Mathematical-Reasoning Β· Unit 1 Β· Video 3 Β· Interactive Practice

Conditional Statements and the Truth Table for P β†’ Q

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameMeaning
Pβ†’QP \to QConditional statementRead β€œif PP, then QQ”; PP is the hypothesis, QQ the conclusion
PP true, QQ false β€…β€Šβ‡’β€…β€Š\;\Rightarrow\; Pβ†’QP \to Q falseThe only false rowAn example of this kind is a counterexample
PP false β€…β€Šβ‡’β€…β€Š\;\Rightarrow\; Pβ†’QP \to Q trueRows three and fourA false hypothesis can never make the conditional false

Key Insight: Down the P→QP \to Q column the truth table reads T, F, T, T. An example with a true hypothesis and a true conclusion supports a conditional without proving it; one counterexample proves it false.

IIVisualization 1 β€” Four Cases, One Lie

Each weather-and-Daisy situation is one row of the truth table, and only one row makes the promise a lie.

IIIVisualization 2 β€” Which Row Does an Example Land In?

For β€œif xx is positive, then x2+8xx^2 + 8x is positive,” every value of xx lands in exactly one row.

πŸ’‘ No value of xx lands in row two, yet the examples alone prove nothing; the proof is that for x>0x > 0 both x2x^2 and 8x8x are positive, so their sum is too.

IVVisualization 3 β€” Forty Primes, Then a Counterexample

Forty true cases of β€œn2βˆ’n+41n^2 - n + 41 is prime” prove nothing; one false case disproves the conditional.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 Β· Reading the Truth Table

Given: the conditional β€œIf 3>53 > 5, then 77 is even.” β€” find its truth value.

βœ… Correct! The hypothesis 3>53 > 5 is false, so this is row four of the truth table, where Pβ†’QP \to Q is true.
❌ Not quite. A false conclusion makes Pβ†’QP \to Q false only when the hypothesis is true (row two). Here 3>53 > 5 is false.
❌ Not quite. PP false and QQ false is row four, and the last column of that row is T, not F.
❌ Not quite. PP and QQ are statements, so Pβ†’QP \to Q has its own truth value in every one of the four cases, including those with a false hypothesis.
Show solution

Let PP be β€œ3>53 > 5” and QQ be β€œ77 is even.” Both are false.

A conditional is false only when PP is true and QQ is false. That is not the case here: the hypothesis is false, so we are in row four (PP false, QQ false), where P→QP \to Q is true. The conditional makes no claim about what happens when 3>53 > 5 is false, so nothing it said is contradicted.

Problem 2 Β· Spotting the Counterexample

Given: β€œIf xx is a real number with x>2x > 2, then x2>9x^2 > 9.” β€” find the value of xx that is a counterexample.

βœ… Correct! 52>2\tfrac{5}{2} > 2 makes the hypothesis true, but (52)2=254=6.25\left(\tfrac{5}{2}\right)^2 = \tfrac{25}{4} = 6.25 is not greater than 99: row two.
❌ Not quite. This value is not greater than 22, so the hypothesis is false. An example with a false hypothesis sits in row three or four and can never make the conditional false.
❌ Not quite. 5>25 > 2 and 52=25>95^2 = 25 > 9: hypothesis true, conclusion true. That is row one, which supports the conditional rather than disproving it.
Show solution

A counterexample needs a true hypothesis and a false conclusion.

  • x=1x = 1 and x=βˆ’4x = -4: x>2x > 2 is false, so the hypothesis fails; these cannot be counterexamples (even though (βˆ’4)2=16>9(-4)^2 = 16 > 9).
  • x=5x = 5: 5>25 > 2 and 25>925 > 9, so both parts are true (row one).
  • x=52x = \tfrac{5}{2}: 52>2\tfrac{5}{2} > 2 is true, while 254>9\tfrac{25}{4} > 9 is false (row two).

So x=52x = \tfrac{5}{2} is a counterexample, and this single example proves the conditional false.

Problem 3 Β· Placing Examples on the Table

Given: the video’s conditional β€œIf xx is a positive real number, then x2+8xx^2 + 8x is a positive real number.” β€” find the truth-table row each example occupies.

Which row does x=βˆ’10x = -10 occupy?

Which row does x=βˆ’8x = -8 occupy?

βœ… Correct! Both examples have a false hypothesis, so neither can make the conditional false, whatever the value of x2+8xx^2 + 8x.
❌ Not quite. A negative xx is not a positive real number, so the hypothesis is false. Rows one and two need a true hypothesis.
❌ Not quite. (βˆ’8)2+8(βˆ’8)=64βˆ’64=0(-8)^2 + 8(-8) = 64 - 64 = 0, and 00 is not positive, so the conclusion is false too.
❌ Not quite. Compute (βˆ’10)2+8(βˆ’10)(-10)^2 + 8(-10) and check its sign; βˆ’10-10 itself is not positive.
❌ Not quite. PP is false, but (βˆ’10)2+8(βˆ’10)=100βˆ’80=20>0(-10)^2 + 8(-10) = 100 - 80 = 20 > 0, so QQ is true: that is row three, not row four.
❌ Not quite. βˆ’8-8 is not positive; now compute (βˆ’8)2+8(βˆ’8)(-8)^2 + 8(-8) and decide whether it is positive.
Show solution

Let PP be β€œxx is a positive real number” and QQ be β€œx2+8xx^2 + 8x is a positive real number.”

x=βˆ’10x = -10: PP is false. (βˆ’10)2+8(βˆ’10)=100βˆ’80=20>0(-10)^2 + 8(-10) = 100 - 80 = 20 > 0, so QQ is true. Row three: Pβ†’QP \to Q is true.

x=βˆ’8x = -8: PP is false. (βˆ’8)2+8(βˆ’8)=64βˆ’64=0(-8)^2 + 8(-8) = 64 - 64 = 0, which is not positive, so QQ is false. Row four: Pβ†’QP \to Q is true.

With a false hypothesis the conditional is true whatever the conclusion, so neither example tells us anything against it.

Problem 4 Β· A Prime-Generating Polynomial

Given: β€œIf nn is a positive integer, then n2+n+17n^2 + n + 17 is a prime number.” β€” find the choice that settles whether it is true.

βœ… Correct! 162+16+17=289=17Γ—1716^2 + 16 + 17 = 289 = 17 \times 17 is not prime, and 1616 is a positive integer: a counterexample, so the conditional is false.
❌ Not quite. 152+15+17=25715^2 + 15 + 17 = 257, which is prime. A true hypothesis with a true conclusion supports the conditional but settles nothing.
❌ Not quite. 00 is not a positive integer, so the hypothesis is false, and a false hypothesis can never disprove a conditional (besides, 1717 is prime).
❌ Not quite. Fifteen cases in a row are evidence, not proof, just as forty cases of n2βˆ’n+41n^2 - n + 41 were. Keep going to n=16n = 16.
Show solution

For n=1,2,…,15n = 1, 2, \dots, 15 the values are 1919, 2323, 2929, 3737, 4747, 5959, 7373, 8989, 107107, 127127, 149149, 173173, 199199, 227227, 257257, all prime. That supports the conditional but cannot prove it.

At n=16n = 16 the hypothesis is true, and

162+16+17=16(16+1)+17=16β‹…17+17=17β‹…17=289,16^2 + 16 + 17 = 16(16 + 1) + 17 = 16 \cdot 17 + 17 = 17 \cdot 17 = 289,

which has the factor 1717 other than 11 and itself, so it is not prime. Hypothesis true, conclusion false: row two. So n=16n = 16 is a counterexample and the conditional is false. (This mirrors 412βˆ’41+41=41β‹…4141^2 - 41 + 41 = 41 \cdot 41 in the video.)

Solved: 0 / 4