Expanding (2m+1)(2n+1) splits xy into blocks that pair off, with exactly one left over.
๐ก The picture needs positive x and y, but the algebra in P1โ through P5โ never uses positivity, so the proof covers every pair of odd integers, negatives included.
IVA Fresh Letter for Each New Object
Writing x=2q+1 with the goal's q would claim xy=x, which fails unless y=1.
VQuiz Questions
Problem 1 ยท The Backward Question
Given: the proposition โIf x is an even integer and y is an odd integer, then x+y is an odd integer.โ Which statement is Q1โ, the answer to the backward question โhow do we prove that an integer is odd?โ applied to the conclusion?
โ Correct! The definition of an odd integer, applied to x+y, gives the target form x+y=2q+1 for some integer q; it goes in the next-to-last row.
โ That is a forward step. It answers โwhat can we conclude from P?โ, so it is P1โ, at the top of the table, not Q1โ.
โ Not quite.2q is the form of an even integer; the conclusion says x+y is odd, so the target is 2q+1.
โ Not quite. This uses m and n from the hypothesis, so it comes from working forward (substitution), not from asking when Q holds.
โ Not quite. Ask how any integer is proved odd, then apply that answer to x+y.
Show solution
P: x is even and y is odd. Q: x+y is odd.
The backward question in the abstract is โhow do we prove that an integer is odd?โ. The answer is the definition: write it as 2q+1 for some integer q. Applied to x+y:
For completeness, working forward gives x=2m and y=2n+1, so x+y=2m+2n+1=2(m+n)+1, and m+n is an integer by closure, so q=m+n works.
Problem 2 ยท One Letter Too Few
Given: a proof of โif x and y are odd integers, then x+y is evenโ whose step P1โ reads: โThere exists an integer k such that x=2k+1 and y=2k+1.โ What is wrong with this step?
โ Correct! If x=2k+1 and y=2k+1, then x=y. The hypothesis never said that, so x and y need different letters: x=2m+1, y=2n+1.
โ Not quite. Any letter is fine for one integer, but using the same letter twice claims both integers come from the same k. Try x=3, y=5: no single k gives both.
โ Not quite. The hypothesis gives P (โx and y are oddโ); turning that into equations is exactly what the definition of an odd integer does.
โ Not quite. The definition uses 2k+1, and the sign is not the problem here; the shared letter is.
Show solution
From x=2k+1 and y=2k+1 it follows that x=y, so the step assumes something the hypothesis does not give. For x=3 we would need k=1, and for y=5 we would need k=2: one k cannot do both.
The rule of thumb: a different symbol for each new object. The corrected proof:
x=2m+1,y=2n+1ย โย x+y=2m+2n+2=2(m+n+1).
Since m, n and 1 are integers, m+n+1 is an integer by closure under addition, so x+y is even.
Problem 3 ยท Filling the Know Rows
Given: the proposition โIf x is an odd integer, then x2+3x is an even integer,โ where an integer is even when it equals 2q for some integer q. Step P1โ is x=2m+1 for some integer m. Complete the next steps.
After substitution and algebra, x2+3x equals:
So x2+3x=2q with q equal to:
The reason for โ2m2+5m+2 is an integerโ is:
โ Correct!x2+3x=4m2+10m+4=2(2m2+5m+2), and closure makes 2m2+5m+2 an integer, so x2+3x is even.
โ Check the square.(2m+1)2=(2m+1)(2m+1)=4m2+4m+1; the distributive property produces the middle term 4m.
โ Check 3x.3(2m+1)=6m+3: the 3 multiplies both terms.
โ That is half the answer. This is the integer q that comes next; x2+3x itself is twice it.
โ Not quite. Expand (2m+1)2+3(2m+1) term by term.
โ Not quite. That is x2+3x itself; q is what multiplies the 2 after factoring.
โ Check the factoring. Every one of the three terms must be divided by 2: 2(2m2+5m+2)=4m2+10m+4.
โ Not quite. Factor 2 out of all of 4m2+10m+4.
โ Not quite. The hypothesis only says that x is odd; it says nothing about the new expression 2m2+5m+2.
โ Not quite. The definition of an odd integer produced x=2m+1 in P1โ; it does not tell us that 2m2+5m+2 is an integer.
โ Not quite. The distributive property was used to factor out the 2; whether the result is an integer is a separate question about integers.
โ Not quite. Which fact says that products and sums of integers are integers?
Show solution
Backward:Q1โ is โthere exists an integer q such that x2+3x=2qโ.
Since m is an integer, m2, 2m2 and 5m are integers (closure under multiplication) and so is 2m2+5m+2 (closure under addition). With q=2m2+5m+2, Q1โ holds, so x2+3x is even. Check with m=1: x=3, x2+3x=18=2โ 9, and 2+5+2=9.
Problem 4 ยท The Same Method, a New Definition
Given: say an integer a has form A when a=3k+1 for some integer k. Prove: โIf x and y have form A, then xy has form A.โ
The backward question gives Q1โ:
With x=3m+1 and y=3n+1, the integer q is:
โ Correct!xy=9mn+3m+3n+1=3(3mn+m+n)+1, and 3mn+m+n is an integer by closure.
โ That is a forward step. It comes from the hypothesis (P1โ or P2โ); Q1โ comes from asking when an integer has form A.
โ Not quite. That is the target for an odd integer; form A asks for 3q+1.
โ Not quite. Apply the definition of form A to xy.
โ Not quite.3(9mn+3m+3n)+1=27mn+9m+9n+1, which is not xy: the 3 still has to be factored out.
โ Not quite. The +1 stays outside: 3(3mn+m+n+1)+1 is 3 more than xy.
โ Check the first term. Factoring 3 out of 9mn leaves 3mn, not mn: 3(mn+m+n)+1=3mn+3m+3n+1, which is not xy.
โ Not quite. Expand (3m+1)(3n+1) and factor 3 out of every term except the final 1.
Show solution
Backward: โhow do we prove an integer has form A?โ By the definition, so Q1โ: there exists an integer q with xy=3q+1.
Forward: by the definition, x=3m+1 and y=3n+1 for integers m and n (two letters, two objects). Then
xy=(3m+1)(3n+1)=9mn+3m+3n+1=3(3mn+m+n)+1.
By closure, 3mn+m+n is an integer, so q=3mn+m+n gives Q1โ, and xy has form A. Check: x=4, y=7 (m=1, n=2) give xy=28=3โ 9+1, and 3โ 2+1+2=9.