Mathematical-Reasoning · Unit 10 · Video 7 · Interactive Practice

Rule Out Four Cases, Prove Two: Odd Squares Modulo 6

IKey Formulas

StatementRole in the proof
Every integer aa satisfies a≡r(mod6)a \equiv r \pmod 6 for exactly one r∈{0,1,2,3,4,5}r \in \{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}Gives the six cases
6k+2j=2(3k+j)6k + 2j = 2(3k + j) for j=0,1,2j = 0, 1, 2Remainders 00, 22, 44 make aa even: impossible when aa is odd
6k+3=3(2k+1)6k + 3 = 3(2k + 1)Remainder 33 makes 3∣a3 \mid a: impossible when 3∤a3 \nmid a
If a≡b(modn)a \equiv b \pmod n, then am≡bm(modn)a^m \equiv b^m \pmod n; if a≡ba \equiv b and b≡c(modn)b \equiv c \pmod n, then a≡c(modn)a \equiv c \pmod nPower and transitive properties: settle the two surviving cases

Key Insight: If aa is odd and 3∤a3 \nmid a, then a≡1a \equiv 1 or a≡5(mod6)a \equiv 5 \pmod 6, and in both cases a2≡1(mod6)a^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 6, because 12=11^2 = 1 and 52=25=6⋅4+15^2 = 25 = 6 \cdot 4 + 1.

IIRuling Out Cases with the Hypotheses

Each hypothesis removes exactly the remainders it contradicts; together they leave only 11 and 55.

💡 A struck case is not skipped: each one is closed by its own short proof by contradiction, so all six cases are accounted for.

IIISix Columns of Integers

Every integer sits in exactly one remainder column, and that column alone fixes the remainder of a2a^2.

IVCase 2: From 25 Down to 1

In Case 2, a≡5(mod6)a \equiv 5 \pmod 6, the power property only reaches a2≡25a^2 \equiv 25; the definition of congruence and transitivity carry it down to 11.

1 · The case
a≡5(mod6),that is,6∣a−5a \equiv 5 \pmod 6, \quad\text{that is,}\quad 6 \mid a - 5

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 · Closing the Case a≡4a \equiv 4

Given: aa is odd and, in the case being ruled out, a=6k+4a = 6k + 4 for some integer kk. Which line produces the contradiction?

✅ Correct! 2(3k+2)=6k+42(3k + 2) = 6k + 4 and 3k+23k + 2 is an integer, so aa is even, contradicting that aa is odd.
❌ Not quite. Expand it: 2(3k+4)=6k+82(3k + 4) = 6k + 8, not 6k+46k + 4. Half of 6k+46k + 4 is 3k+23k + 2.
❌ True, but no contradiction. 3(2k+1)+1=6k+43(2k + 1) + 1 = 6k + 4 is correct and does show 3∤a3 \nmid a — but an odd integer can perfectly well satisfy 3∤a3 \nmid a, so it contradicts nothing. The contradiction must be with oddness.
❌ Not quite. 32k+1\tfrac{3}{2}k + 1 need not be an integer (for k=1k = 1, a=10a = 10 and 4∤104 \nmid 10), so this line proves nothing. Factor out 22 instead.
Show solution

Suppose, to the contrary, that a≡4(mod6)a \equiv 4 \pmod 6. Then 6∣a−46 \mid a - 4, so a−4=6ka - 4 = 6k for some integer kk, and

a=6k+4=2(3k+2).a = 6k + 4 = 2(3k + 2).

Since 3k+23k + 2 is an integer, aa is even. No integer is both even and odd, which contradicts the assumption that aa is odd. Hence an odd integer is never congruent to 44 modulo 66.

Problem 2 · Not Yet the Claim

Given: In Case 2 (a≡5(mod6)a \equiv 5 \pmod 6), the power property gives a2≡25(mod6)a^2 \equiv 25 \pmod 6. Which statement correctly finishes the case?

✅ Correct! The definition of congruence turns 24=6⋅424 = 6 \cdot 4 into 25≡125 \equiv 1, and transitivity chains a2≡25≡1(mod6)a^2 \equiv 25 \equiv 1 \pmod 6.
❌ Not quite. a2≡25(mod6)a^2 \equiv 25 \pmod 6 does not mean a2=25a^2 = 25. For a=11a = 11, a2=121a^2 = 121; what is true is 121−25=96=6⋅16121 - 25 = 96 = 6 \cdot 16.
❌ Not quite. a2≡25(mod6)a^2 \equiv 25 \pmod 6 means 6∣a2−256 \mid a^2 - 25, not 6∣256 \mid 25. Case 2 does happen: a=5a = 5 is odd, 3∤53 \nmid 5, and 5≡5(mod6)5 \equiv 5 \pmod 6.
❌ Not quite. The power property runs from aa to a2a^2, not backwards — and in this case a≡5a \equiv 5, not 11. What must be reduced is a2a^2, not aa.
Show solution

From a≡5(mod6)a \equiv 5 \pmod 6, the power property gives a2≡52=25(mod6)a^2 \equiv 5^2 = 25 \pmod 6. This is true, but the claim is a2≡1a^2 \equiv 1. Check that

25−1=24=6⋅4,25 - 1 = 24 = 6 \cdot 4,

so 6∣25−16 \mid 25 - 1 and 25≡1(mod6)25 \equiv 1 \pmod 6 by the definition of congruence. Now a2≡25a^2 \equiv 25 and 25≡1(mod6)25 \equiv 1 \pmod 6, so the transitive property gives a2≡1(mod6)a^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 6.

Problem 3 · Drop the Second Hypothesis

Given: aa is an odd integer, with no assumption about divisibility by 33. Find which cases modulo 66 survive, and which remainders a2a^2 can leave on division by 66.

Which cases a≡r(mod6)a \equiv r \pmod 6 survive?

Which remainders can a2a^2 leave on division by 66?

✅ Correct! Oddness removes only 00, 22, 44. Case 33 survives and gives a2≡9≡3a^2 \equiv 9 \equiv 3, so the remainder 11 is no longer guaranteed — exactly the video's example 32=9=6⋅1+33^2 = 9 = 6 \cdot 1 + 3.
❌ Not quite. Removing case 33 needed the hypothesis 3∤a3 \nmid a, which is gone. And 6k+3=2(3k+1)+16k + 3 = 2(3k + 1) + 1 is odd.
❌ Not quite. Case 00 is still removed: a=6k=2(3k)a = 6k = 2(3k) is even. One contradiction is enough.
❌ Backwards. 00, 22, 44 are the cases oddness rules out — they make aa even.
❌ Not quite. That needed 3∤a3 \nmid a. Try a=3a = 3: a2=9=6⋅1+3a^2 = 9 = 6 \cdot 1 + 3.
❌ Not quite. Those are the remainders of aa, not of a2a^2. Square each case: 52=25≡1(mod6)5^2 = 25 \equiv 1 \pmod 6.
❌ Not quite. The remainder 44 comes from a≡2a \equiv 2 or a≡4a \equiv 4, which make aa even and are ruled out.
Show solution

Cases. If a≡0,2,4(mod6)a \equiv 0, 2, 4 \pmod 6, then a=6k+2j=2(3k+j)a = 6k + 2j = 2(3k + j) is even, a contradiction. Nothing removes 11, 33, 55: all three remainders are odd, and without 3∤a3 \nmid a there is no second hypothesis to contradict.

Squares. By the power property:

a≡1⇒a2≡1,a≡3⇒a2≡9≡3,a \equiv 1 \Rightarrow a^2 \equiv 1, \qquad a \equiv 3 \Rightarrow a^2 \equiv 9 \equiv 3, a≡5⇒a2≡25≡1(mod6),a \equiv 5 \Rightarrow a^2 \equiv 25 \equiv 1 \pmod 6,

using 9−3=6=6⋅19 - 3 = 6 = 6 \cdot 1 and 25−1=24=6⋅425 - 1 = 24 = 6 \cdot 4. So a2a^2 leaves remainder 11 or 33, and both occur: 12=11^2 = 1 and 32=9=6⋅1+33^2 = 9 = 6 \cdot 1 + 3.

Problem 4 · The Same Pattern Modulo 8

Prove: if aa is an odd integer, then a2≡1(mod8)a^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 8, by the method of this video: list the cases a≡r(mod8)a \equiv r \pmod 8 with r∈{0,1,…,7}r \in \{0, 1, \dots, 7\}, rule out the ones the hypothesis contradicts, and use congruence arithmetic on the rest.

How many cases survive the ruling-out?

In the case a≡3(mod8)a \equiv 3 \pmod 8, what does the argument conclude?

✅ Correct! Oddness removes the four even remainders, leaving 11, 33, 55, 77, and each square reduces to 11: 11, 9=8+19 = 8 + 1, 25=8⋅3+125 = 8 \cdot 3 + 1, 49=8⋅6+149 = 8 \cdot 6 + 1.
❌ Not quite. Modulo 66, two hypotheses left two cases. Here there is only oddness, and it removes only the even remainders 00, 22, 44, 66.
❌ Not quite. Count the odd remainders between 00 and 77: 11, 33, 55, 77.
❌ Not quite. Eight is the number of cases before ruling out. Each even remainder gives a=8k+2j=2(4k+j)a = 8k + 2j = 2(4k + j), which is even.
❌ Not quite. That is the remainder of aa. The power property squares it: a2≡32=9(mod8)a^2 \equiv 3^2 = 9 \pmod 8.
❌ Not quite. Squaring is not doubling: the power property gives a2≡32=9a^2 \equiv 3^2 = 9, not 2⋅3=62 \cdot 3 = 6.
❌ Not quite. Reduce 99 modulo 88: 9−1=89 - 1 = 8, so 9≡19 \equiv 1, while 9−7=29 - 7 = 2 is not a multiple of 88.
Show solution

Ruling out. If a≡2j(mod8)a \equiv 2j \pmod 8 with j∈{0,1,2,3}j \in \{0, 1, 2, 3\}, then a=8k+2j=2(4k+j)a = 8k + 2j = 2(4k + j) is even, contradicting that aa is odd. That removes 00, 22, 44, 66 and leaves four cases: 11, 33, 55, 77.

The four cases. By the power property and then transitivity:

a≡1⇒a2≡1,a≡3⇒a2≡9≡1(mod8),a \equiv 1 \Rightarrow a^2 \equiv 1, \qquad a \equiv 3 \Rightarrow a^2 \equiv 9 \equiv 1 \pmod 8, a≡5⇒a2≡25≡1,a≡7⇒a2≡49≡1(mod8),a \equiv 5 \Rightarrow a^2 \equiv 25 \equiv 1, \qquad a \equiv 7 \Rightarrow a^2 \equiv 49 \equiv 1 \pmod 8,

because 9−1=8⋅19 - 1 = 8 \cdot 1, 25−1=8⋅325 - 1 = 8 \cdot 3 and 49−1=8⋅649 - 1 = 8 \cdot 6. In every case a2≡1(mod8)a^2 \equiv 1 \pmod 8.

Solved: 0 / 4