LINEAR-ALGEBRA · Interactive Practice | Unit 27 · Video 1
| Concept | Statement | Tool to use |
|---|---|---|
| Positive definite (quadratic form) | for all | Quadratic form |
| Inverse eigenvalue | Eigenvalues | |
| Sum closure | Quadratic form | |
| identity | Norm identity | |
| Strict positive definiteness for | Requires to have independent columns | Full column rank |
For a positive-definite , every eigenvalue becomes for — positivity survives inversion.
💡 As an eigenvalue approaches , its reciprocal grows without bound — yet never turns negative, so stays positive definite.
Adding two positive-definite forms adds their bowls; the sum is a steeper bowl whose level set stays a bounded ellipse.
is positive definite exactly when the columns of are independent — otherwise it is only semi-definite.
💡 With fixed, the parallelogram's area equals — it collapses to precisely when the columns become dependent.
Question 1
A symmetric matrix has eigenvalues . What are the eigenvalues of , and is positive definite?
✅ Correct! Reciprocals of positive numbers are positive, so stays positive definite.
❌ Not quite. Use . Eigenvalues invert, but signs stay the same.
Solution:
If , then multiplying both sides by gives , so
So the eigenvalues of are the reciprocals of the eigenvalues of : .
Both reciprocals are positive (positive over positive). Since is also symmetric (because ) and all its eigenvalues are positive, is positive definite.
Question 2
True or False: If and are symmetric positive definite matrices, then the eigenvalues of are simply the sums of the eigenvalues of and .
✅ Correct! Eigenvalues don't add unless eigenvectors are shared. That's why we switch tools and use the quadratic form for the sum.
❌ Not quite. Eigenvalues of are NOT the sums of eigenvalues of and in general. This is precisely why we use the quadratic form for the sum closure proof.
Solution:
False. Eigenvalues only add when and share the same eigenvectors. In general the eigenvalues of are something else entirely.
This is exactly why the eigenvalue tool fails for the sum closure property. We have to switch to the quadratic form:
So is positive definite, even though we cannot say anything clean about its individual eigenvalues.
Question 3
Consider . Which of the following best describes ?
✅ Correct! Column 2 = 2·(Column 1), so the columns are dependent. is symmetric and PSD, but .
❌ Not quite. Check whether the columns of are independent. If column 2 is a multiple of column 1, then is singular.
Solution:
The second column of is exactly twice the first column, so the columns are dependent (rank 1).
is always symmetric: .
We compute:
The determinant is , so is singular.
The identity guarantees positive semi-definiteness, but with dependent columns there exists a nonzero (for instance ) such that , killing strict positivity.
Question 4
The normal equations for least squares are . Why is having independent columns of the crucial requirement for a unique least-squares solution?
✅ Correct! Independent columns → for → positive definite → invertible → unique .
❌ Not quite. is usually rectangular, so we can't invert directly. The trick is that is square — and it's positive definite (hence invertible) exactly when the columns of are independent.
Solution:
The chain of reasoning is:
Note: itself is typically rectangular (more rows than columns), so we cannot invert directly. The whole point of is to convert a tall rectangular matrix into a square positive definite one — provided the columns are independent.
Solved: 0 / 4