LINEAR-ALGEBRA · Unit 27 · Video 2 · Interactive Practice
| Formula | Name | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Similarity relation | and are similar via invertible | |
| Diagonalization | Special similarity to a diagonal | |
| Trace = sum of eigenvalues | Preserved under similarity | |
| Determinant = product of eigenvalues | Preserved under similarity |
Fix ; every invertible gives a different — so which numbers refuse to move?
💡 Trace and determinant are similarity invariants, so the whole characteristic polynomial — and therefore its roots — is frozen for every invertible .
A shear basis sends each eigenvector of to for — does its eigenvalue come along for the ride?
A — eigenlines fixed
B = M⁻¹AM
Question 1
Suppose is a matrix with and . You compute for some invertible of your choosing. What are the eigenvalues of ?
Correct! Since and , the eigenvalues must satisfy and , giving .
Not quite. Remember that eigenvalues are similarity invariants, and they are completely determined (for a matrix) by the trace and determinant.
Solution:
Trace and determinant are invariants of similarity, so has the same trace and determinant as : The two numbers that sum to and multiply to are and . So the eigenvalues of are — regardless of which invertible you choose, and regardless of the specific entries of (as long as its trace and determinant match).
Question 2
True or False: If and are similar matrices, then they have the same eigenvectors.
Correct! Eigenvalues are invariant, but eigenvectors transform: if then .
Not quite. This is a classic trap. Re-examine the derivation: the eigenvector picks up an factor.
Solution:
The statement is false. The proof in the video shows that if , then So the eigenvalue is preserved, but the eigenvector becomes , not .
This makes geometric sense: a similarity transformation is a change of basis, so the same physical direction has different coordinates in the new basis.
Question 3
Let and , so .
What is ?
Correct! . It looks nothing like , yet shares its eigenvalues and — similarity changes a matrix's appearance, never its spectrum.
Not quite. That is the diagonal cousin , which equals for the eigenvector matrix . Here is a different (non-eigenvector) shear, so won't be diagonal.
Not quite. Carefully compute first, then left-multiply by .
Solution:
Compute right-to-left.
Step 1: .
Step 2: .
Check invariants: . . Eigenvalues are again and .
Question 4
Which statement best captures why similar matrices are considered descriptions of the "same" underlying linear transformation?
Correct! is the change-of-basis formula. is the translator between two coordinate systems for the same underlying transformation.
Not quite. Similar matrices can have completely different entries (as Visualization 1 shows) and different eigenvectors (as Question 2 established). The deeper reason lies in the geometry of basis changes.
Solution:
The relation is precisely the change-of-basis formula. If describes a linear transformation in one basis, then describes the same transformation in a basis related to the original by .
That is why eigenvalues — the actual stretching factors — are invariant: they belong to the transformation, not to any particular description of it. Entries, in contrast, can change dramatically (as the sliders in Visualization 1 demonstrate). Eigenvectors also change, because directions get re-expressed in the new coordinates.
Solved: 0 / 4