LINEAR-ALGEBRA · Unit 27 · Video 2 · Interactive Practice

The Hidden Family: Why Infinitely Many Matrices Share the Same Eigenvalues

IKey Formulas

Formula Name Meaning
B=M1AMB = M^{-1} A M Similarity relation AA and BB are similar via invertible MM
A=SΛS1A = S \Lambda S^{-1} Diagonalization Special similarity to a diagonal Λ\Lambda
tr(A)=λ1+λ2\text{tr}(A) = \lambda_1 + \lambda_2 Trace = sum of eigenvalues Preserved under similarity
det(A)=λ1λ2\det(A) = \lambda_1 \lambda_2 Determinant = product of eigenvalues Preserved under similarity

IIVisualization 1 — The Invariant Characteristic Parabola

Fix A=(2112)A = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \end{pmatrix}; every invertible MM gives a different B=M1AMB = M^{-1}AM — so which numbers refuse to move?

💡 Trace and determinant are similarity invariants, so the whole characteristic polynomial λ24λ+3=(λ1)(λ3)\lambda^2 - 4\lambda + 3 = (\lambda-1)(\lambda-3) — and therefore its roots — is frozen for every invertible MM.

IIIVisualization 2 — Eigenvalues Stay, Eigenlines Move

A shear basis sends each eigenvector xx of AA to M1xM^{-1}x for BB — does its eigenvalue come along for the ride?

A — eigenlines fixed

B = M⁻¹AM

IVQuiz

Question 1

Suppose AA is a 2×22 \times 2 matrix with tr(A)=7\text{tr}(A) = 7 and det(A)=10\det(A) = 10. You compute B=M1AMB = M^{-1} A M for some invertible MM of your choosing. What are the eigenvalues of BB?

Correct! Since tr(B)=7\text{tr}(B) = 7 and det(B)=10\det(B) = 10, the eigenvalues must satisfy λ1+λ2=7\lambda_1 + \lambda_2 = 7 and λ1λ2=10\lambda_1 \lambda_2 = 10, giving {2,5}\{2, 5\}.

Not quite. Remember that eigenvalues are similarity invariants, and they are completely determined (for a 2×22 \times 2 matrix) by the trace and determinant.

Show solution

Solution:

Trace and determinant are invariants of similarity, so BB has the same trace and determinant as AA: λ1+λ2=7,λ1λ2=10.\lambda_1 + \lambda_2 = 7, \qquad \lambda_1 \lambda_2 = 10. The two numbers that sum to 77 and multiply to 1010 are 22 and 55. So the eigenvalues of BB are {2,5}\{2, 5\}regardless of which invertible MM you choose, and regardless of the specific entries of AA (as long as its trace and determinant match).

Question 2

True or False: If AA and BB are similar matrices, then they have the same eigenvectors.

Correct! Eigenvalues are invariant, but eigenvectors transform: if Ax=λxAx = \lambda x then B(M1x)=λ(M1x)B(M^{-1}x) = \lambda (M^{-1}x).

Not quite. This is a classic trap. Re-examine the derivation: the eigenvector picks up an M1M^{-1} factor.

Show solution

Solution:

The statement is false. The proof in the video shows that if Ax=λxA x = \lambda x, then B(M1x)=λ(M1x).B (M^{-1} x) = \lambda (M^{-1} x). So the eigenvalue λ\lambda is preserved, but the eigenvector becomes M1xM^{-1} x, not xx.

  • Eigenvalues: identical between similar matrices.
  • Eigenvectors: related by xM1xx \mapsto M^{-1} x — generally different.

This makes geometric sense: a similarity transformation is a change of basis, so the same physical direction has different coordinates in the new basis.

Question 3

Let A=(2112)A = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \end{pmatrix} and M=(1401)M = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, so M1=(1401)M^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -4 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}.

What is B=M1AMB = M^{-1} A M?

Correct! B=M1AM=(21516)B = M^{-1}AM = \begin{pmatrix} -2 & -15 \\ 1 & 6 \end{pmatrix}. It looks nothing like AA, yet shares its eigenvalues 11 and 33 — similarity changes a matrix's appearance, never its spectrum.

Not quite. That is the diagonal cousin Λ\Lambda, which equals S1ASS^{-1}AS for the eigenvector matrix SS. Here MM is a different (non-eigenvector) shear, so BB won't be diagonal.

Not quite. Carefully compute AMAM first, then left-multiply by M1M^{-1}.

Show solution

Solution:

Compute right-to-left.

Step 1: AMAM. AM=(2112)(1401)=(2916).AM = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 4 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 9 \\ 1 & 6 \end{pmatrix}.

Step 2: M1(AM)M^{-1}(AM). M1(AM)=(1401)(2916)=(2492416)=(21516).M^{-1}(AM) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -4 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 9 \\ 1 & 6 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 2 - 4 & 9 - 24 \\ 1 & 6 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} -2 & -15 \\ 1 & 6 \end{pmatrix}.

Check invariants: tr(B)=2+6=4=tr(A)\text{tr}(B) = -2 + 6 = 4 = \text{tr}(A). det(B)=12(15)=3=det(A)\det(B) = -12 - (-15) = 3 = \det(A). Eigenvalues are again 33 and 11.

Question 4

Which statement best captures why similar matrices are considered descriptions of the "same" underlying linear transformation?

Correct! B=M1AMB = M^{-1}AM is the change-of-basis formula. MM is the translator between two coordinate systems for the same underlying transformation.

Not quite. Similar matrices can have completely different entries (as Visualization 1 shows) and different eigenvectors (as Question 2 established). The deeper reason lies in the geometry of basis changes.

Show solution

Solution:

The relation B=M1AMB = M^{-1} A M is precisely the change-of-basis formula. If AA describes a linear transformation in one basis, then BB describes the same transformation in a basis related to the original by MM.

  • The transformation is the geometric reality (a stretching, rotation, shear, etc.).
  • The matrix is just a coordinate description of that reality.
  • MM is the translator between two coordinate systems.

That is why eigenvalues — the actual stretching factors — are invariant: they belong to the transformation, not to any particular description of it. Entries, in contrast, can change dramatically (as the sliders in Visualization 1 demonstrate). Eigenvectors also change, because directions get re-expressed in the new coordinates.

Solved: 0 / 4