Mathematical-Reasoning Β· Unit 12 Β· Video 4 Β· Interactive Practice

Why Both Steps Matter: Proving 4 Divides 5ⁿ βˆ’ 1

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameRole here
P(1)∧(βˆ€k∈N) (P(k)β†’P(k+1))P(1) \land (\forall k \in \mathbb{N})\,(P(k) \to P(k+1)) gives (βˆ€n∈N) (P(n))(\forall n \in \mathbb{N})\,(P(n))Principle of Mathematical InductionBasis step and inductive step are both required
5k+1βˆ’1=5β‹…5kβˆ’1=5(4m+1)βˆ’1=4(5m+1)5^{k+1} - 1 = 5 \cdot 5^k - 1 = 5(4m + 1) - 1 = 4(5m + 1)Divisibility proofUses 5k=4m+15^k = 4m + 1 from the hypothesis 5kβˆ’1=4m5^k - 1 = 4m
4∣(5nβˆ’1)β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Š5n≑1(mod4)4 \mid (5^n - 1) \iff 5^n \equiv 1 \pmod 4Same statement as a congruencea≑b(modn)a \equiv b \pmod n means n∣(aβˆ’b)n \mid (a - b)
5β‹…5k≑5β‹…1(mod4)5 \cdot 5^k \equiv 5 \cdot 1 \pmod 4, then 5≑1(mod4)5 \equiv 1 \pmod 4Congruence proofMultiply the hypothesis by 55, finish by transitivity

Key Insight: 3∣(4n+1)3 \mid (4^n + 1) has a provable inductive step but a false basis step, and it is false for every nn; n2βˆ’n+41n^2 - n + 41 is prime for n=1,…,40n = 1, \dots, 40 yet fails at n=41n = 41. Neither step can be skipped.

IIVisualization 1 β€” Which Step Fails?

Induction needs a true P(1)P(1) and a true conditional P(k)β†’P(k+1)P(k) \to P(k+1) for every k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N}.

IIIVisualization 2 β€” The Know-Show Table for 4∣(5k+1βˆ’1)4 \mid (5^{k+1} - 1)

The forward and backward processes meet once 5k+1=5β‹…5k5^{k+1} = 5 \cdot 5^k links the known equation to the goal.

StepKnow / ShowReason
Pk∈Nk \in \mathbb{N} and 4∣(5kβˆ’1)4 \mid (5^k - 1)inductive hypothesis
P1(βˆƒm∈Z) (5kβˆ’1=4m)(\exists m \in \mathbb{Z})\,(5^k - 1 = 4m)definition of divides
P25k=4m+15^k = 4m + 1solve P1 for 5k5^k
link: 5k+1=5β‹…5k5^{k+1} = 5 \cdot 5^k5β‹…5kβˆ’1=5(4m+1)βˆ’1=20m+4=4(5m+1)5 \cdot 5^k - 1 = 5(4m + 1) - 1 = 20m + 4 = 4(5m + 1)
Q25k+1βˆ’1=5β‹…5kβˆ’15^{k+1} - 1 = 5 \cdot 5^k - 15k+1=5β‹…5k5^{k+1} = 5 \cdot 5^k; then substitute P2
Q1(βˆƒs∈Z) (5k+1βˆ’1=4s)(\exists s \in \mathbb{Z})\,(5^{k+1} - 1 = 4s)?show 5β‹…5kβˆ’15 \cdot 5^k - 1 is a multiple of 44
Q4∣(5k+1βˆ’1)4 \mid (5^{k+1} - 1)definition of divides

IVVisualization 3 β€” Two Proofs, One Link

The divisibility proof and the congruence proof both rest on 5k+1=5β‹…5k5^{k+1} = 5 \cdot 5^k, checked here with numbers.

divides

≑ (mod 4)

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 Β· Close the Gap

Given: In the inductive step for P(n) ⁣:4∣(5nβˆ’1)P(n)\colon 4 \mid (5^n - 1), the hypothesis gives 5k=4m+15^k = 4m + 1 for some integer mm. Find the result of substituting this into 5k+1βˆ’1=5β‹…5kβˆ’15^{k+1} - 1 = 5 \cdot 5^k - 1.

βœ… Correct! 5(4m+1)βˆ’1=20m+4=4(5m+1)5(4m + 1) - 1 = 20m + 4 = 4(5m + 1), and 5m+15m + 1 is an integer, so 4∣(5k+1βˆ’1)4 \mid (5^{k+1} - 1).
❌ Not quite. This treats 5k+15^{k+1} as 5k+55^k + 5. The rule is 5k+1=5β‹…5k5^{k+1} = 5 \cdot 5^k, so the whole of 4m+14m + 1 is multiplied by 55.
❌ Close, but… the 55 multiplies both terms of 4m+14m + 1: 5(4m+1)=20m+55(4m + 1) = 20m + 5, and then subtracting 11 gives 20m+420m + 4.
❌ Check the sign. The expression is 5(4m+1)βˆ’15(4m + 1) - 1, so the constant is 5βˆ’1=45 - 1 = 4, not 5+15 + 1.
Show solution

Since 5k+1=5β‹…5k5^{k+1} = 5 \cdot 5^k and 5k=4m+15^k = 4m + 1,

5k+1βˆ’1=5β‹…5kβˆ’1=5(4m+1)βˆ’1=20m+5βˆ’1=20m+4=4(5m+1).5^{k+1} - 1 = 5 \cdot 5^k - 1 = 5(4m + 1) - 1 = 20m + 5 - 1 = 20m + 4 = 4(5m + 1).

Because mm is an integer, 5m+15m + 1 is an integer, so 4∣(5k+1βˆ’1)4 \mid (5^{k+1} - 1). That is P(k+1)P(k+1).

Problem 2 Β· An Inductive Step Without a Basis

Given: P(n) ⁣:3∣(4n+1)P(n)\colon 3 \mid (4^n + 1), where a∣ba \mid b means b=aqb = aq for some integer qq. The inductive step can be proved: from 4k+1=3m4^k + 1 = 3m we get 4k+1+1=4(3mβˆ’1)+1=3(4mβˆ’1)4^{k+1} + 1 = 4(3m - 1) + 1 = 3(4m - 1). Which statement is correct?

βœ… Correct! Every value 4n+14^n + 1 leaves remainder 22 on division by 33, so no case is true; the inductive step only transfers truth that is never there.
❌ Not quite. Induction also needs the basis step, and P(1)P(1) is false: 41+1=54^1 + 1 = 5 and 3∀53 \nmid 5.
❌ Not quite. The algebra is correct: 4(3mβˆ’1)+1=12mβˆ’3=3(4mβˆ’1)4(3m - 1) + 1 = 12m - 3 = 3(4m - 1). A conditional P(k)β†’P(k+1)P(k) \to P(k+1) whose hypothesis is false is true, so the inductive step can be proved here.
❌ Check the division. 17=3β‹…5+217 = 3 \cdot 5 + 2, so 3∀173 \nmid 17 and P(2)P(2) is false too.
Show solution

Inductive step. If 4k+1=3m4^k + 1 = 3m, then 4k=3mβˆ’14^k = 3m - 1 and

4k+1+1=4β‹…4k+1=4(3mβˆ’1)+1=12mβˆ’3=3(4mβˆ’1),4^{k+1} + 1 = 4 \cdot 4^k + 1 = 4(3m - 1) + 1 = 12m - 3 = 3(4m - 1),

so P(k)β†’P(k+1)P(k) \to P(k+1) holds for every k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N}.

Basis step. 41+1=54^1 + 1 = 5 and 3∀53 \nmid 5, so P(1)P(1) is false. The next cases are 1717 and 6565, also not multiples of 33.

Every case. 4≑1(mod3)4 \equiv 1 \pmod 3, so 4n≑1(mod3)4^n \equiv 1 \pmod 3 and 4n+1≑2(mod3)4^n + 1 \equiv 2 \pmod 3. Thus P(n)P(n) is false for every n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}: without a true basis step, the inductive step proves nothing.

Problem 3 Β· Forty Cases Are Not a Proof

Given: P(n) ⁣:n2βˆ’n+41P(n)\colon n^2 - n + 41 is prime. The cases P(1),P(2),…,P(40)P(1), P(2), \dots, P(40) are all true.

What is 412βˆ’41+4141^2 - 41 + 41, and is it prime?

Among these values of kk, for which is the conditional P(k)β†’P(k+1)P(k) \to P(k+1) false?

βœ… Correct! P(40)P(40) is true and P(41)P(41) is false, so (βˆ€k∈N) (P(k)β†’P(k+1))(\forall k \in \mathbb{N})\,(P(k) \to P(k+1)) is false and no inductive step can ever be proved.
❌ Not quite. 16011601 is the value at n=40n = 40: 402βˆ’40+41=160140^2 - 40 + 41 = 1601. At n=41n = 41 the last two terms cancel.
❌ Close, but… 16811681 is the right value, but 412βˆ’41+41=412=41β‹…4141^2 - 41 + 41 = 41^2 = 41 \cdot 41, which is not prime.
❌ Not quite. 17631763 is the value at n=42n = 42: 422βˆ’42+41=176342^2 - 42 + 41 = 1763. At n=41n = 41 the value is 41241^2.
❌ Not quite. P(39)P(39) is true (15231523 is prime) and P(40)P(40) is true (16011601 is prime), so P(39)β†’P(40)P(39) \to P(40) is true.
❌ Not quite. P(41)P(41) is false, and a conditional with a false hypothesis is true, so P(41)β†’P(42)P(41) \to P(42) is true.
❌ Not quite. P(42)P(42) is false (1763=41β‹…431763 = 41 \cdot 43), so the conditional P(42)β†’P(43)P(42) \to P(43) has a false hypothesis and is true.
❌ Not quite. Substitute n=41n = 41: 412βˆ’41+41=41241^2 - 41 + 41 = 41^2.
❌ Not quite. A conditional is false only when its hypothesis is true and its conclusion is false.
Show solution

The value at n=41n = 41. The last two terms cancel:

412βˆ’41+41=412=1681=41β‹…41,41^2 - 41 + 41 = 41^2 = 1681 = 41 \cdot 41,

so 16811681 is not prime and P(41)P(41) is false.

The failing conditional. P(k)β†’P(k+1)P(k) \to P(k+1) is false exactly when P(k)P(k) is true and P(k+1)P(k+1) is false.

  • k=39k = 39: P(39)P(39) (15231523, prime) and P(40)P(40) (16011601, prime) are both true, so the conditional is true.
  • k=40k = 40: P(40)P(40) is true and P(41)P(41) is false, so the conditional is false.
  • k=41k = 41 and k=42k = 42: P(41)P(41) and P(42)P(42) are false (1763=41β‹…431763 = 41 \cdot 43), so both conditionals are true.

Since the inductive step must hold for every kk, including k=40k = 40, it cannot be proved. Forty true cases are evidence, not a proof.

Problem 4 Β· The Same Proof for 6∣(7nβˆ’1)6 \mid (7^n - 1)

Given: P(n) ⁣:6∣(7nβˆ’1)P(n)\colon 6 \mid (7^n - 1). In the inductive step, assume 7kβˆ’1=6m7^k - 1 = 6m for some integer mm.

Then 7k+1βˆ’1=6s7^{k+1} - 1 = 6s for which integer ss?

Which congruence states the same proposition? (a≑b(modn)a \equiv b \pmod n means n∣(aβˆ’b)n \mid (a - b).)

βœ… Correct! 7k+1βˆ’1=7(6m+1)βˆ’1=42m+6=6(7m+1)7^{k+1} - 1 = 7(6m + 1) - 1 = 42m + 6 = 6(7m + 1), and 6∣(7nβˆ’1)6 \mid (7^n - 1) says exactly that 7n≑1(mod6)7^n \equiv 1 \pmod 6.
❌ Close, but… the 77 multiplies both terms of 6m+16m + 1: 7(6m+1)βˆ’1=42m+7βˆ’1=42m+67(6m + 1) - 1 = 42m + 7 - 1 = 42m + 6.
❌ Not quite. 6m+16m + 1 is 7k7^k, from the hypothesis. The goal needs 7k+1βˆ’1=7β‹…7kβˆ’17^{k+1} - 1 = 7 \cdot 7^k - 1 written as 66 times an integer.
❌ Check the sign. 7(6m+1)βˆ’1=42m+6=6(7m+1)7(6m + 1) - 1 = 42m + 6 = 6(7m + 1); the factor 4mβˆ’14m - 1 in the 3∣(4n+1)3 \mid (4^n + 1) example came from a different hypothesis.
❌ Not quite. 7n≑0(mod6)7^n \equiv 0 \pmod 6 means 6∣7n6 \mid 7^n, which is false: 7=6β‹…1+17 = 6 \cdot 1 + 1.
❌ Not quite. That means 7∣(7nβˆ’1)7 \mid (7^n - 1), which is false because 7∣7n7 \mid 7^n. The modulus must be 66.
❌ Not quite. 7nβ‰‘βˆ’1(mod6)7^n \equiv -1 \pmod 6 means 6∣(7n+1)6 \mid (7^n + 1); already 7+1=87 + 1 = 8 is not a multiple of 66.
❌ Not quite. Write 7k+1βˆ’1=7β‹…7kβˆ’17^{k+1} - 1 = 7 \cdot 7^k - 1 and substitute 7k=6m+17^k = 6m + 1.
❌ Not quite. 6∣(7nβˆ’1)6 \mid (7^n - 1) is the definition of 7n≑1(mod6)7^n \equiv 1 \pmod 6.
Show solution

Inductive step. From 7kβˆ’1=6m7^k - 1 = 6m we get 7k=6m+17^k = 6m + 1. Since 7k+1=7β‹…7k7^{k+1} = 7 \cdot 7^k,

7k+1βˆ’1=7β‹…7kβˆ’1=7(6m+1)βˆ’1=42m+7βˆ’1=42m+6=6(7m+1).7^{k+1} - 1 = 7 \cdot 7^k - 1 = 7(6m + 1) - 1 = 42m + 7 - 1 = 42m + 6 = 6(7m + 1).

So s=7m+1s = 7m + 1, an integer, and 6∣(7k+1βˆ’1)6 \mid (7^{k+1} - 1).

Congruence form. By definition, 7n≑1(mod6)7^n \equiv 1 \pmod 6 means 6∣(7nβˆ’1)6 \mid (7^n - 1), so the proposition is: for every n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, 7n≑1(mod6)7^n \equiv 1 \pmod 6. The congruence proof mirrors the video's: 7≑1(mod6)7 \equiv 1 \pmod 6 gives P(1)P(1), and multiplying 7k≑1(mod6)7^k \equiv 1 \pmod 6 by 7≑7(mod6)7 \equiv 7 \pmod 6 gives 7k+1≑7(mod6)7^{k+1} \equiv 7 \pmod 6; since 7≑1(mod6)7 \equiv 1 \pmod 6, transitivity gives 7k+1≑1(mod6)7^{k+1} \equiv 1 \pmod 6.

Solved: 0 / 4