Mathematical-Reasoning ยท Unit 1 ยท Video 4 ยท Interactive Practice

Using Conditional Statements: Counterexamples, Theorems and Closure Properties

IKey Formulas

ToolStatementNote
The one false casePโ†’QP \to Q is false only when PP is true and QQ is falseAll three other rows are true
Disproving Pโ†’QP \to QOne case with PP true and QQ falseA single counterexample suffices
Using a true theorem Pโ†’QP \to QPP true โ‡’\Rightarrow QQ true; ย Q\ Q false โ‡’\Rightarrow PP falsePP false or QQ true: no conclusion
Closure of Q\mathbb{Q}abโ‹…cd=acbd,abยฑcd=adยฑbcbd\frac{a}{b}\cdot\frac{c}{d} = \frac{ac}{bd}, \quad \frac{a}{b} \pm \frac{c}{d} = \frac{ad \pm bc}{bd}a,b,c,dโˆˆZa, b, c, d \in \mathbb{Z}, bโ‰ 0b \neq 0, dโ‰ 0d \neq 0

Key Insight: One example can disprove a conditional, but no number of examples can prove one: showing a set is closed needs an argument that covers every case.

IIUsing a Theorem โ€” Which Facts Give a Conclusion?

Given only โ€œif ff is differentiable at aa, then ff is continuous at aaโ€, which known facts force a conclusion?

Theorem gives

IIICounterexamples to Closure

A closure property is a conditional, so one pair with a true hypothesis and a false conclusion disproves it.

๐Ÿ’ก Challenge: find a counterexample showing Z\mathbb{Z} is not closed under division, then hunt for one against Z\mathbb{Z} under multiplication. None exists for multiplication, and no amount of searching can establish that; only an argument like the one below can.

IVProving Q\mathbb{Q} Is Closed

One general argument covers every pair of rationals; any particular pair is just one instance of it.

Step 1 ยท Givens โ€” ab,cdโˆˆQ\frac{a}{b}, \frac{c}{d} \in \mathbb{Q} with a,b,c,dโˆˆZa, b, c, d \in \mathbb{Z}, bโ‰ 0b \neq 0, dโ‰ 0d \neq 0

Step 2 ยท Combine the fractions

abโ‹…cd=acbd\frac{a}{b}\cdot\frac{c}{d} = \frac{ac}{bd}

Step 3 ยท Numerator and denominator are integers

acโˆˆZac \in \mathbb{Z} and bdโˆˆZbd \in \mathbb{Z}, because Z\mathbb{Z} is closed under multiplication.

Step 4 ยท Nonzero denominator

bโ‰ 0b \neq 0 and dโ‰ 0โ‡’bdโ‰ 0d \neq 0 \Rightarrow bd \neq 0, so acbd\frac{ac}{bd} is a quotient of integers with nonzero denominator: acbdโˆˆQ\frac{ac}{bd} \in \mathbb{Q}.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 ยท The One False Case

Given: Ed has exactly $35 in his wallet. Which conditional is false?

โœ… Correct! The hypothesis is true (he has exactly $35) and the conclusion is false (35 is less than 40): the one row where a conditional is false.
โŒ Not quite. Ed does not have $70, so the hypothesis is false, and a conditional with a false hypothesis is true whatever the conclusion.
โŒ Not quite. Both parts are true here (35 is at least 30), so the conditional is true.
Show solution

Evaluate hypothesis PP and conclusion QQ for each statement, knowing Ed holds exactly $35:

  • (a) PP true, QQ true (35 โ‰ฅ 30): true.
  • (b) PP false, QQ false (35 < 60): true.
  • (c) PP true, QQ false (35 < 40): false.
  • (d) PP false, QQ true (35 โ‰ฅ 20): true.

Only (c) lands in the row PP true, QQ false, so it is the false conditional.

Problem 2 ยท The Theorem Runs One Way

Given: the theorem โ€œif ff is differentiable at aa, then ff is continuous at aaโ€, and the fact that a function gg is continuous at 33. Using only this theorem, what can you conclude?

โœ… Correct! A true conclusion fits both row 1 (PP true) and row 3 (PP false), so the hypothesis could go either way.
โŒ Close, but that runs the theorem backwards. f(x)=โˆฃxโˆฃf(x) = |x| is continuous at 00 but not differentiable there: continuity does not give differentiability.
โŒ Not quite. f(x)=sinโกxf(x) = \sin x is continuous at 00 and differentiable there, so continuity cannot rule differentiability out either.
โŒ Not quite. The theorem is true for every function; for gg it simply lands in a row that gives no information.
Show solution

Let PP: โ€œgg is differentiable at 33โ€ and QQ: โ€œgg is continuous at 33โ€. We know QQ is true and Pโ†’QP \to Q is true.

The rows of the truth table with QQ true are PP true, QQ true (conditional true) and PP false, QQ true (conditional true). Both are consistent with the theorem, so PP may be true or false.

Examples confirm both are possible: sinโกx\sin x at 00 (differentiable) and โˆฃxโˆฃ|x| at 00 (not differentiable). The theorem gives no conclusion.

Problem 3 ยท Choosing a Valid Counterexample

Given: two closure claims, each a conditional. Pick the pair that is a genuine counterexample to each.

If xx and yy are irrational, then xโ‹…yx \cdot y is irrational.

If x,yโˆˆNx, y \in \mathbb{N}, then xรทyโˆˆNx \div y \in \mathbb{N}.

โœ… Correct! 2\sqrt{2} is irrational but 2โ‹…2=2\sqrt{2}\cdot\sqrt{2} = 2 is rational, and 1,2โˆˆN1, 2 \in \mathbb{N} but 12โˆ‰N\tfrac{1}{2} \notin \mathbb{N}: each has a true hypothesis and a false conclusion.
โŒ Not a counterexample. The product here is irrational, so the conclusion is true; a counterexample needs the conclusion to fail.
โŒ Not a counterexample. 22 and 33 are rational, so the hypothesis is false and the pair says nothing about the claim.
โŒ Not quite. Look for two irrationals whose product is rational.
โŒ Not a counterexample. 2โˆˆN2 \in \mathbb{N}, so the conclusion is true for this pair.
โŒ Not a counterexample. One of the inputs is not a natural number (โˆ’4โˆ‰N-4 \notin \mathbb{N}, 0โˆ‰N0 \notin \mathbb{N}), so the hypothesis is false.
โŒ Not quite. Both inputs must be natural numbers and the quotient must not be.
Show solution

A counterexample to Pโ†’QP \to Q must make PP true and QQ false.

Irrationals under ร—\times: take x=y=2x = y = \sqrt{2}. Both are irrational (hypothesis true), and 2โ‹…2=2=21\sqrt{2}\cdot\sqrt{2} = 2 = \tfrac{2}{1} is rational (conclusion false). The products ฯ€2\pi^2 and 6\sqrt{6} are irrational, and 2,32, 3 fail the hypothesis.

N\mathbb{N} under รท\div: take x=1x = 1, y=2y = 2. Both are natural numbers, and 1รท2=121 \div 2 = \tfrac{1}{2} is not. The pair 6,36, 3 gives 2โˆˆN2 \in \mathbb{N}; the pairs with โˆ’4-4 or 00 fail the hypothesis, since in this course 0โˆ‰N0 \notin \mathbb{N}.

Problem 4 ยท Proving a Closure Property

Call an integer even when it equals 2k2k for some integer kk. Which argument proves that the set of even integers is closed under addition?

โœ… Correct! Arbitrary even xx and yy are handled at once, and the sum is shown to be twice an integer.
โŒ Not quite. Examples can support a guess but never cover every pair; closure needs a general argument.
โŒ Close, butโ€ฆ this shows x+yx + y is an integer, not that it is even; the conclusion must be x+y=2kx + y = 2k for some integer kk.
โŒ Not quite. Using one mm for both forces x=yx = y, so only pairs of equal numbers are covered.
Show solution

The claim is the conditional: if xx and yy are even integers, then x+yx + y is an even integer.

Assume the hypothesis: x=2mx = 2m, y=2ny = 2n for some integers m,nm, n (separate letters, since xx and yy are arbitrary). Then

x+y=2m+2n=2(m+n).x + y = 2m + 2n = 2(m + n).

Since Z\mathbb{Z} is closed under addition, m+nโˆˆZm + n \in \mathbb{Z}, so x+yx + y is 22 times an integer: it is even. The argument works for every pair, exactly as the a,b,c,da, b, c, d argument did for Q\mathbb{Q}.

Solved: 0 / 4