Mathematical-Reasoning · Unit 10 · Video 5 · Interactive Practice

Congruence Is Reflexive, Symmetric and Transitive

IKey Formulas

PropertyStatementWhy it holds
Definitiona≡b(modn)a \equiv b \pmod{n}n∣(a−b)n \mid (a - b), so a−b=nka - b = nk for some k∈Zk \in \mathbb{Z}
Reflexivea≡a(modn)a \equiv a \pmod{n}a−a=0=n⋅0a - a = 0 = n \cdot 0
SymmetricIf a≡b(modn)a \equiv b \pmod{n}, then b≡a(modn)b \equiv a \pmod{n}a−b=nk  ⇒  b−a=n(−k)a - b = nk \;\Rightarrow\; b - a = n(-k)
TransitiveIf a≡ba \equiv b and b≡c(modn)b \equiv c \pmod{n}, then a≡c(modn)a \equiv c \pmod{n}a−c=(a−b)+(b−c)=n(k+q)a - c = (a - b) + (b - c) = n(k + q)

Key Insight: Congruent numbers need not be equal (23≡8(mod5)23 \equiv 8 \pmod{5}), so equality's three properties must each be proved from the definition. Each proof exhibits the integer multiplier: 00, then −k-k, then k+qk + q.

IIReflexive and Symmetric — Reversing the Difference

Swapping aa and bb negates the difference, so the multiplier kk becomes −k-k, still an integer.

💡 The reflexive case is legitimate: n∣0n \mid 0 because 0=n⋅00 = n \cdot 0. What is undefined is division by zero, which the proof never uses.

IIITransitive — Two Differences Add Up

Because a−c=(a−b)+(b−c)a - c = (a - b) + (b - c), the multipliers add: a−c=n(k+q)a - c = n(k + q).

💡 Challenge: find values with a≡c(modn)a \equiv c \pmod{n} even though a≢b(modn)a \not\equiv b \pmod{n}. The theorem does not forbid this; it only says nothing when its hypothesis fails.

IVPlanning the Transitive Proof with a Know-Show Table

The table fills backward from the goal QQ and forward from the hypothesis PP until the rows meet.

StepKnowReason
PPa≡b(modn)a \equiv b \pmod{n} and b≡c(modn)b \equiv c \pmod{n}Hypothesis
⋮\vdots⋮\vdots⋮\vdots
StepShowReason

💡 The written proof presents the finished rows as one paragraph in forward order: PP, P1P1, P2P2, P3P3, Q1Q1, QQ.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 · Reversing a Congruence

Given: 41≡6(mod7)41 \equiv 6 \pmod{7} because 41−6=35=7⋅541 - 6 = 35 = 7 \cdot 5. Which line is the step that, as in the symmetric-property proof, shows 6≡41(mod7)6 \equiv 41 \pmod{7}?

✅ Correct! Reversing the order negates the difference, and the multiplier −5-5 is still an integer.
❌ Check the sign. 6−41=−356 - 41 = -35, but 7⋅5=357 \cdot 5 = 35; the multiplier must change sign along with the difference.
❌ Not quite. 41−6=3541 - 6 = 35, not −35-35. To show 6≡41(mod7)6 \equiv 41 \pmod{7} you need the difference 6−416 - 41 in that order.
❌ Not quite. A negative number can be a multiple of 77: −35=7⋅(−5)-35 = 7 \cdot (-5) with −5∈Z-5 \in \mathbb{Z}, so 7∣−357 \mid -35.
Show solution

By definition, 6≡41(mod7)6 \equiv 41 \pmod{7} means 7∣(6−41)7 \mid (6 - 41). Multiply 41−6=7⋅541 - 6 = 7 \cdot 5 by −1-1:

6−41=−(41−6)=−(7⋅5)=7⋅(−5).6 - 41 = -(41 - 6) = -(7 \cdot 5) = 7 \cdot (-5).

Since −5-5 is an integer, 7∣(6−41)7 \mid (6 - 41), so 6≡41(mod7)6 \equiv 41 \pmod{7}. This is the symmetric proof with n=7n = 7 and k=5k = 5.

Problem 2 · One Letter Too Few

Given: a proof of the transitive property begins: "Assume a≡b(modn)a \equiv b \pmod{n} and b≡c(modn)b \equiv c \pmod{n}. Then a−b=nka - b = nk and b−c=nkb - c = nk for some integer kk." What is wrong with this start?

✅ Correct! The two congruences are separate facts, so their multipliers get separate letters, such as kk and qq.
❌ Not quite. With 23≡823 \equiv 8 and 8≡3(mod5)8 \equiv 3 \pmod{5}, the multipliers are 33 and 11; a single kk cannot be both.
❌ Not quite. The definition of divides allows any integer multiplier, negative or zero included; the real problem is the repeated letter.
❌ Not quite. Assuming a≡c(modn)a \equiv c \pmod{n} would assume the conclusion. A direct proof starts from the hypothesis, as this one does.
Show solution

From n∣(a−b)n \mid (a - b) we get some integer kk with a−b=nka - b = nk, and from n∣(b−c)n \mid (b - c) we get some integer qq with b−c=nqb - c = nq. Nothing says k=qk = q. Writing the same letter twice adds the extra assumption a−b=b−ca - b = b - c, so the proof would only cover that special case.

For example, 23−8=5⋅323 - 8 = 5 \cdot 3 and 8−3=5⋅18 - 3 = 5 \cdot 1, so k=3k = 3 and q=1q = 1. The correct proof continues to a−c=n(k+q)a - c = n(k + q).

Problem 3 · Following the Transitive Proof

Given: 47≡12(mod7)47 \equiv 12 \pmod{7} and 12≡−2(mod7)12 \equiv -2 \pmod{7}. Write 47−12=7k47 - 12 = 7k and 12−(−2)=7q12 - (-2) = 7q. The proof concludes 47−(−2)=7(k+q)47 - (-2) = 7(k + q). What is k+qk + q?

✅ Correct! k=5k = 5 and q=2q = 2, and 47−(−2)=49=7⋅747 - (-2) = 49 = 7 \cdot 7.
❌ Not quite. 55 is kk alone, from 47−12=3547 - 12 = 35. Add qq, from 12−(−2)=1412 - (-2) = 14.
❌ Check the operation. The proof adds the two equations, so the multipliers add: k+qk + q, not k−qk - q.
❌ Not quite. 4949 is the difference a−ca - c itself; k+qk + q is the multiplier with 49=7(k+q)49 = 7(k + q).
Show solution

From the hypotheses: 47−12=35=7⋅547 - 12 = 35 = 7 \cdot 5, so k=5k = 5; and 12−(−2)=14=7⋅212 - (-2) = 14 = 7 \cdot 2, so q=2q = 2.

Adding the equations:

(47−12)+(12−(−2))=7⋅5+7⋅2⟹47−(−2)=7(5+2)=7⋅7.(47 - 12) + (12 - (-2)) = 7 \cdot 5 + 7 \cdot 2 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad 47 - (-2) = 7(5 + 2) = 7 \cdot 7.

So k+q=7k + q = 7, and indeed 47+2=49=7⋅747 + 2 = 49 = 7 \cdot 7. Hence 47≡−2(mod7)47 \equiv -2 \pmod{7}.

Problem 4 · A Look-Alike That Breaks

Given: for integers aa and bb, say "aa is near bb" when ∣a−b∣≤2|a - b| \le 2. Which of the three properties fails for "is near"?

✅ Correct! 00 is near 22 and 22 is near 44, but ∣0−4∣=4>2|0 - 4| = 4 > 2, so 00 is not near 44.
❌ Not quite. ∣a−a∣=0≤2|a - a| = 0 \le 2, so every integer is near itself.
❌ Not quite. ∣b−a∣=∣a−b∣|b - a| = |a - b|, so if aa is near bb then bb is near aa.
❌ Not quite. Try chaining: 00 is near 22 and 22 is near 44. Is 00 near 44?
Show solution

Reflexive holds: ∣a−a∣=0≤2|a - a| = 0 \le 2.

Symmetric holds: ∣b−a∣=∣−(a−b)∣=∣a−b∣|b - a| = |-(a - b)| = |a - b|.

Transitive fails: one counterexample suffices. Take a=0a = 0, b=2b = 2, c=4c = 4: ∣0−2∣=2≤2|0 - 2| = 2 \le 2 and ∣2−4∣=2≤2|2 - 4| = 2 \le 2, but ∣0−4∣=4>2|0 - 4| = 4 > 2.

Congruence escapes this because two multiples of nn add to a multiple of nn, whereas two distances of at most 22 can add to more than 22. That is why each property of congruence had to be proved, not assumed.

Solved: 0 / 4