Mathematical-Reasoning · Unit 10 · Video 5 · Interactive Practice
Congruence Is Reflexive, Symmetric and Transitive
IKey Formulas
Property
Statement
Why it holds
Definition
a≡b(modn)
n∣(a−b), so a−b=nk for some k∈Z
Reflexive
a≡a(modn)
a−a=0=n⋅0
Symmetric
If a≡b(modn), then b≡a(modn)
a−b=nk⇒b−a=n(−k)
Transitive
If a≡b and b≡c(modn), then a≡c(modn)
a−c=(a−b)+(b−c)=n(k+q)
Key Insight: Congruent numbers need not be equal (23≡8(mod5)), so equality's three properties must each be proved from the definition. Each proof exhibits the integer multiplier: 0, then −k, then k+q.
IIReflexive and Symmetric — Reversing the Difference
Swapping a and b negates the difference, so the multiplier k becomes −k, still an integer.
💡 The reflexive case is legitimate: n∣0 because 0=n⋅0. What is undefined is division by zero, which the proof never uses.
IIITransitive — Two Differences Add Up
Because a−c=(a−b)+(b−c), the multipliers add: a−c=n(k+q).
💡 Challenge: find values with a≡c(modn) even though a≡b(modn). The theorem does not forbid this; it only says nothing when its hypothesis fails.
IVPlanning the Transitive Proof with a Know-Show Table
The table fills backward from the goal Q and forward from the hypothesis P until the rows meet.
Step
Know
Reason
P
a≡b(modn) and b≡c(modn)
Hypothesis
P1
n∣(a−b) and n∣(b−c)
Definition of congruence
P2
a−b=nk and b−c=nq, with k,q∈Z
Definition of divides
P3
(a−b)+(b−c)=nk+nq
Add the equations in P2
⋮
⋮
⋮
Q1
a−c=n⋅(some integer)a−c=n(k+q)
?Simplify and factor P3
Q
a≡c(modn)
?Definition of congruenceDefinitions of divides and congruence; k+q∈Z
Step
Show
Reason
💡 The written proof presents the finished rows as one paragraph in forward order: P, P1, P2, P3, Q1, Q.
VQuiz Questions
Problem 1 · Reversing a Congruence
Given:41≡6(mod7) because 41−6=35=7⋅5. Which line is the step that, as in the symmetric-property proof, shows 6≡41(mod7)?
✅ Correct! Reversing the order negates the difference, and the multiplier −5 is still an integer.
❌ Check the sign.6−41=−35, but 7⋅5=35; the multiplier must change sign along with the difference.
❌ Not quite.41−6=35, not −35. To show 6≡41(mod7) you need the difference 6−41 in that order.
❌ Not quite. A negative number can be a multiple of 7: −35=7⋅(−5) with −5∈Z, so 7∣−35.
Show solution
By definition, 6≡41(mod7) means 7∣(6−41). Multiply 41−6=7⋅5 by −1:
6−41=−(41−6)=−(7⋅5)=7⋅(−5).
Since −5 is an integer, 7∣(6−41), so 6≡41(mod7). This is the symmetric proof with n=7 and k=5.
Problem 2 · One Letter Too Few
Given: a proof of the transitive property begins: "Assume a≡b(modn) and b≡c(modn). Then a−b=nk and b−c=nk for some integer k." What is wrong with this start?
✅ Correct! The two congruences are separate facts, so their multipliers get separate letters, such as k and q.
❌ Not quite. With 23≡8 and 8≡3(mod5), the multipliers are 3 and 1; a single k cannot be both.
❌ Not quite. The definition of divides allows any integer multiplier, negative or zero included; the real problem is the repeated letter.
❌ Not quite. Assuming a≡c(modn) would assume the conclusion. A direct proof starts from the hypothesis, as this one does.
Show solution
From n∣(a−b) we get some integer k with a−b=nk, and from n∣(b−c) we get some integer q with b−c=nq. Nothing says k=q. Writing the same letter twice adds the extra assumption a−b=b−c, so the proof would only cover that special case.
For example, 23−8=5⋅3 and 8−3=5⋅1, so k=3 and q=1. The correct proof continues to a−c=n(k+q).
Problem 3 · Following the Transitive Proof
Given:47≡12(mod7) and 12≡−2(mod7). Write 47−12=7k and 12−(−2)=7q. The proof concludes 47−(−2)=7(k+q). What is k+q?
✅ Correct!k=5 and q=2, and 47−(−2)=49=7⋅7.
❌ Not quite.5 is k alone, from 47−12=35. Add q, from 12−(−2)=14.
❌ Check the operation. The proof adds the two equations, so the multipliers add: k+q, not k−q.
❌ Not quite.49 is the difference a−c itself; k+q is the multiplier with 49=7(k+q).
Show solution
From the hypotheses: 47−12=35=7⋅5, so k=5; and 12−(−2)=14=7⋅2, so q=2.
Adding the equations:
(47−12)+(12−(−2))=7⋅5+7⋅2⟹47−(−2)=7(5+2)=7⋅7.
So k+q=7, and indeed 47+2=49=7⋅7. Hence 47≡−2(mod7).
Problem 4 · A Look-Alike That Breaks
Given: for integers a and b, say "a is near b" when ∣a−b∣≤2. Which of the three properties fails for "is near"?
✅ Correct!0 is near 2 and 2 is near 4, but ∣0−4∣=4>2, so 0 is not near 4.
❌ Not quite.∣a−a∣=0≤2, so every integer is near itself.
❌ Not quite.∣b−a∣=∣a−b∣, so if a is near b then b is near a.
❌ Not quite. Try chaining: 0 is near 2 and 2 is near 4. Is 0 near 4?
Show solution
Reflexive holds:∣a−a∣=0≤2.
Symmetric holds:∣b−a∣=∣−(a−b)∣=∣a−b∣.
Transitive fails: one counterexample suffices. Take a=0, b=2, c=4: ∣0−2∣=2≤2 and ∣2−4∣=2≤2, but ∣0−4∣=4>2.
Congruence escapes this because two multiples of n add to a multiple of n, whereas two distances of at most 2 can add to more than 2. That is why each property of congruence had to be proved, not assumed.