Mathematical-Reasoning ยท Unit 2 ยท Video 2 ยท Interactive Practice

The Know-Show Table: Proving Odd Times Odd Is Odd

IKey Formulas

ToolStatementRole in the proof
Odd integer (definition)aa is odd when a=2k+1a = 2k + 1 for some integer kkForward: unpacks PP into x=2m+1x = 2m + 1, y=2n+1y = 2n + 1. Backward: turns QQ into xy=2q+1xy = 2q + 1
Distributive propertyx(y+z)=xy+xzx(y + z) = xy + xz and (y+z)x=yx+zx(y + z)x = yx + zxExpands (2m+1)(2n+1)(2m + 1)(2n + 1)
Closure of the integersSums and products of integers are integersCertifies that 2mn+m+n2mn + m + n is an integer
The bridge(2m+1)(2n+1)=2(2mn+m+n)+1(2m + 1)(2n + 1) = 2(2mn + m + n) + 1Links P1P_1 to Q1Q_1 with q=2mn+m+nq = 2mn + m + n

Key Insight: The goal xy=2q+1xy = 2q + 1 asks only for some integer qq. Algebra writes xyxy as 2(something)+12(\text{something}) + 1, and closure proves the something is an integer.

IIWorking From Both Ends

Backward questions reshape the goal QQ, forward questions unpack the hypothesis PP, until the two ends meet.

StepKnowReason
PPxx and yy are odd integers.Hypothesis
โ‹ฎ
QQxโ‹…yx \cdot y is an odd integer.?
StepShowReason

IIIOdd Times Odd: Pairs Plus One

Expanding (2m+1)(2n+1)(2m + 1)(2n + 1) splits xyxy into blocks that pair off, with exactly one left over.

๐Ÿ’ก The picture needs positive xx and yy, but the algebra in P1P_1 through P5P_5 never uses positivity, so the proof covers every pair of odd integers, negatives included.

IVA Fresh Letter for Each New Object

Writing x=2q+1x = 2q + 1 with the goal's qq would claim xy=xxy = x, which fails unless y=1y = 1.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 ยท The Backward Question

Given: the proposition โ€œIf xx is an even integer and yy is an odd integer, then x+yx + y is an odd integer.โ€ Which statement is Q1Q_1, the answer to the backward question โ€œhow do we prove that an integer is odd?โ€ applied to the conclusion?

โœ… Correct! The definition of an odd integer, applied to x+yx + y, gives the target form x+y=2q+1x + y = 2q + 1 for some integer qq; it goes in the next-to-last row.
โŒ That is a forward step. It answers โ€œwhat can we conclude from PP?โ€, so it is P1P_1, at the top of the table, not Q1Q_1.
โŒ Not quite. 2q2q is the form of an even integer; the conclusion says x+yx + y is odd, so the target is 2q+12q + 1.
โŒ Not quite. This uses mm and nn from the hypothesis, so it comes from working forward (substitution), not from asking when QQ holds.
โŒ Not quite. Ask how any integer is proved odd, then apply that answer to x+yx + y.
Show solution

PP: xx is even and yy is odd. QQ: x+yx + y is odd.

The backward question in the abstract is โ€œhow do we prove that an integer is odd?โ€. The answer is the definition: write it as 2q+12q + 1 for some integer qq. Applied to x+yx + y:

Q1:ย thereย existsย anย integerย qย suchย thatย x+y=2q+1.Q_1:\ \text{there exists an integer } q \text{ such that } x + y = 2q + 1.

For completeness, working forward gives x=2mx = 2m and y=2n+1y = 2n + 1, so x+y=2m+2n+1=2(m+n)+1x + y = 2m + 2n + 1 = 2(m + n) + 1, and m+nm + n is an integer by closure, so q=m+nq = m + n works.

Problem 2 ยท One Letter Too Few

Given: a proof of โ€œif xx and yy are odd integers, then x+yx + y is evenโ€ whose step P1P_1 reads: โ€œThere exists an integer kk such that x=2k+1x = 2k + 1 and y=2k+1y = 2k + 1.โ€ What is wrong with this step?

โœ… Correct! If x=2k+1x = 2k + 1 and y=2k+1y = 2k + 1, then x=yx = y. The hypothesis never said that, so xx and yy need different letters: x=2m+1x = 2m + 1, y=2n+1y = 2n + 1.
โŒ Not quite. Any letter is fine for one integer, but using the same letter twice claims both integers come from the same kk. Try x=3x = 3, y=5y = 5: no single kk gives both.
โŒ Not quite. The hypothesis gives PP (โ€œxx and yy are oddโ€); turning that into equations is exactly what the definition of an odd integer does.
โŒ Not quite. The definition uses 2k+12k + 1, and the sign is not the problem here; the shared letter is.
Show solution

From x=2k+1x = 2k + 1 and y=2k+1y = 2k + 1 it follows that x=yx = y, so the step assumes something the hypothesis does not give. For x=3x = 3 we would need k=1k = 1, and for y=5y = 5 we would need k=2k = 2: one kk cannot do both.

The rule of thumb: a different symbol for each new object. The corrected proof:

x=2m+1,y=2n+1ย โ‡’ย x+y=2m+2n+2=2(m+n+1).x = 2m + 1,\quad y = 2n + 1 \ \Rightarrow\ x + y = 2m + 2n + 2 = 2(m + n + 1).

Since mm, nn and 11 are integers, m+n+1m + n + 1 is an integer by closure under addition, so x+yx + y is even.

Problem 3 ยท Filling the Know Rows

Given: the proposition โ€œIf xx is an odd integer, then x2+3xx^2 + 3x is an even integer,โ€ where an integer is even when it equals 2q2q for some integer qq. Step P1P_1 is x=2m+1x = 2m + 1 for some integer mm. Complete the next steps.

After substitution and algebra, x2+3xx^2 + 3x equals:

So x2+3x=2qx^2 + 3x = 2q with qq equal to:

The reason for โ€œ2m2+5m+22m^2 + 5m + 2 is an integerโ€ is:

โœ… Correct! x2+3x=4m2+10m+4=2(2m2+5m+2)x^2 + 3x = 4m^2 + 10m + 4 = 2(2m^2 + 5m + 2), and closure makes 2m2+5m+22m^2 + 5m + 2 an integer, so x2+3xx^2 + 3x is even.
โŒ Check the square. (2m+1)2=(2m+1)(2m+1)=4m2+4m+1(2m + 1)^2 = (2m + 1)(2m + 1) = 4m^2 + 4m + 1; the distributive property produces the middle term 4m4m.
โŒ Check 3x3x. 3(2m+1)=6m+33(2m + 1) = 6m + 3: the 33 multiplies both terms.
โŒ That is half the answer. This is the integer qq that comes next; x2+3xx^2 + 3x itself is twice it.
โŒ Not quite. Expand (2m+1)2+3(2m+1)(2m + 1)^2 + 3(2m + 1) term by term.
โŒ Not quite. That is x2+3xx^2 + 3x itself; qq is what multiplies the 22 after factoring.
โŒ Check the factoring. Every one of the three terms must be divided by 22: 2(2m2+5m+2)=4m2+10m+42(2m^2 + 5m + 2) = 4m^2 + 10m + 4.
โŒ Not quite. Factor 22 out of all of 4m2+10m+44m^2 + 10m + 4.
โŒ Not quite. The hypothesis only says that xx is odd; it says nothing about the new expression 2m2+5m+22m^2 + 5m + 2.
โŒ Not quite. The definition of an odd integer produced x=2m+1x = 2m + 1 in P1P_1; it does not tell us that 2m2+5m+22m^2 + 5m + 2 is an integer.
โŒ Not quite. The distributive property was used to factor out the 22; whether the result is an integer is a separate question about integers.
โŒ Not quite. Which fact says that products and sums of integers are integers?
Show solution

Backward: Q1Q_1 is โ€œthere exists an integer qq such that x2+3x=2qx^2 + 3x = 2qโ€.

Forward: P1P_1: x=2m+1x = 2m + 1. Substituting,

x2+3x=(2m+1)2+3(2m+1)=(4m2+4m+1)+(6m+3)=4m2+10m+4.x^2 + 3x = (2m + 1)^2 + 3(2m + 1) = (4m^2 + 4m + 1) + (6m + 3) = 4m^2 + 10m + 4.

Every term has a factor of 22:

x2+3x=2(2m2+5m+2).x^2 + 3x = 2(2m^2 + 5m + 2).

Since mm is an integer, m2m^2, 2m22m^2 and 5m5m are integers (closure under multiplication) and so is 2m2+5m+22m^2 + 5m + 2 (closure under addition). With q=2m2+5m+2q = 2m^2 + 5m + 2, Q1Q_1 holds, so x2+3xx^2 + 3x is even. Check with m=1m = 1: x=3x = 3, x2+3x=18=2โ‹…9x^2 + 3x = 18 = 2 \cdot 9, and 2+5+2=92 + 5 + 2 = 9.

Problem 4 ยท The Same Method, a New Definition

Given: say an integer aa has form A when a=3k+1a = 3k + 1 for some integer kk. Prove: โ€œIf xx and yy have form A, then xyxy has form A.โ€

The backward question gives Q1Q_1:

With x=3m+1x = 3m + 1 and y=3n+1y = 3n + 1, the integer qq is:

โœ… Correct! xy=9mn+3m+3n+1=3(3mn+m+n)+1xy = 9mn + 3m + 3n + 1 = 3(3mn + m + n) + 1, and 3mn+m+n3mn + m + n is an integer by closure.
โŒ That is a forward step. It comes from the hypothesis (P1P_1 or P2P_2); Q1Q_1 comes from asking when an integer has form A.
โŒ Not quite. That is the target for an odd integer; form A asks for 3q+13q + 1.
โŒ Not quite. Apply the definition of form A to xyxy.
โŒ Not quite. 3(9mn+3m+3n)+1=27mn+9m+9n+13(9mn + 3m + 3n) + 1 = 27mn + 9m + 9n + 1, which is not xyxy: the 33 still has to be factored out.
โŒ Not quite. The +1+1 stays outside: 3(3mn+m+n+1)+13(3mn + m + n + 1) + 1 is 33 more than xyxy.
โŒ Check the first term. Factoring 33 out of 9mn9mn leaves 3mn3mn, not mnmn: 3(mn+m+n)+1=3mn+3m+3n+13(mn + m + n) + 1 = 3mn + 3m + 3n + 1, which is not xyxy.
โŒ Not quite. Expand (3m+1)(3n+1)(3m + 1)(3n + 1) and factor 33 out of every term except the final 11.
Show solution

Backward: โ€œhow do we prove an integer has form A?โ€ By the definition, so Q1Q_1: there exists an integer qq with xy=3q+1xy = 3q + 1.

Forward: by the definition, x=3m+1x = 3m + 1 and y=3n+1y = 3n + 1 for integers mm and nn (two letters, two objects). Then

xy=(3m+1)(3n+1)=9mn+3m+3n+1=3(3mn+m+n)+1.xy = (3m + 1)(3n + 1) = 9mn + 3m + 3n + 1 = 3(3mn + m + n) + 1.

By closure, 3mn+m+n3mn + m + n is an integer, so q=3mn+m+nq = 3mn + m + n gives Q1Q_1, and xyxy has form A. Check: x=4x = 4, y=7y = 7 (m=1m = 1, n=2n = 2) give xy=28=3โ‹…9+1xy = 28 = 3 \cdot 9 + 1, and 3โ‹…2+1+2=93 \cdot 2 + 1 + 2 = 9.

Solved: 0 / 4