LINEAR-ALGEBRA Ā· Interactive Practice | Unit 27 Ā· Video 4

When Diagonalization Fails: Jordan's Universal Blueprint

IKey Formulas & Facts

Concept Statement
Diagonalization Sāˆ’1AS=Ī›S^{-1} A S = \Lambda — requires nn independent eigenvectors
Jordan block Jk(Ī»)J_k(\lambda) kƗkk\times k matrix with Ī»\lambda on diagonal, 11's on superdiagonal
Block / eigenvector count Each Jordan block contributes exactly one eigenvector
Jordan form Every square matrix AA satisfies A=MJMāˆ’1A = M J M^{-1} where JJ is block-diagonal of Jordan blocks
Similarity invariant Two matrices are similar iff their Jordan block sizes match (up to reordering)

IIVisualization 1 — Anatomy of a Jordan Block

Why does a Jordan block have exactly one eigenvector — no matter how large the block kk?

IIIVisualization 2 — The Twin Matrices Puzzle

Two nilpotent 4Ɨ44\times 4 matrices agree on every invariant but one — so why aren't they similar?

IVVisualization 3 — Numerical Instability of the Jordan Form

Nudge the diagonal by ε\varepsilon and the eigenvalues split — the block structure jumps discontinuously.

šŸ’” Because this jump is discontinuous, numerical linear algebra relies on the SVD — the Jordan form lives in exact arithmetic only.

VQuiz: Test Your Understanding

Question 1

Consider a single 5Ɨ55 \times 5 Jordan block J5(Ī»)J_5(\lambda) with eigenvalue Ī»\lambda repeated five times on the diagonal and 11's on the superdiagonal.

How many independent eigenvectors does this block have?

āœ… Correct! Every Jordan block, no matter how large, contributes exactly one independent eigenvector.

āŒ Not quite. The diagonal Ī»\lambda's give algebraic multiplicity 5, but the superdiagonal 11's force most coordinates to zero — only one direction is free.

Show solution

Solution:

Compute J5(Ī»)āˆ’Ī»IJ_5(\lambda) - \lambda I. The diagonal becomes zero, and we are left with a matrix whose only nonzero entries are 11's on the superdiagonal.

Solving (Jāˆ’Ī»I)v=0(J - \lambda I)v = 0 with v=(v1,v2,v3,v4,v5)Tv = (v_1, v_2, v_3, v_4, v_5)^T gives:

v2=0,v3=0,v4=0,v5=0v_2 = 0, \quad v_3 = 0, \quad v_4 = 0, \quad v_5 = 0

Only v1v_1 is free. So the null space is one-dimensional, spanned by e1=(1,0,0,0,0)Te_1 = (1, 0, 0, 0, 0)^T.

Key fact: every Jordan block — regardless of size — contributes exactly one eigenvector.

Question 2

True or False: If two nƗnn \times n matrices have the same eigenvalues (with the same algebraic multiplicities) and the same number of independent eigenvectors, then they must be similar.

āœ… Correct! Block sizes are the missing invariant — the twin matrices in the video show two matrices that agree on eigenvalues and eigenvector count but are still not similar.

āŒ Not quite. Remember the twin matrices: same eigenvalues, same eigenvector count, but different block signatures {2,2}\{2,2\} vs {3,1}\{3,1\} — and therefore not similar.

Show solution

Solution: False.

The "twin matrices" from the video are a direct counterexample. Both are 4Ɨ44 \times 4, both have eigenvalue 00 with multiplicity 4, and both have exactly 2 independent eigenvectors. Yet:

  • Matrix 1 has Jordan signature {2,2}\{2, 2\} (two 2Ɨ2 blocks)
  • Matrix 2 has Jordan signature {3,1}\{3, 1\} (one 3Ɨ3 block + one 1Ɨ1 block)

Two matrices are similar if and only if their Jordan block sizes match (up to reordering). The block-size signature is the complete invariant — eigenvalues and eigenvector counts alone are not enough.

Question 3

A 6Ɨ66 \times 6 matrix AA has all eigenvalues equal to Ī»=7\lambda = 7 and has exactly 3 independent eigenvectors.

Which of the following is a possible Jordan block signature for AA?

āœ… Correct! 3 eigenvectors means 3 blocks, and 4+1+1=64 + 1 + 1 = 6 matches the matrix size.

āŒ Not quite. Recall: (# of independent eigenvectors) = (# of Jordan blocks). With 3 eigenvectors, you need exactly 3 blocks whose sizes sum to 6.

Show solution

Solution:

The number of Jordan blocks equals the number of independent eigenvectors. Since AA has 3 eigenvectors, it must have exactly 3 blocks. The block sizes must sum to 66 (the matrix size).

Check each option:

  • {3,3}\{3, 3\}: 2 blocks, sum = 6. Eigenvector count = 2. āŒ
  • {4,1,1}\{4, 1, 1\}: 3 blocks, sum = 6. Eigenvector count = 3. Correct!
  • {5,1}\{5, 1\}: 2 blocks, sum = 6. Eigenvector count = 2. āŒ
  • {6}\{6\}: 1 block, sum = 6. Eigenvector count = 1. āŒ

Only {4,1,1}\{4, 1, 1\} provides 3 blocks summing to 6 — matching both the eigenvector count and the matrix size.

Question 4

Classical diagonalization Sāˆ’1AS=Ī›S^{-1} A S = \Lambda corresponds to which special case of Jordan form?

āœ… Correct! A 1Ɨ1 Jordan block is just an eigenvalue on the diagonal, so when every block is 1Ɨ1, JJ collapses to the diagonal matrix Ī›\Lambda.

āŒ Not quite. Think about what a 1Ɨ11 \times 1 Jordan block looks like — there's no superdiagonal, just a single eigenvalue. What if every block in JJ were that small?

Show solution

Solution:

A 1Ɨ11 \times 1 Jordan block is just a single eigenvalue on the diagonal — it has no superdiagonal 11's. If every block in JJ is 1Ɨ11 \times 1, then JJ has nothing but eigenvalues on its diagonal and zeros elsewhere. That is precisely a diagonal matrix:

J=Ī›=diag(Ī»1,Ī»2,…,Ī»n)J = \Lambda = \text{diag}(\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n)

This happens exactly when the number of blocks equals nn, which means the number of independent eigenvectors equals nn — the standard diagonalizability condition.

Diagonalization is the special case of Jordan form where every block has size 1Ɨ1.

Solved: 0 / 4