Mathematical-Reasoning ยท Unit 2 ยท Video 4 ยท Interactive Practice

Which Way the Arrow Runs: Choosing Answers and Finishing Two Direct Proofs

IKey Formulas

IdeaStatementNote
Backward answer to goal QQA statement Q1Q_1 with Q1โ‡’QQ_1 \Rightarrow QNot Qโ‡’Q1Q \Rightarrow Q_1: y2=4y^2 = 4 does not give y=2y = 2, since (โˆ’2)2=4(-2)^2 = 4
Proving an integer is oddShow it equals 2q+12q + 1 with qq an integer, or show it is a product of two odd integersx2=xโ‹…xx^2 = x \cdot x is odd when xx is odd
mm odd, m=2k+1m = 2k + 13m2+4m+6=2(6k2+10k+6)+13m^2 + 4m + 6 = 2(6k^2 + 10k + 6) + 16k2+10k+66k^2 + 10k + 6 is an integer by closure
Sides mm, m+1m + 1, m+2m + 2m2+(m+1)2=(m+2)2m^2 + (m + 1)^2 = (m + 2)^2 gives (mโˆ’3)(m+1)=0(m - 3)(m + 1) = 0m>0m > 0 rules out m=โˆ’1m = -1, so m=3m = 3

Key Insight: A backward answer must imply the goal. Checking that m=3m = 3 satisfies the equation runs the other way: it shows the case occurs (33, 44, 55 is a right triangle) but does not show that the hypothesis forces m=3m = 3.

IIWhich Way Does the Arrow Run?

A backward answer Q1Q_1 works only if every real yy that makes Q1Q_1 true also makes the goal QQ true.

IIIFrom Six Examples to Every Odd mm

The table suggests that odd mm gives an odd value; substituting m=2k+1m = 2k + 1 proves it for every odd mm.

Step 1 ยท Know โ€” mm is odd, so m=2k+1m = 2k + 1 for some integer kk.

Step 2 ยท Substitute and expand

3m2+4m+6=3(2k+1)2+4(2k+1)+63m^2 + 4m + 6 = 3(2k + 1)^2 + 4(2k + 1) + 6
=(12k2+12k+3)+(8k+4)+6=12k2+20k+13= (12k^2 + 12k + 3) + (8k + 4) + 6 = 12k^2 + 20k + 13

Step 3 ยท Show โ€” split 13=12+113 = 12 + 1 and factor a 22 from the first three terms:

12k2+20k+13=2(6k2+10k+6)+112k^2 + 20k + 13 = 2(6k^2 + 10k + 6) + 1

By closure of the integers, q=6k2+10k+6q = 6k^2 + 10k + 6 is an integer, so 3m2+4m+6=2q+13m^2 + 4m + 6 = 2q + 1 is odd.

IVSides mm, m+1m + 1, m+2m + 2

Legs mm and m+1m + 1 fix the hypotenuse, and it equals m+2m + 2 only where (mโˆ’3)(m+1)=0(m - 3)(m + 1) = 0.

๐Ÿ’ก Substituting m=3m = 3 into m2โˆ’2mโˆ’3=0m^2 - 2m - 3 = 0 only shows m=3โ‡’m = 3 \Rightarrow the equation holds. The proof runs from the hypothesis to m=3m = 3, and it needs the fact that a length is positive to discard m=โˆ’1m = -1.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 ยท Choosing a Backward Answer

Given: yy is a real number and the goal is y2=9y^2 = 9. Which statement is an appropriate answer to the backward question โ€œhow do we prove that the square of a real number equals 99?โ€

โœ… Correct! If y=โˆ’3y = -3, then y2=(โˆ’3)2=9y^2 = (-3)^2 = 9, so y=โˆ’3โ‡’y2=9y = -3 \Rightarrow y^2 = 9: the arrow runs from the answer to the goal. (y=3y = 3 would work too.)
โŒ The arrow is reversed. y2=9y^2 = 9 does give y2โ‰ฅ9y^2 \ge 9, but y=4y = 4 has y2=16โ‰ฅ9y^2 = 16 \ge 9 and y2โ‰ 9y^2 \neq 9, so proving y2โ‰ฅ9y^2 \ge 9 would not establish the goal.
โŒ Not quite. y=4y = 4 satisfies yโ‰ฅ3y \ge 3 while y2=16โ‰ 9y^2 = 16 \neq 9, so yโ‰ฅ3y \ge 3 does not imply the goal.
โŒ The arrow is reversed. Every yy with y2=9y^2 = 9 is nonzero, but y=1y = 1 is nonzero with y2=1y^2 = 1, so yโ‰ 0y \neq 0 does not imply y2=9y^2 = 9.
โŒ Not quite. Look for the statement Q1Q_1 for which Q1โ‡’y2=9Q_1 \Rightarrow y^2 = 9.
Show solution

A backward answer to the goal QQ is a statement Q1Q_1 with Q1โ‡’QQ_1 \Rightarrow Q: whenever Q1Q_1 is true, QQ must be true. Test each option for a real yy that makes it true while y2โ‰ 9y^2 \neq 9:

  • (a) y=4y = 4: y2=16โ‰ฅ9y^2 = 16 \ge 9 but 16โ‰ 916 \neq 9. Fails. (The arrow y2=9โ‡’y2โ‰ฅ9y^2 = 9 \Rightarrow y^2 \ge 9 holds, which is the wrong direction.)
  • (b) y=4y = 4: 4โ‰ฅ34 \ge 3 but 16โ‰ 916 \neq 9. Fails.
  • (c) The only yy with y=โˆ’3y = -3 is โˆ’3-3 itself, and (โˆ’3)2=9(-3)^2 = 9. Works.
  • (d) y=1y = 1: 1โ‰ 01 \neq 0 but 12=1โ‰ 91^2 = 1 \neq 9. Fails.

So proving y=โˆ’3y = -3 (or y=3y = 3) is an appropriate way to prove y2=9y^2 = 9.

Problem 2 ยท The Backward Trap

Given: tt is a real number and the goal is t=5t = 5. Which statement Q1Q_1 satisfies Q1โ‡’t=5Q_1 \Rightarrow t = 5, so that proving it would prove the goal?

โœ… Correct! t2=25t^2 = 25 leaves t=5t = 5 or t=โˆ’5t = -5, and t>0t > 0 removes โˆ’5-5, so this Q1Q_1 forces t=5t = 5.
โŒ That is the backward trap. t=5โ‡’t2=25t = 5 \Rightarrow t^2 = 25, but not the reverse: t=โˆ’5t = -5 has t2=25t^2 = 25 and tโ‰ 5t \neq 5.
โŒ The arrow is reversed. t=5t = 5 gives tโ‰ฅ5t \ge 5, but t=6t = 6 satisfies tโ‰ฅ5t \ge 5 and tโ‰ 5t \neq 5.
โŒ The arrow is reversed. t=5t = 5 gives t2=5tt^2 = 5t, but t=0t = 0 also satisfies t2=5tt^2 = 5t (0=00 = 0) and tโ‰ 5t \neq 5.
โŒ Not quite. The chosen statement must force t=5t = 5.
Show solution

Each of (a), (b), (c) follows from t=5t = 5, so each is a consequence of the goal, not a way to reach it. A single real tt with Q1Q_1 true and tโ‰ 5t \neq 5 shows Q1โ‡’ฬธt=5Q_1 \not\Rightarrow t = 5:

  • (a) t=โˆ’5t = -5: (โˆ’5)2=25(-5)^2 = 25.
  • (b) t=6t = 6: 6โ‰ฅ56 \ge 5.
  • (c) t=0t = 0: 02=0=5โ‹…00^2 = 0 = 5 \cdot 0.

For (d): if t2=25t^2 = 25, then t=5t = 5 or t=โˆ’5t = -5; since also t>0t > 0, t=5t = 5. So (d) โ‡’t=5\Rightarrow t = 5, and proving (d) would prove the goal. The extra condition t>0t > 0 plays the same role as โ€œa length is positiveโ€ in the triangle proof.

Problem 3 ยท Another Odd Expression

Proposition: if mm is an odd integer, then 5m2+2m+45m^2 + 2m + 4 is an odd integer. The proof writes m=2k+1m = 2k + 1 for an integer kk and aims for 5m2+2m+4=2q+15m^2 + 2m + 4 = 2q + 1.

Which q works?

Why is that q an integer?

โœ… Correct! 5m2+2m+4=20k2+24k+11=2(10k2+12k+5)+15m^2 + 2m + 4 = 20k^2 + 24k + 11 = 2(10k^2 + 12k + 5) + 1, and closure makes 10k2+12k+510k^2 + 12k + 5 an integer.
โŒ Close, but that is 2q2q. 20k2+24k+10=2(10k2+12k+5)20k^2 + 24k + 10 = 2(10k^2 + 12k + 5): factor the 22 out before reading off qq.
โŒ Not quite. This qq comes from dropping the 2m=4k+22m = 4k + 2 term: 5(2k+1)2+4=2(10k2+10k+4)+15(2k + 1)^2 + 4 = 2(10k^2 + 10k + 4) + 1.
โŒ Check the constant. 2(10k2+12k+6)+1=20k2+24k+132(10k^2 + 12k + 6) + 1 = 20k^2 + 24k + 13, two more than the expression; split 1111 as 10+110 + 1.
โŒ Not quite. Expand 5(2k+1)2+2(2k+1)+45(2k + 1)^2 + 2(2k + 1) + 4 and write the result as 2(โ€ฆโ€‰)+12(\dots) + 1.
โŒ Not quite. Nothing says kk is odd (m=1m = 1 gives k=0k = 0); the argument needs only that kk is an integer.
โŒ That is circular. Oddness of 5m2+2m+45m^2 + 2m + 4 is what the proof is trying to show, so it cannot be a reason.
โŒ Not quite. Three examples cannot cover every odd mm; the reason must hold for every integer kk.
โŒ Not quite. qq is built from kk by adding and multiplying integers.
Show solution

Know: m=2k+1m = 2k + 1 for some integer kk. Show: 5m2+2m+4=2q+15m^2 + 2m + 4 = 2q + 1 for some integer qq.

5m2+2m+4=5(2k+1)2+2(2k+1)+45m^2 + 2m + 4 = 5(2k + 1)^2 + 2(2k + 1) + 4 =(20k2+20k+5)+(4k+2)+4=20k2+24k+11= (20k^2 + 20k + 5) + (4k + 2) + 4 = 20k^2 + 24k + 11 =(20k2+24k+10)+1=2(10k2+12k+5)+1.= (20k^2 + 24k + 10) + 1 = 2(10k^2 + 12k + 5) + 1.

Since kk is an integer and the integers are closed under multiplication and addition, q=10k2+12k+5q = 10k^2 + 12k + 5 is an integer. Hence 5m2+2m+45m^2 + 2m + 4 is odd.

Spot check: m=1m = 1 gives k=0k = 0, q=5q = 5, and 5+2+4=11=2(5)+15 + 2 + 4 = 11 = 2(5) + 1.

Problem 4 ยท Another Right Triangle

Proposition: if mm is a real number and mm, m+7m + 7 and m+8m + 8 are the lengths of the three sides of a right triangle, then m=5m = 5.

Which standard-form equation does the Pythagorean Theorem give?

How does the proof finish?

โœ… Correct! The equation narrows mm to 55 or โˆ’3-3, and positivity of a length removes โˆ’3-3; the sides are 55, 1212, 1313.
โŒ Check the hypotenuse. This uses m+7m + 7 as the hypotenuse, but the hypotenuse is the longest side, m+8m + 8.
โŒ Check the expansion. (m+7)2=m2+14m+49(m + 7)^2 = m^2 + 14m + 49, not m2+49m^2 + 49.
โŒ Check the sign of the mm-term. Collecting on the left gives 14mโˆ’16m=โˆ’2m14m - 16m = -2m.
โŒ Not quite. Expand m2+(m+7)2=(m+8)2m^2 + (m + 7)^2 = (m + 8)^2 and move every term to the left.
โŒ Not quite. Part of the hypothesis is unused: mm is a side length, so m>0m > 0, and m=โˆ’3m = -3 is impossible.
โŒ That arrow points the wrong way. The check shows m=5โ‡’m = 5 \Rightarrow the equation holds, so the case occurs; it does not show that the hypothesis forces m=5m = 5.
โŒ Not quite. The hypothesis says only that mm is real, and โˆ’3-3 is an integer anyway; positivity of a length is what rules out โˆ’3-3.
โŒ Not quite. Use every part of the hypothesis to choose between the two roots.
Show solution

Assume mm is real and mm, m+7m + 7, m+8m + 8 are the sides of a right triangle. The hypotenuse is the longest side, m+8m + 8, so by the Pythagorean Theorem

m2+(m+7)2=(m+8)2m^2 + (m + 7)^2 = (m + 8)^2 m2+(m2+14m+49)=m2+16m+64m^2 + (m^2 + 14m + 49) = m^2 + 16m + 64 2m2+14m+49=m2+16m+642m^2 + 14m + 49 = m^2 + 16m + 64 m2โˆ’2mโˆ’15=0so(mโˆ’5)(m+3)=0.m^2 - 2m - 15 = 0 \quad\text{so}\quad (m - 5)(m + 3) = 0.

Hence m=5m = 5 or m=โˆ’3m = -3. Since mm is the length of a side, m>0m > 0, which rules out โˆ’3-3. Therefore m=5m = 5. โˆŽ

The check 52+122=25+144=169=1325^2 + 12^2 = 25 + 144 = 169 = 13^2 confirms only that the case really occurs; the proof is the argument above.

Solved: 0 / 4