LINEAR-ALGEBRA Ā· Interactive Practice | Unit 27 Ā· Video 4
| Concept | Statement |
|---|---|
| Diagonalization | ā requires independent eigenvectors |
| Jordan block | matrix with on diagonal, 's on superdiagonal |
| Block / eigenvector count | Each Jordan block contributes exactly one eigenvector |
| Jordan form | Every square matrix satisfies where is block-diagonal of Jordan blocks |
| Similarity invariant | Two matrices are similar iff their Jordan block sizes match (up to reordering) |
Why does a Jordan block have exactly one eigenvector ā no matter how large the block ?
Two nilpotent matrices agree on every invariant but one ā so why aren't they similar?
Nudge the diagonal by and the eigenvalues split ā the block structure jumps discontinuously.
š” Because this jump is discontinuous, numerical linear algebra relies on the SVD ā the Jordan form lives in exact arithmetic only.
Question 1
Consider a single Jordan block with eigenvalue repeated five times on the diagonal and 's on the superdiagonal.
How many independent eigenvectors does this block have?
ā Correct! Every Jordan block, no matter how large, contributes exactly one independent eigenvector.
ā Not quite. The diagonal 's give algebraic multiplicity 5, but the superdiagonal 's force most coordinates to zero ā only one direction is free.
Solution:
Compute . The diagonal becomes zero, and we are left with a matrix whose only nonzero entries are 's on the superdiagonal.
Solving with gives:
Only is free. So the null space is one-dimensional, spanned by .
Key fact: every Jordan block ā regardless of size ā contributes exactly one eigenvector.
Question 2
True or False: If two matrices have the same eigenvalues (with the same algebraic multiplicities) and the same number of independent eigenvectors, then they must be similar.
ā Correct! Block sizes are the missing invariant ā the twin matrices in the video show two matrices that agree on eigenvalues and eigenvector count but are still not similar.
ā Not quite. Remember the twin matrices: same eigenvalues, same eigenvector count, but different block signatures vs ā and therefore not similar.
Solution: False.
The "twin matrices" from the video are a direct counterexample. Both are , both have eigenvalue with multiplicity 4, and both have exactly 2 independent eigenvectors. Yet:
Two matrices are similar if and only if their Jordan block sizes match (up to reordering). The block-size signature is the complete invariant ā eigenvalues and eigenvector counts alone are not enough.
Question 3
A matrix has all eigenvalues equal to and has exactly 3 independent eigenvectors.
Which of the following is a possible Jordan block signature for ?
ā Correct! 3 eigenvectors means 3 blocks, and matches the matrix size.
ā Not quite. Recall: (# of independent eigenvectors) = (# of Jordan blocks). With 3 eigenvectors, you need exactly 3 blocks whose sizes sum to 6.
Solution:
The number of Jordan blocks equals the number of independent eigenvectors. Since has 3 eigenvectors, it must have exactly 3 blocks. The block sizes must sum to (the matrix size).
Check each option:
Only provides 3 blocks summing to 6 ā matching both the eigenvector count and the matrix size.
Question 4
Classical diagonalization corresponds to which special case of Jordan form?
ā Correct! A 1Ć1 Jordan block is just an eigenvalue on the diagonal, so when every block is 1Ć1, collapses to the diagonal matrix .
ā Not quite. Think about what a Jordan block looks like ā there's no superdiagonal, just a single eigenvalue. What if every block in were that small?
Solution:
A Jordan block is just a single eigenvalue on the diagonal ā it has no superdiagonal 's. If every block in is , then has nothing but eigenvalues on its diagonal and zeros elsewhere. That is precisely a diagonal matrix:
This happens exactly when the number of blocks equals , which means the number of independent eigenvectors equals ā the standard diagonalizability condition.
Diagonalization is the special case of Jordan form where every block has size 1Ć1.
Solved: 0 / 4