Mathematical-Reasoning ยท Unit 1 ยท Video 4 ยท Interactive Practice
Using Conditional Statements: Counterexamples, Theorems and Closure Properties
IKey Formulas
Tool
Statement
Note
The one false case
PโQ is false only when P is true and Q is false
All three other rows are true
Disproving PโQ
One case with P true and Q false
A single counterexample suffices
Using a true theorem PโQ
P true โQ true; ย Q false โP false
P false or Q true: no conclusion
Closure of Q
baโโ dcโ=bdacโ,baโยฑdcโ=bdadยฑbcโ
a,b,c,dโZ, b๎ =0, d๎ =0
Key Insight: One example can disprove a conditional, but no number of examples can prove one: showing a set is closed needs an argument that covers every case.
IIUsing a Theorem โ Which Facts Give a Conclusion?
Given only โif f is differentiable at a, then f is continuous at aโ, which known facts force a conclusion?
Theorem gives
IIICounterexamples to Closure
A closure property is a conditional, so one pair with a true hypothesis and a false conclusion disproves it.
๐ก Challenge: find a counterexample showing Z is not closed under division, then hunt for one against Z under multiplication. None exists for multiplication, and no amount of searching can establish that; only an argument like the one below can.
IVProving Q Is Closed
One general argument covers every pair of rationals; any particular pair is just one instance of it.
acโZ and bdโZ, because Z is closed under multiplication.
ad,bc,bdโZ (closure under ร), so ad+bcโZ (closure under +).
ad,bc,bdโZ (closure under ร), so adโbcโZ (closure under โ).
Step 4 ยท Nonzero denominator
b๎ =0 and d๎ =0โbd๎ =0, so bdacโ is a quotient of integers with nonzero denominator: bdacโโQ.
b๎ =0 and d๎ =0โbd๎ =0, so bdad+bcโโQ.
b๎ =0 and d๎ =0โbd๎ =0, so bdadโbcโโQ.
VQuiz Questions
Problem 1 ยท The One False Case
Given: Ed has exactly $35 in his wallet. Which conditional is false?
โ Correct! The hypothesis is true (he has exactly $35) and the conclusion is false (35 is less than 40): the one row where a conditional is false.
โ Not quite. Ed does not have $70, so the hypothesis is false, and a conditional with a false hypothesis is true whatever the conclusion.
โ Not quite. Both parts are true here (35 is at least 30), so the conditional is true.
Show solution
Evaluate hypothesis P and conclusion Q for each statement, knowing Ed holds exactly $35:
(a) P true, Q true (35 โฅ 30): true.
(b) P false, Q false (35 < 60): true.
(c) P true, Q false (35 < 40): false.
(d) P false, Q true (35 โฅ 20): true.
Only (c) lands in the row P true, Q false, so it is the false conditional.
Problem 2 ยท The Theorem Runs One Way
Given: the theorem โif f is differentiable at a, then f is continuous at aโ, and the fact that a function g is continuous at 3. Using only this theorem, what can you conclude?
โ Correct! A true conclusion fits both row 1 (P true) and row 3 (P false), so the hypothesis could go either way.
โ Close, but that runs the theorem backwards.f(x)=โฃxโฃ is continuous at 0 but not differentiable there: continuity does not give differentiability.
โ Not quite.f(x)=sinx is continuous at 0 and differentiable there, so continuity cannot rule differentiability out either.
โ Not quite. The theorem is true for every function; for g it simply lands in a row that gives no information.
Show solution
Let P: โg is differentiable at 3โ and Q: โg is continuous at 3โ. We know Q is true and PโQ is true.
The rows of the truth table with Q true are P true, Q true (conditional true) and P false, Q true (conditional true). Both are consistent with the theorem, so P may be true or false.
Examples confirm both are possible: sinx at 0 (differentiable) and โฃxโฃ at 0 (not differentiable). The theorem gives no conclusion.
Problem 3 ยท Choosing a Valid Counterexample
Given: two closure claims, each a conditional. Pick the pair that is a genuine counterexample to each.
If x and y are irrational, then xโ y is irrational.
If x,yโN, then xรทyโN.
โ Correct!2โ is irrational but 2โโ 2โ=2 is rational, and 1,2โN but 21โโ/N: each has a true hypothesis and a false conclusion.
โ Not a counterexample. The product here is irrational, so the conclusion is true; a counterexample needs the conclusion to fail.
โ Not a counterexample.2 and 3 are rational, so the hypothesis is false and the pair says nothing about the claim.
โ Not quite. Look for two irrationals whose product is rational.
โ Not a counterexample.2โN, so the conclusion is true for this pair.
โ Not a counterexample. One of the inputs is not a natural number (โ4โ/N, 0โ/N), so the hypothesis is false.
โ Not quite. Both inputs must be natural numbers and the quotient must not be.
Show solution
A counterexample to PโQ must make P true andQ false.
Irrationals under ร: take x=y=2โ. Both are irrational (hypothesis true), and 2โโ 2โ=2=12โ is rational (conclusion false). The products ฯ2 and 6โ are irrational, and 2,3 fail the hypothesis.
N under รท: take x=1, y=2. Both are natural numbers, and 1รท2=21โ is not. The pair 6,3 gives 2โN; the pairs with โ4 or 0 fail the hypothesis, since in this course 0โ/N.
Problem 4 ยท Proving a Closure Property
Call an integer even when it equals 2k for some integer k. Which argument proves that the set of even integers is closed under addition?
โ Correct! Arbitrary even x and y are handled at once, and the sum is shown to be twice an integer.
โ Not quite. Examples can support a guess but never cover every pair; closure needs a general argument.
โ Close, butโฆ this shows x+y is an integer, not that it is even; the conclusion must be x+y=2k for some integer k.
โ Not quite. Using one m for both forces x=y, so only pairs of equal numbers are covered.
Show solution
The claim is the conditional: if x and y are even integers, then x+y is an even integer.
Assume the hypothesis: x=2m, y=2n for some integers m,n (separate letters, since x and y are arbitrary). Then
x+y=2m+2n=2(m+n).
Since Z is closed under addition, m+nโZ, so x+y is 2 times an integer: it is even. The argument works for every pair, exactly as the a,b,c,d argument did for Q.