Mathematical-Reasoning Β· Unit 17 Β· Video 2 Β· Interactive Practice

Laws of Union and Intersection: Proving A ∩ B = B ∩ A

IKey Formulas

StatementFor subsets of UUName
A∩BβŠ†AA \cap B \subseteq A and AβŠ†AβˆͺBA \subseteq A \cup Bany AA, BBTheorem, Part 1
A∩CβŠ†B∩CA \cap C \subseteq B \cap C and AβˆͺCβŠ†BβˆͺCA \cup C \subseteq B \cup Cwhenever AβŠ†BA \subseteq BTheorem, Part 2
A∩B=B∩AA \cap B = B \cap A and AβˆͺB=BβˆͺAA \cup B = B \cup Aany AA, BBCommutative laws
S=Tβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Š(forΒ eachΒ x∈U,Β x∈Sβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Šx∈T)S = T \iff \big(\text{for each } x \in U,\ x \in S \iff x \in T\big)any SS, TTEquality, element by element

Key Insight: A chain x∈Sβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Šβ‹―β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Šx∈Tx \in S \iff \cdots \iff x \in T proves S=TS = T only when every link holds in both directions, as a definition or a logical equivalence does; a single one-way step β‡’\Rightarrow (read from SS toward TT) leaves only SβŠ†TS \subseteq T.

IIIntersect or Unite Both Sides with the Same CC

If AβŠ†BA \subseteq B, then A∩CβŠ†B∩CA \cap C \subseteq B \cap C and AβˆͺCβŠ†BβˆͺCA \cup C \subseteq B \cup C; the converses can fail.

IIIOne Chain, Every Element

Wherever xx lies in UU, all four statements in the chain have the same truth value.

IVTwo-Way Links and One-Way Steps

A link may sit in an equality chain only if it holds both ways in all four regions.

πŸ’‘ The four regions are the four rows of a truth table for "x∈Ax \in A" and "x∈Bx \in B", so a link that agrees in all four holds for every x∈Ux \in U.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 Β· Combine the Two Claims of Part 1

Given: AA, BB and CC are subsets of a universal set UU. Which statement is true for every choice of AA, BB and CC?

βœ… Correct! A∩BβŠ†AA \cap B \subseteq A and AβŠ†AβˆͺCA \subseteq A \cup C, and subset is transitive.
❌ That inclusion points the wrong way. A union contains each of its sets: A=βˆ…A = \emptyset, B={1}B = \{1\} gives AβˆͺB={1}βŠ†ΜΈAA \cup B = \{1\} \not\subseteq A.
❌ That inclusion points the wrong way. An intersection sits inside each of its sets: A={1}A = \{1\}, B=βˆ…B = \emptyset gives AβŠ†ΜΈA∩B=βˆ…A \not\subseteq A \cap B = \emptyset.
❌ Not quite. Take A={1}A = \{1\} and C={2}C = \{2\}: AβˆͺC={1,2}A \cup C = \{1, 2\} but A∩C=βˆ…A \cap C = \emptyset, so a union is generally not inside an intersection.
Show solution

By Part 1 of the theorem, A∩BβŠ†AA \cap B \subseteq A (an intersection is contained in each set it is formed from) and AβŠ†AβˆͺCA \subseteq A \cup C (a union contains each of its sets). Element by element: let x∈A∩Bx \in A \cap B. Then x∈Ax \in A and x∈Bx \in B, so x∈Ax \in A. Hence "x∈Ax \in A or x∈Cx \in C" is true, so x∈AβˆͺCx \in A \cup C. Therefore A∩BβŠ†AβˆͺCA \cap B \subseteq A \cup C.

The other three fail for some sets:

  • (b) A=βˆ…A = \emptyset, B={1}B = \{1\}: AβˆͺB={1}βŠ†ΜΈβˆ…A \cup B = \{1\} \not\subseteq \emptyset.
  • (c) A={1}A = \{1\}, B=βˆ…B = \emptyset: A={1}βŠ†ΜΈA∩B=βˆ…A = \{1\} \not\subseteq A \cap B = \emptyset.
  • (d) A={1}A = \{1\}, C={2}C = \{2\}: AβˆͺC={1,2}βŠ†ΜΈA∩C=βˆ…A \cup C = \{1, 2\} \not\subseteq A \cap C = \emptyset.

Problem 2 Β· What the Converse Does Not Give

Given: AA, BB, CβŠ†UC \subseteq U and A∩CβŠ†B∩CA \cap C \subseteq B \cap C. Which conclusion always follows?

βœ… Correct! Each element of A∩CA \cap C lies in B∩CB \cap C, and B∩CβŠ†BB \cap C \subseteq B.
❌ That is the converse of Part 2, and it is false. With C=βˆ…C = \emptyset, both intersections are empty for any AA and BB; for example A={1}A = \{1\}, B=βˆ…B = \emptyset.
❌ A nonempty CC does not rescue the converse. Take A={1}A = \{1\}, B=βˆ…B = \emptyset, C={2}C = \{2\}: A∩C=βˆ…βŠ†B∩C=βˆ…A \cap C = \emptyset \subseteq B \cap C = \emptyset, yet 1∈A1 \in A and 1βˆ‰B1 \notin B.
❌ The hypothesis is only an inclusion. Take A=βˆ…A = \emptyset, B=C={1}B = C = \{1\}: A∩C=βˆ…βŠ†{1}=B∩CA \cap C = \emptyset \subseteq \{1\} = B \cap C, but the two intersections are not equal.
❌ Not quite. The hypothesis says nothing about elements of AA that are not in CC.
Show solution

(c) holds. Let x∈A∩Cx \in A \cap C. By the hypothesis, x∈B∩Cx \in B \cap C, so x∈Bx \in B and x∈Cx \in C; in particular x∈Bx \in B. Hence A∩CβŠ†BA \cap C \subseteq B.

The others fail. The hypothesis only restricts elements of AA that also lie in CC.

  • (a) C=βˆ…C = \emptyset, A={1}A = \{1\}, B=βˆ…B = \emptyset: A∩C=βˆ…βŠ†βˆ…=B∩CA \cap C = \emptyset \subseteq \emptyset = B \cap C, but AβŠ†ΜΈBA \not\subseteq B. This is the video's counterexample to the converse.
  • (b) C={2}C = \{2\}, A={1}A = \{1\}, B=βˆ…B = \emptyset: again both intersections are empty and AβŠ†ΜΈBA \not\subseteq B.
  • (d) A=βˆ…A = \emptyset, B=C={1}B = C = \{1\}: A∩C=βˆ…βŠ†{1}=B∩CA \cap C = \emptyset \subseteq \{1\} = B \cap C, but A∩Cβ‰ B∩CA \cap C \neq B \cap C.

Problem 3 Β· Audit a Chain

Given: A student writes, for x∈Ux \in U, x∈A∩Bβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Š(1)x∈AΒ andΒ x∈Bβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Š(2)x∈Aβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Š(3)x∈AβˆͺB,x \in A \cap B \overset{(1)}{\iff} x \in A \text{ and } x \in B \overset{(2)}{\iff} x \in A \overset{(3)}{\iff} x \in A \cup B, and concludes A∩B=AβˆͺBA \cap B = A \cup B. Which assessment is right?

βœ… Correct! Two one-way steps; chaining the forward directions still gives x∈A∩Bβ‡’x∈AβˆͺBx \in A \cap B \Rightarrow x \in A \cup B.
❌ Not quite. Take A={1}A = \{1\}, B=βˆ…B = \emptyset: A∩B=βˆ…A \cap B = \emptyset but AβˆͺB={1}A \cup B = \{1\}, so the conclusion is false and some link must fail.
❌ Link (3) fails backward too. From x∈AβˆͺBx \in A \cup B we cannot get x∈Ax \in A: an element of BB outside AA is in AβˆͺBA \cup B.
❌ Link (1) is the definition of intersection, which holds in both directions.
Show solution

Write PP for "x∈Ax \in A" and QQ for "x∈Bx \in B".

  • (1) x∈A∩Bβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€ŠP∧Qx \in A \cap B \iff P \wedge Q: the definition of ∩\cap, two-way.
  • (2) P∧Qβ‡’PP \wedge Q \Rightarrow P is true, but Pβ‡’P∧QP \Rightarrow P \wedge Q fails when PP is true and QQ false (x∈Ax \in A, xβˆ‰Bx \notin B).
  • (3) Pβ‡’P∨QP \Rightarrow P \vee Q is true, but P∨Qβ‡’PP \vee Q \Rightarrow P fails when PP is false and QQ true (x∈Bx \in B, xβˆ‰Ax \notin A).

Chaining only the forward directions gives: if x∈A∩Bx \in A \cap B, then x∈AβˆͺBx \in A \cup B. Since xx was arbitrary, the chain proves A∩BβŠ†AβˆͺBA \cap B \subseteq A \cup B and nothing more. Equality is false in general: A={1}A = \{1\}, B=βˆ…B = \emptyset gives βˆ…β‰ {1}\emptyset \ne \{1\}.

Problem 4 Β· A Chain for a New Law

Given: for x∈Ux \in U, x∈A∩(AβˆͺB)β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Šx∈AΒ andΒ (x∈AΒ orΒ x∈B)β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Šβ€…β€Š?x \in A \cap (A \cup B) \iff x \in A \text{ and } (x \in A \text{ or } x \in B) \iff \;? With PP = "x∈Ax \in A" and QQ = "x∈Bx \in B", which logical equivalence closes the chain in one two-way link (check each candidate with a truth table), and what set equality does the chain prove?

Which equivalence is valid?

Which equality does the chain prove?

βœ… Correct! x∈A∩(AβˆͺB)β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€ŠP∧(P∨Q)β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€ŠPβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Šx∈Ax \in A \cap (A \cup B) \iff P \wedge (P \vee Q) \iff P \iff x \in A, so A∩(AβˆͺB)=AA \cap (A \cup B) = A.
❌ Check the truth table. When PP is false, P∧(P∨Q)P \wedge (P \vee Q) is false whatever QQ is; when PP is true, it is true whatever QQ is.
❌ Not quite. The last statement of the chain is x∈Ax \in A, so the set on the right is the set of elements making that statement true.
Show solution

Truth table for P∧(P∨Q)P \wedge (P \vee Q):

PPQQP∨QP \vee QP∧(P∨Q)P \wedge (P \vee Q)
TTTT
TFTT
FTTF
FFFF

The last column equals the PP column, so P∧(P∨Q)≑PP \wedge (P \vee Q) \equiv P. The other three fail: P∨QP \vee Q differs from it in row 3, and P∧QP \wedge Q and QQ differ from it in row 2. Then x∈A∩(AβˆͺB)β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Šx∈AΒ andΒ (x∈AΒ orΒ x∈B)β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Šx∈A,x \in A \cap (A \cup B) \iff x \in A \text{ and } (x \in A \text{ or } x \in B) \iff x \in A, using the definitions of ∩\cap and βˆͺ\cup, then the equivalence. Every link is two-way and x∈Ux \in U was arbitrary, so A∩(AβˆͺB)=AA \cap (A \cup B) = A.

Solved: 0 / 4