Mathematical-Reasoning Β· Unit 17 Β· Video 2 Β· Interactive Practice
Laws of Union and Intersection: Proving A β© B = B β© A
I Key Formulas
Key Insight: A chain x β S β
β βΊ β
β β― β
β βΊ β
β x β T x \in S \iff \cdots \iff x \in T x β S βΊ β― βΊ x β T proves S = T S = T S = T only when every link holds in both directions, as a definition or a logical equivalence does; a single one-way step β \Rightarrow β (read from S S S toward T T T ) leaves only S β T S \subseteq T S β T .
II Intersect or Unite Both Sides with the Same C C C
If A β B A \subseteq B A β B , then A β© C β B β© C A \cap C \subseteq B \cap C A β© C β B β© C and A βͺ C β B βͺ C A \cup C \subseteq B \cup C A βͺ C β B βͺ C ; the converses can fail.
III One Chain, Every Element
Wherever x x x lies in U U U , all four statements in the chain have the same truth value.
Operation
β© (and)
βͺ (or)
x β A only
x β A and B
x β B only
x in neither
IV Two-Way Links and One-Way Steps
A link may sit in an equality chain only if it holds both ways in all four regions.
Link
x β A β© B βΊ? x β A and x β B
x β A and x β B βΊ? x β B and x β A
x β A β© B βΊ? x β A
x β A βΊ? x β A βͺ B
x β A βͺ B βΊ? x β B or x β A
x β A β© B βΊ? x β A βͺ B
π‘ The four regions are the four rows of a truth table for "x β A x \in A x β A " and "x β B x \in B x β B ", so a link that agrees in all four holds for every x β U x \in U x β U .
V Quiz Questions
Problem 1 Β· Combine the Two Claims of Part 1
Given: A A A , B B B and C C C are subsets of a universal set U U U . Which statement is true for every choice of A A A , B B B and C C C ?
a A β© B β A βͺ C A \cap B \subseteq A \cup C A β© B β A βͺ C
b A βͺ B β A A \cup B \subseteq A A βͺ B β A
c A β A β© B A \subseteq A \cap B A β A β© B
d A βͺ C β A β© C A \cup C \subseteq A \cap C A βͺ C β A β© C
β
Correct! A β© B β A A \cap B \subseteq A A β© B β A and
A β A βͺ C A \subseteq A \cup C A β A βͺ C , and subset is transitive.
β That inclusion points the wrong way. A union contains each of its sets:
A = β
A = \emptyset A = β
,
B = { 1 } B = \{1\} B = { 1 } gives
A βͺ B = { 1 } βΜΈ A A \cup B = \{1\} \not\subseteq A A βͺ B = { 1 } ξ β A .
β That inclusion points the wrong way. An intersection sits inside each of its sets:
A = { 1 } A = \{1\} A = { 1 } ,
B = β
B = \emptyset B = β
gives
A βΜΈ A β© B = β
A \not\subseteq A \cap B = \emptyset A ξ β A β© B = β
.
β Not quite. Take
A = { 1 } A = \{1\} A = { 1 } and
C = { 2 } C = \{2\} C = { 2 } :
A βͺ C = { 1 , 2 } A \cup C = \{1, 2\} A βͺ C = { 1 , 2 } but
A β© C = β
A \cap C = \emptyset A β© C = β
, so a union is generally not inside an intersection.
Show solution
By Part 1 of the theorem, A β© B β A A \cap B \subseteq A A β© B β A (an intersection is contained in each set it is formed from) and A β A βͺ C A \subseteq A \cup C A β A βͺ C (a union contains each of its sets). Element by element: let x β A β© B x \in A \cap B x β A β© B . Then x β A x \in A x β A and x β B x \in B x β B , so x β A x \in A x β A . Hence "x β A x \in A x β A or x β C x \in C x β C " is true, so x β A βͺ C x \in A \cup C x β A βͺ C . Therefore A β© B β A βͺ C A \cap B \subseteq A \cup C A β© B β A βͺ C .
The other three fail for some sets:
(b) A = β
A = \emptyset A = β
, B = { 1 } B = \{1\} B = { 1 } : A βͺ B = { 1 } βΜΈ β
A \cup B = \{1\} \not\subseteq \emptyset A βͺ B = { 1 } ξ β β
.
(c) A = { 1 } A = \{1\} A = { 1 } , B = β
B = \emptyset B = β
: A = { 1 } βΜΈ A β© B = β
A = \{1\} \not\subseteq A \cap B = \emptyset A = { 1 } ξ β A β© B = β
.
(d) A = { 1 } A = \{1\} A = { 1 } , C = { 2 } C = \{2\} C = { 2 } : A βͺ C = { 1 , 2 } βΜΈ A β© C = β
A \cup C = \{1, 2\} \not\subseteq A \cap C = \emptyset A βͺ C = { 1 , 2 } ξ β A β© C = β
.
Problem 2 Β· What the Converse Does Not Give
Given: A A A , B B B , C β U C \subseteq U C β U and A β© C β B β© C A \cap C \subseteq B \cap C A β© C β B β© C . Which conclusion always follows?
a A β B A \subseteq B A β B
b A β B A \subseteq B A β B , provided C β β
C \neq \emptyset C ξ = β
c A β© C β B A \cap C \subseteq B A β© C β B
d A β© C = B β© C A \cap C = B \cap C A β© C = B β© C
β
Correct! Each element of
A β© C A \cap C A β© C lies in
B β© C B \cap C B β© C , and
B β© C β B B \cap C \subseteq B B β© C β B .
β That is the converse of Part 2, and it is false. With
C = β
C = \emptyset C = β
, both intersections are empty for any
A A A and
B B B ; for example
A = { 1 } A = \{1\} A = { 1 } ,
B = β
B = \emptyset B = β
.
β A nonempty C C C does not rescue the converse. Take
A = { 1 } A = \{1\} A = { 1 } ,
B = β
B = \emptyset B = β
,
C = { 2 } C = \{2\} C = { 2 } :
A β© C = β
β B β© C = β
A \cap C = \emptyset \subseteq B \cap C = \emptyset A β© C = β
β B β© C = β
, yet
1 β A 1 \in A 1 β A and
1 β B 1 \notin B 1 β / B .
β The hypothesis is only an inclusion. Take
A = β
A = \emptyset A = β
,
B = C = { 1 } B = C = \{1\} B = C = { 1 } :
A β© C = β
β { 1 } = B β© C A \cap C = \emptyset \subseteq \{1\} = B \cap C A β© C = β
β { 1 } = B β© C , but the two intersections are not equal.
β Not quite. The hypothesis says nothing about elements of
A A A that are not in
C C C .
Show solution
(c) holds. Let x β A β© C x \in A \cap C x β A β© C . By the hypothesis, x β B β© C x \in B \cap C x β B β© C , so x β B x \in B x β B and x β C x \in C x β C ; in particular x β B x \in B x β B . Hence A β© C β B A \cap C \subseteq B A β© C β B .
The others fail. The hypothesis only restricts elements of A A A that also lie in C C C .
(a) C = β
C = \emptyset C = β
, A = { 1 } A = \{1\} A = { 1 } , B = β
B = \emptyset B = β
: A β© C = β
β β
= B β© C A \cap C = \emptyset \subseteq \emptyset = B \cap C A β© C = β
β β
= B β© C , but A βΜΈ B A \not\subseteq B A ξ β B . This is the video's counterexample to the converse.
(b) C = { 2 } C = \{2\} C = { 2 } , A = { 1 } A = \{1\} A = { 1 } , B = β
B = \emptyset B = β
: again both intersections are empty and A βΜΈ B A \not\subseteq B A ξ β B .
(d) A = β
A = \emptyset A = β
, B = C = { 1 } B = C = \{1\} B = C = { 1 } : A β© C = β
β { 1 } = B β© C A \cap C = \emptyset \subseteq \{1\} = B \cap C A β© C = β
β { 1 } = B β© C , but A β© C β B β© C A \cap C \neq B \cap C A β© C ξ = B β© C .
Problem 3 Β· Audit a Chain
Given: A student writes, for x β U x \in U x β U ,
x β A β© B β
β βΊ β
β ( 1 ) x β A Β andΒ x β B β
β βΊ β
β ( 2 ) x β A β
β βΊ β
β ( 3 ) x β A βͺ B , x \in A \cap B \overset{(1)}{\iff} x \in A \text{ and } x \in B \overset{(2)}{\iff} x \in A \overset{(3)}{\iff} x \in A \cup B, x β A β© B βΊ ( 1 ) β x β A Β andΒ x β B βΊ ( 2 ) β x β A βΊ ( 3 ) β x β A βͺ B ,
and concludes A β© B = A βͺ B A \cap B = A \cup B A β© B = A βͺ B . Which assessment is right?
a Every link is valid, so A β© B = A βͺ B A \cap B = A \cup B A β© B = A βͺ B for all A A A , B B B .
b Only link (2) fails backward; links (1) and (3) are two-way.
c Link (1) fails, so the chain proves nothing.
d Links (2) and (3) hold only forward, so the chain proves only A β© B β A βͺ B A \cap B \subseteq A \cup B A β© B β A βͺ B .
β
Correct! Two one-way steps; chaining the forward directions still gives
x β A β© B β x β A βͺ B x \in A \cap B \Rightarrow x \in A \cup B x β A β© B β x β A βͺ B .
β Not quite. Take
A = { 1 } A = \{1\} A = { 1 } ,
B = β
B = \emptyset B = β
:
A β© B = β
A \cap B = \emptyset A β© B = β
but
A βͺ B = { 1 } A \cup B = \{1\} A βͺ B = { 1 } , so the conclusion is false and some link must fail.
β Link (3) fails backward too. From
x β A βͺ B x \in A \cup B x β A βͺ B we cannot get
x β A x \in A x β A : an element of
B B B outside
A A A is in
A βͺ B A \cup B A βͺ B .
β Link (1) is the definition of intersection , which holds in both directions.
Show solution
Write P P P for "x β A x \in A x β A " and Q Q Q for "x β B x \in B x β B ".
(1) x β A β© B β
β βΊ β
β P β§ Q x \in A \cap B \iff P \wedge Q x β A β© B βΊ P β§ Q : the definition of β© \cap β© , two-way.
(2) P β§ Q β P P \wedge Q \Rightarrow P P β§ Q β P is true, but P β P β§ Q P \Rightarrow P \wedge Q P β P β§ Q fails when P P P is true and Q Q Q false (x β A x \in A x β A , x β B x \notin B x β / B ).
(3) P β P β¨ Q P \Rightarrow P \vee Q P β P β¨ Q is true, but P β¨ Q β P P \vee Q \Rightarrow P P β¨ Q β P fails when P P P is false and Q Q Q true (x β B x \in B x β B , x β A x \notin A x β / A ).
Chaining only the forward directions gives: if x β A β© B x \in A \cap B x β A β© B , then x β A βͺ B x \in A \cup B x β A βͺ B . Since x x x was arbitrary, the chain proves A β© B β A βͺ B A \cap B \subseteq A \cup B A β© B β A βͺ B and nothing more. Equality is false in general: A = { 1 } A = \{1\} A = { 1 } , B = β
B = \emptyset B = β
gives β
β { 1 } \emptyset \ne \{1\} β
ξ = { 1 } .
Problem 4 Β· A Chain for a New Law
Given: for x β U x \in U x β U ,
x β A β© ( A βͺ B ) β
β βΊ β
β x β A Β andΒ ( x β A Β orΒ x β B ) β
β βΊ β
β β
β ? x \in A \cap (A \cup B) \iff x \in A \text{ and } (x \in A \text{ or } x \in B) \iff \;? x β A β© ( A βͺ B ) βΊ x β A Β andΒ ( x β A Β orΒ x β B ) βΊ ?
With P P P = "x β A x \in A x β A " and Q Q Q = "x β B x \in B x β B ", which logical equivalence closes the chain in one two-way link (check each candidate with a truth table), and what set equality does the chain prove?
Which equivalence is valid?
a P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β‘ P β¨ Q P \wedge (P \vee Q) \equiv P \vee Q P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β‘ P β¨ Q
b P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β‘ P P \wedge (P \vee Q) \equiv P P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β‘ P
c P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β‘ P β§ Q P \wedge (P \vee Q) \equiv P \wedge Q P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β‘ P β§ Q
d P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β‘ Q P \wedge (P \vee Q) \equiv Q P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β‘ Q
Which equality does the chain prove?
a A β© ( A βͺ B ) = A βͺ B A \cap (A \cup B) = A \cup B A β© ( A βͺ B ) = A βͺ B
b A β© ( A βͺ B ) = A β© B A \cap (A \cup B) = A \cap B A β© ( A βͺ B ) = A β© B
c A β© ( A βͺ B ) = A A \cap (A \cup B) = A A β© ( A βͺ B ) = A
d A β© ( A βͺ B ) = B A \cap (A \cup B) = B A β© ( A βͺ B ) = B
β
Correct! x β A β© ( A βͺ B ) β
β βΊ β
β P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β
β βΊ β
β P β
β βΊ β
β x β A x \in A \cap (A \cup B) \iff P \wedge (P \vee Q) \iff P \iff x \in A x β A β© ( A βͺ B ) βΊ P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) βΊ P βΊ x β A , so
A β© ( A βͺ B ) = A A \cap (A \cup B) = A A β© ( A βͺ B ) = A .
β Check the truth table. When
P P P is false,
P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) P \wedge (P \vee Q) P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) is false whatever
Q Q Q is; when
P P P is true, it is true whatever
Q Q Q is.
β Not quite. The last statement of the chain is
x β A x \in A x β A , so the set on the right is the set of elements making that statement true.
Show solution
Truth table for P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) P \wedge (P \vee Q) P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) :
The last column equals the P P P column, so P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β‘ P P \wedge (P \vee Q) \equiv P P β§ ( P β¨ Q ) β‘ P . The other three fail: P β¨ Q P \vee Q P β¨ Q differs from it in row 3, and P β§ Q P \wedge Q P β§ Q and Q Q Q differ from it in row 2. Then
x β A β© ( A βͺ B ) β
β βΊ β
β x β A Β andΒ ( x β A Β orΒ x β B ) β
β βΊ β
β x β A , x \in A \cap (A \cup B) \iff x \in A \text{ and } (x \in A \text{ or } x \in B) \iff x \in A, x β A β© ( A βͺ B ) βΊ x β A Β andΒ ( x β A Β orΒ x β B ) βΊ x β A ,
using the definitions of β© \cap β© and βͺ \cup βͺ , then the equivalence. Every link is two-way and x β U x \in U x β U was arbitrary, so A β© ( A βͺ B ) = A A \cap (A \cup B) = A A β© ( A βͺ B ) = A .
Solved: 0 / 4