LINEAR-ALGEBRA

Two Matrices, Same Eigenvalues, Different Worlds

IKey Formulas & Facts

Concept Formula / Statement
Similarity B=Mβˆ’1AMB = M^{-1} A M for some invertible MM
Scalar matrix is fixed under conjugation Mβˆ’1(Ξ»I)M=Ξ»IM^{-1}(\lambda I) M = \lambda I for every invertible MM
Eigenvector equation (Aβˆ’Ξ»I)x=0(A - \lambda I)\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{0}
Geometric multiplicity dim⁑ker⁑(Aβˆ’Ξ»I)=\dim \ker(A - \lambda I) = number of independent eigenvectors at Ξ»\lambda
Similarity invariant Geometric multiplicity is preserved under similarity

IIVisualization 1 β€” Same Eigenvalue, Different Eigenvectors

Both matrices have eigenvalues 4,44,4 β€” yet 4I4I turns every direction into an eigenvector while the Jordan block turns only one.

πŸ’‘ The number of eigendirections is the geometric multiplicity: 22 for 4I4I, 11 for the Jordan block.

IIIVisualization 2 β€” Conjugation Can't Move 4I

Conjugating by any invertible MM leaves 4I4I exactly where it is, but slides the Jordan block to a different-looking twin.

πŸ’‘ The set of all Mβˆ’1BMM^{-1}BM β€” every twin the right panel can become β€” is exactly Family 2, the defective similarity class.

IVVisualization 3 β€” The Invariant That Splits the Families

Geometric multiplicity β€” the number of independent eigendirections β€” is 22 only for 4I4I, and 11 for every other twin.

VQuiz Questions

Question 1

Consider the matrix A=[4104].A = \begin{bmatrix} 4 & 1 \\ 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix}.

What is the geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue Ξ»=4\lambda = 4 (i.e., the number of linearly independent eigenvectors)?

βœ… Correct! The Jordan block has exactly one eigendirection, (1,0)(1, 0).

❌ Not quite. You may be thinking of the algebraic multiplicity (which is 2). The geometric multiplicity counts independent eigenvectors, and the Jordan block has only one.

❌ Not quite. Solve (Aβˆ’4I)x=0(A - 4I)\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{0} and count the dimension of the solution space.

Show solution

Solution:

We solve (Aβˆ’4I)x=0(A - 4I)\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{0}: Aβˆ’4I=[0100].A - 4I = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.

This forces the second coordinate x2=0x_2 = 0, with x1x_1 free. The kernel is spanned by (1,0)(1, 0) alone β€” a 1-dimensional eigenspace.

So the geometric multiplicity is 1\boxed{1}. (The algebraic multiplicity is 2, since (Ξ»βˆ’4)2(\lambda - 4)^2 is the characteristic polynomial. The mismatch is what makes the matrix defective.)

Question 2

True or False: If two matrices AA and BB have the same trace, the same determinant, and the same eigenvalues, then they must be similar.

βœ… Correct! Eigenvalues alone don't classify matrices up to similarity once eigenvalues repeat. You also need geometric multiplicities.

❌ Not quite. Remember 4I4I and the Jordan block share trace, det, and eigenvalues but are not similar.

Show solution

Solution:

The video's central counterexample shows this is false.

Take A=4I=[4004]A = 4I = \begin{bmatrix} 4 & 0 \\ 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix} and B=[4104]B = \begin{bmatrix} 4 & 1 \\ 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix}.

  • Both have trace =8= 8
  • Both have determinant =16= 16
  • Both have eigenvalues 4,44, 4

But they are not similar:

  • AA has 2 independent eigenvectors (geometric multiplicity 2)
  • BB has only 1 independent eigenvector (geometric multiplicity 1)

Since geometric multiplicity is a similarity invariant, A≁BA \not\sim B.

Question 3

Consider the matrix C=[51βˆ’13].C = \begin{bmatrix} 5 & 1 \\ -1 & 3 \end{bmatrix}.

Which family does CC belong to (within the universe of 2Γ—22 \times 2 matrices with eigenvalues 4,44, 4)?

βœ… Correct! Cβˆ’4IC - 4I has rank 1, so geometric multiplicity is 1 β€” Family 2.

❌ Not quite. Check: tr⁑(C)=8\operatorname{tr}(C) = 8, det⁑(C)=16\det(C) = 16, so eigenvalues are 4,44, 4. Then compute the rank of Cβˆ’4IC - 4I to find the geometric multiplicity.

Show solution

Solution:

Step 1 β€” Verify the eigenvalues:

  • tr⁑(C)=5+3=8\operatorname{tr}(C) = 5 + 3 = 8
  • det⁑(C)=(5)(3)βˆ’(1)(βˆ’1)=15+1=16\det(C) = (5)(3) - (1)(-1) = 15 + 1 = 16
  • Characteristic polynomial: Ξ»2βˆ’8Ξ»+16=(Ξ»βˆ’4)2\lambda^2 - 8\lambda + 16 = (\lambda - 4)^2

So eigenvalues are 4,44, 4. βœ“

Step 2 β€” Compute the geometric multiplicity: Cβˆ’4I=[11βˆ’1βˆ’1].C - 4I = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ -1 & -1 \end{bmatrix}.

This matrix has rank 1 (the second row is βˆ’1-1 times the first), so its kernel is 1-dimensional. Geometric multiplicity = 1.

Step 3 — Decide the family: Since C≠4IC \neq 4I (in fact, CC has only one eigenvector), CC lives in Family 2: it is similar to the Jordan block [4104]\begin{bmatrix} 4 & 1 \\ 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix}.

Question 4

Which of the following is the fundamental reason that 4I4I forms a similarity family all by itself (a singleton)?

βœ… Correct! Commutativity of scalars with everything is exactly what pins 4I4I in place under conjugation.

❌ Not quite. Trace, determinant, and repeated eigenvalues are all shared with the Jordan block, so they can't be what isolates 4I4I. Think about what makes the conjugation Mβˆ’1(4I)MM^{-1}(4I)M collapse.

Show solution

Solution:

The key calculation is: Mβˆ’1(4I)M=4β‹…Mβˆ’1IM=4β‹…Mβˆ’1M=4I.M^{-1}(4I)M = 4 \cdot M^{-1} I M = 4 \cdot M^{-1} M = 4I.

Scalars commute with every matrix, so the 44 slides past Mβˆ’1M^{-1}, the identity drops out, and Mβˆ’1M=IM^{-1}M = I leaves us with 4I4I no matter what MM we picked. That is why 4I4I is stranded by itself.

The other options are red herrings:

  • ❌ Determinant alone doesn't determine the family (the Jordan block also has det 16).
  • ❌ Having repeated eigenvalues doesn't automatically make a matrix a singleton β€” the Jordan block has repeated eigenvalues and lives in a huge family.
  • ❌ Trace 8 is shared by infinitely many similarity classes.

Solved: 0 / 4