need 2 independent eigenvectors but have only 1, SS is singular and A=SΛS1A = S\Lambda S^{-1} fails.

  • ❌ Not diagonalizable: defective matrices
  • Diagonalizable: matrices with nn independent eigenvectors (e.g., distinct eigenvalues, or symmetric matrices)

Question 3 · Powers Made Easy

Suppose A=SΛS1A = S\Lambda S^{-1} with Λ=diag(2,3)\Lambda = \text{diag}(2, 3). What is Λ10\Lambda^{10}, the tenth power of the eigenvalue matrix?

Correct! For a diagonal matrix, (Λk)ii=λik(\Lambda^k)_{ii} = \lambda_i^k.

Not quite. You multiplied by 10 instead of raising to the 10th power. Λ10\Lambda^{10} means ten matrix products, which for diagonals means λi10\lambda_i^{10}.

Not quite. Raise each diagonal entry to the 10th power.

Show solution

Solution:

Powers of a diagonal matrix are trivial: raise each diagonal entry to the power.

Λk=(λ1k00λ2k)\Lambda^k = \begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1^k & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2^k \end{pmatrix}

For Λ=diag(2,3)\Lambda = \text{diag}(2, 3) and k=10k = 10:

210=1024,310=590492^{10} = 1024, \quad 3^{10} = 59049

So Λ10=diag(1024,59049)\Lambda^{10} = \text{diag}(1024, 59049).

Why this matters: Using Ak=SΛkS1A^k = S\Lambda^k S^{-1}, computing A10A^{10} reduces to two scalar exponentiations plus one matrix multiply on each side — far cheaper than multiplying AA by itself 10 times.

Question 4 · What Does Λ Really Represent?

In the factorization A=SΛS1A = S\Lambda S^{-1}, which statement best describes the role of Λ\Lambda?

Correct! Λ\Lambda is AA viewed from the eigenvector basis — the world where AA is pure scaling.

Not quite. Think of S1S^{-1} as changing to the eigenvector basis, Λ\Lambda as stretching in that basis, and SS as changing back.

Show solution

Solution:

Λ\Lambda is AA expressed in the eigenvector basis. Reading A=SΛS1A = S\Lambda S^{-1} right-to-left:

  1. S1S^{-1} converts a vector from standard coordinates into eigenvector coordinates.
  2. Λ\Lambda applies AA's action in that basis — but in this basis it's just stretching (no rotation, no mixing).
  3. SS converts the result back to standard coordinates.

Important subtleties:

  • ΛA\Lambda \neq A in general. They represent the same linear map, but in different bases.
  • SS is not unique. You can reorder the eigenvectors (the columns of SS), and Λ\Lambda's diagonal reorders to match. You can also rescale any eigenvector by a nonzero constant.
  • Λ\Lambda is not the inverse of AA. (The inverse of AA, when it exists, would be SΛ1S1S\Lambda^{-1}S^{-1}.)

Solved: 0 / 4