Mathematical-Reasoning · Unit 13 · Video 2 · Interactive Practice

Extended Induction: Start the Basis Step at Any Integer M

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameRole
M∈TM \in T and, for every k∈Zk \in \mathbb{Z} with k≥Mk \ge M, k∈T→(k+1)∈Tk \in T \to (k + 1) \in THypotheses of the Extended Principle (M∈ZM \in \mathbb{Z}, T⊆ZT \subseteq \mathbb{Z})The two conditions to verify
{n∈Z∣n≥M}⊆T\{n \in \mathbb{Z} \mid n \ge M\} \subseteq TConclusion of the Extended PrincipleEvery integer from MM on is in TT
Basis P(M)P(M); for k≥Mk \ge M: P(k)→P(k+1)P(k) \to P(k + 1)Proof by induction starting at MMProves P(n)P(n) for every n∈Zn \in \mathbb{Z} with n≥Mn \ge M
(k+1)!=(k+1)⋅k!>(k+1)⋅2k>2⋅2k=2k+1(k + 1)! = (k + 1) \cdot k! > (k + 1) \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot 2^k = 2^{k + 1}Inductive step for n!>2nn! > 2^nUses P(k)P(k), then k+1>2k + 1 > 2 (true since k≥4k \ge 4)

Key Insight: The basis step decides where the guarantee starts: induction from MM covers every integer n≥Mn \ge M and says nothing about the integers below MM.

IIVisualization 1 — Knock Over Domino MM

A true basis P(M)P(M) plus a step from MM on proves P(n)P(n) for every n≥Mn \ge M, and nothing below MM.

IIIVisualization 2 — Where k≥4k \ge 4 Enters the Step

The chain (k+1)!>(k+1)⋅2k>2k+1(k + 1)! > (k + 1) \cdot 2^k > 2^{k + 1} needs both P(k)P(k) and k+1>2k + 1 > 2.

IVVisualization 3 — Find the Starting Value MM

Where does the run of true cases begin? That first case is the basis MM a proof would use.

💡 Ten checked cases only support a conjecture "for each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, if n≥Mn \ge M, then P(n)P(n)"; a proof still needs the basis P(M)P(M) and the inductive step for every k≥Mk \ge M.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 · The Basis Step

Given: a proof by induction of "for each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N} with n≥6n \ge 6, 2n>(n+1)22^n > (n + 1)^2." Which statement must the basis step verify?

✅ Correct! The starting integer is M=6M = 6, and 26=64>49=722^6 = 64 > 49 = 7^2, so P(6)P(6) is true.
❌ Not quite. The statement starts at n=6n = 6, so the basis is P(6)P(6), not P(1)P(1). Here P(1)P(1) is even false: 2>42 > 4 fails.
❌ Not quite. P(5)P(5) is not part of the claim, and it is false: 25=32<36=622^5 = 32 < 36 = 6^2. The basis is the first integer the claim covers, M=6M = 6.
❌ Not quite. A basis at 77 would prove P(n)P(n) only for n≥7n \ge 7 and leave n=6n = 6 unproved. The basis must be P(6)P(6).
Show solution

The claim has the form "for each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, if n≥Mn \ge M, then P(n)P(n)" with M=6M = 6 and P(n)P(n): 2n>(n+1)22^n > (n + 1)^2. The basis step of the Extended Principle proves P(M)=P(6)P(M) = P(6):

26=64>49=(6+1)2.2^6 = 64 > 49 = (6 + 1)^2.

The inductive step then proves P(k)→P(k+1)P(k) \to P(k + 1) for every k≥6k \ge 6.

Problem 2 · Where the Start at 4 Is Used

Given: the inductive step for n!>2nn! > 2^n: let k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N} with k≥4k \ge 4 and assume k!>2kk! > 2^k; then (k+1)!=(k+1)⋅k!>(k+1)⋅2k>2⋅2k=2k+1(k + 1)! = (k + 1) \cdot k! > (k + 1) \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot 2^k = 2^{k + 1}. Where does the step use k≥4k \ge 4?

✅ Correct! k≥4k \ge 4 gives k+1≥5>2k + 1 \ge 5 > 2; multiplying k+1>2k + 1 > 2 by 2k>02^k > 0 gives the second link of the chain.
❌ Not quite. k!>2kk! > 2^k is the inductive hypothesis P(k)P(k): it is assumed, not derived from k≥4k \ge 4.
❌ Not quite. k+1>0k + 1 > 0 holds for every natural number kk; it needs no lower bound like 44.
❌ Not quite. The link (k+1)⋅2k>2⋅2k(k + 1) \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot 2^k is false when k=1k = 1 (4>44 > 4 fails), so it needs a lower bound on kk; the proof gets it from k≥4k \ge 4.
Show solution

The chain has two links.

Link (2): multiply the hypothesis k!>2kk! > 2^k by k+1>0k + 1 > 0 (true for every k∈Nk \in \mathbb{N}): (k+1)!>(k+1)⋅2k(k + 1)! > (k + 1) \cdot 2^k.

Link (3): since k≥4k \ge 4, k+1>2k + 1 > 2; multiplying by 2k>02^k > 0 gives (k+1)⋅2k>2⋅2k=2k+1(k + 1) \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot 2^k = 2^{k + 1}.

So k≥4k \ge 4 is used exactly once, to get k+1>2k + 1 > 2. (Any k≥2k \ge 2 would do there; the basis is P(4)P(4) because P(3)P(3) is false: 3!=6<8=233! = 6 < 8 = 2^3.)

Problem 3 · Build the Inductive Step

Given: the conjecture "for each n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, if n≥2n \ge 2, then 3n>1+2n3^n > 1 + 2^n." Let k≥2k \ge 2 and assume 3k>1+2k3^k > 1 + 2^k. Which chain correctly proves 3k+1>1+2k+13^{k + 1} > 1 + 2^{k + 1}?

✅ Correct! Each step is justified: multiply the hypothesis by 33, then use 3>13 > 1 and 3⋅2k>2⋅2k3 \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot 2^k.
❌ Not quite. 3k+1=3⋅3k3^{k + 1} = 3 \cdot 3^k, not 3k+33^k + 3 (for k=2k = 2: 27≠1227 \ne 12).
❌ Not quite. 3⋅2k≠2k+13 \cdot 2^k \ne 2^{k + 1}; 2k+1=2⋅2k2^{k + 1} = 2 \cdot 2^k. The chain needs 3⋅2k>2⋅2k3 \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot 2^k as its own step.
❌ Not quite. 3k+1>2k+13^{k + 1} > 2^{k + 1} does not give 3k+1>1+2k+13^{k + 1} > 1 + 2^{k + 1} (compare 3>23 > 2 with 3>33 > 3), and this argument never uses the hypothesis P(k)P(k).
Show solution

Assume 3k>1+2k3^k > 1 + 2^k (inequality (1)). Multiply (1) by 3>03 > 0:

3k+1=3⋅3k>3(1+2k)=3+3⋅2k.3^{k + 1} = 3 \cdot 3^k > 3(1 + 2^k) = 3 + 3 \cdot 2^k.

Since 3>13 > 1 and 3⋅2k>2⋅2k3 \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot 2^k (because 2k>02^k > 0),

3+3⋅2k>1+2⋅2k=1+2k+1.3 + 3 \cdot 2^k > 1 + 2 \cdot 2^k = 1 + 2^{k + 1}.

Together: 3k+1>1+2k+13^{k + 1} > 1 + 2^{k + 1}, so P(k+1)P(k + 1) is true. With the basis P(2)P(2): 9>59 > 5, the Extended Principle with M=2M = 2 proves the conjecture.

Problem 4 · Which Conclusion Is Proved?

Given: P(n)P(n): 2n>n22^n > n^2. Scratch work shows: if 2k>k22^k > k^2, then 2k+1=2⋅2k>2k22^{k + 1} = 2 \cdot 2^k > 2k^2, and 2k2≥(k+1)22k^2 \ge (k + 1)^2 for every natural number k≥3k \ge 3. So P(k)→P(k+1)P(k) \to P(k + 1) is proved for every k≥3k \ge 3. Also P(1)P(1) is true (2>12 > 1). Which conclusion does the Extended Principle justify?

✅ Correct! P(5)P(5) is true (32>2532 > 25) and 5≥35 \ge 3, so the step holds for every k≥5k \ge 5.
❌ Not quite. The step is proved only for k≥3k \ge 3, so P(1)P(1) cannot start the chain; in fact P(2)P(2) is false (4>44 > 4 fails).
❌ Not quite. The step holds from 33 on, but the basis P(3)P(3) is false: 23=8<9=322^3 = 8 < 9 = 3^2.
❌ Not quite. The basis P(4)P(4) is false: 24=16=422^4 = 16 = 4^2, and 16>1616 > 16 fails.
Show solution

The Extended Principle needs a true basis P(M)P(M) and the inductive step for every k≥Mk \ge M. The step is available for k≥3k \ge 3, so M≥3M \ge 3. Check the candidates:

  • P(3)P(3): 8>98 > 9 is false.
  • P(4)P(4): 16>1616 > 16 is false.
  • P(5)P(5): 32>2532 > 25 is true.

With M=5M = 5: the basis holds, and every k≥5k \ge 5 satisfies k≥3k \ge 3, so the step holds. Conclusion: 2n>n22^n > n^2 for every n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N} with n≥5n \ge 5. The true case P(1)P(1) is not covered by this proof; it is checked separately.

Solved: 0 / 4