Multiply the hypothesis by 5, finish by transitivity
Key Insight:3β£(4n+1) has a provable inductive step but a false basis step, and it is false for every n; n2βn+41 is prime for n=1,β¦,40 yet fails at n=41. Neither step can be skipped.
IIVisualization 1 β Which Step Fails?
Induction needs a true P(1) and a true conditional P(k)βP(k+1) for every kβN.
IIIVisualization 2 β The Know-Show Table for 4β£(5k+1β1)
The forward and backward processes meet once 5k+1=5β 5k links the known equation to the goal.
The divisibility proof and the congruence proof both rest on 5k+1=5β 5k, checked here with numbers.
divides
β‘ (mod 4)
VQuiz Questions
Problem 1 Β· Close the Gap
Given: In the inductive step for P(n):4β£(5nβ1), the hypothesis gives 5k=4m+1 for some integer m. Find the result of substituting this into 5k+1β1=5β 5kβ1.
β Correct!5(4m+1)β1=20m+4=4(5m+1), and 5m+1 is an integer, so 4β£(5k+1β1).
β Not quite. This treats 5k+1 as 5k+5. The rule is 5k+1=5β 5k, so the whole of 4m+1 is multiplied by 5.
β Close, butβ¦ the 5 multiplies both terms of 4m+1: 5(4m+1)=20m+5, and then subtracting 1 gives 20m+4.
β Check the sign. The expression is 5(4m+1)β1, so the constant is 5β1=4, not 5+1.
Because m is an integer, 5m+1 is an integer, so 4β£(5k+1β1). That is P(k+1).
Problem 2 Β· An Inductive Step Without a Basis
Given:P(n):3β£(4n+1), where aβ£b means b=aq for some integer q. The inductive step can be proved: from 4k+1=3m we get 4k+1+1=4(3mβ1)+1=3(4mβ1). Which statement is correct?
β Correct! Every value 4n+1 leaves remainder 2 on division by 3, so no case is true; the inductive step only transfers truth that is never there.
β Not quite. Induction also needs the basis step, and P(1) is false: 41+1=5 and 3β€5.
β Not quite. The algebra is correct: 4(3mβ1)+1=12mβ3=3(4mβ1). A conditional P(k)βP(k+1) whose hypothesis is false is true, so the inductive step can be proved here.
β Check the division.17=3β 5+2, so 3β€17 and P(2) is false too.
Show solution
Inductive step. If 4k+1=3m, then 4k=3mβ1 and
4k+1+1=4β 4k+1=4(3mβ1)+1=12mβ3=3(4mβ1),
so P(k)βP(k+1) holds for every kβN.
Basis step.41+1=5 and 3β€5, so P(1) is false. The next cases are 17 and 65, also not multiples of 3.
Every case.4β‘1(mod3), so 4nβ‘1(mod3) and 4n+1β‘2(mod3). Thus P(n) is false for every nβN: without a true basis step, the inductive step proves nothing.
Problem 3 Β· Forty Cases Are Not a Proof
Given:P(n):n2βn+41 is prime. The cases P(1),P(2),β¦,P(40) are all true.
What is 412β41+41, and is it prime?
Among these values of k, for which is the conditional P(k)βP(k+1) false?
β Correct!P(40) is true and P(41) is false, so (βkβN)(P(k)βP(k+1)) is false and no inductive step can ever be proved.
β Not quite.1601 is the value at n=40: 402β40+41=1601. At n=41 the last two terms cancel.
β Close, butβ¦1681 is the right value, but 412β41+41=412=41β 41, which is not prime.
β Not quite.1763 is the value at n=42: 422β42+41=1763. At n=41 the value is 412.
β Not quite.P(39) is true (1523 is prime) and P(40) is true (1601 is prime), so P(39)βP(40) is true.
β Not quite.P(41) is false, and a conditional with a false hypothesis is true, so P(41)βP(42) is true.
β Not quite.P(42) is false (1763=41β 43), so the conditional P(42)βP(43) has a false hypothesis and is true.
β Not quite. Substitute n=41: 412β41+41=412.
β Not quite. A conditional is false only when its hypothesis is true and its conclusion is false.
Show solution
The value at n=41. The last two terms cancel:
412β41+41=412=1681=41β 41,
so 1681 is not prime and P(41) is false.
The failing conditional.P(k)βP(k+1) is false exactly when P(k) is true and P(k+1) is false.
k=39: P(39) (1523, prime) and P(40) (1601, prime) are both true, so the conditional is true.
k=40: P(40) is true and P(41) is false, so the conditional is false.
k=41 and k=42: P(41) and P(42) are false (1763=41β 43), so both conditionals are true.
Since the inductive step must hold for every k, including k=40, it cannot be proved. Forty true cases are evidence, not a proof.
Problem 4 Β· The Same Proof for 6β£(7nβ1)
Given:P(n):6β£(7nβ1). In the inductive step, assume 7kβ1=6m for some integer m.
Then 7k+1β1=6s for which integer s?
Which congruence states the same proposition? (aβ‘b(modn) means nβ£(aβb).)
β Correct!7k+1β1=7(6m+1)β1=42m+6=6(7m+1), and 6β£(7nβ1) says exactly that 7nβ‘1(mod6).
β Close, butβ¦ the 7 multiplies both terms of 6m+1: 7(6m+1)β1=42m+7β1=42m+6.
β Not quite.6m+1 is 7k, from the hypothesis. The goal needs 7k+1β1=7β 7kβ1 written as 6 times an integer.
β Check the sign.7(6m+1)β1=42m+6=6(7m+1); the factor 4mβ1 in the 3β£(4n+1) example came from a different hypothesis.
β Not quite.7nβ‘0(mod6) means 6β£7n, which is false: 7=6β 1+1.
β Not quite. That means 7β£(7nβ1), which is false because 7β£7n. The modulus must be 6.
β Not quite.7nβ‘β1(mod6) means 6β£(7n+1); already 7+1=8 is not a multiple of 6.
β Not quite. Write 7k+1β1=7β 7kβ1 and substitute 7k=6m+1.
β Not quite.6β£(7nβ1) is the definition of 7nβ‘1(mod6).
Show solution
Inductive step. From 7kβ1=6m we get 7k=6m+1. Since 7k+1=7β 7k,
Congruence form. By definition, 7nβ‘1(mod6) means 6β£(7nβ1), so the proposition is: for every nβN, 7nβ‘1(mod6). The congruence proof mirrors the video's: 7β‘1(mod6) gives P(1), and multiplying 7kβ‘1(mod6) by 7β‘7(mod6) gives 7k+1β‘7(mod6); since 7β‘1(mod6), transitivity gives 7k+1β‘1(mod6).