Mathematical-Reasoning · Unit 7 · Video 3 · Interactive Practice

Proving Biconditionals: Two Conditionals, Each Marked

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameWhat it tells you
(P↔Q)≡(P→Q)∧(Q→P)(P \leftrightarrow Q) \equiv (P \to Q) \wedge (Q \to P)Biconditional as two conditionalsProve P↔QP \leftrightarrow Q by proving both P→QP \to Q and Q→PQ \to P
PP only if QQ   ≡  \;\equiv\; P→QP \to QThe "only if" partPP cannot hold without QQ
PP if QQ   ≡  \;\equiv\; Q→PQ \to PThe "if" partQQ is enough to guarantee PP
"For the first part, we assume …" / "This completes the first part."Part markersWhere each part begins and ends, and which assumption is in force

Key Insight: Each part is an ordinary conditional statement, so each may use its own method: a direct proof, a proof by contrapositive, or a citation of a theorem already proved.

IIVisualization 1 — Which Direction Does the Sentence Say?

"PP if QQ" and "PP only if QQ" point in opposite directions between the same two statements.

IIIVisualization 2 — What Does Each Direction Prove About the Solutions?

For real xx, substitution and factoring each prove one half of x=2  ⟺  x3−2x2+x=2x = 2 \iff x^3 - 2x^2 + x = 2.

💡 Part 2 needs x∈Rx \in \mathbb{R}: over C\mathbb{C}, x=ix = i gives i3−2i2+i=−i+2+i=2i^3 - 2i^2 + i = -i + 2 + i = 2, so the equation has solutions other than 22.

IVVisualization 3 — Writing the Proof With Each Part Marked

For each integer nn: nn is even   ⟺  \iff n2n^2 is even, written as two marked parts.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 · Name the "If" Part

Given: For each integer nn, nn is even if and only if n2n^2 is even. Let PP be "nn is even" and QQ be "n2n^2 is even". Which statement is the "if" part?

✅ Correct! "PP if QQ" says QQ is enough for PP, which is Q→PQ \to P: if n2n^2 is even, then nn is even.
❌ That is the other direction. P→QP \to Q is "PP only if QQ", the "only if" part.
❌ Not quite. P∧QP \wedge Q is a conjunction, not a conditional; it is false for n=3n = 3, while each part of the biconditional is a conditional statement.
❌ Not quite. The "if" part has hypothesis QQ and conclusion PP; this option changes the conclusion to "not PP".
Show solution

Split P↔QP \leftrightarrow Q into its two conditionals:

P↔Q  ≡  (P→Q)∧(Q→P).P \leftrightarrow Q \;\equiv\; (P \to Q) \wedge (Q \to P).

"PP if QQ" means QQ guarantees PP, so it is Q→PQ \to P: if n2n^2 is even, then nn is even. This is the if part.

"PP only if QQ" means PP cannot hold without QQ, so it is P→QP \to Q: if nn is even, then n2n^2 is even. This is the only if part.

Problem 2 · A Proof That Stops Halfway

Given: A student "proves" that for real xx, x=2  ⟺  x3−2x2+x=2x = 2 \iff x^3 - 2x^2 + x = 2, by writing: "Assume x=2x = 2. Then 23−2⋅22+2=8−8+2=22^3 - 2 \cdot 2^2 + 2 = 8 - 8 + 2 = 2, so the equation holds. Therefore x=2x = 2 if and only if x3−2x2+x=2x^3 - 2x^2 + x = 2." What is wrong?

✅ Correct! Substitution proves x=2⇒x = 2 \Rightarrow equation, so 22 is a solution. It leaves room for other solutions.
❌ Check the direction. The student assumed x=2x = 2 and concluded the equation: that is P→QP \to Q, "x=2x = 2 only if the equation holds".
❌ Not quite. Substitution shows 22 is a solution, but not that no other real number is. That needs the converse.
❌ The arithmetic is fine. 8−8+2=28 - 8 + 2 = 2. The problem is which conditional was proved.
Show solution

Let PP be "x=2x = 2" and QQ be "x3−2x2+x=2x^3 - 2x^2 + x = 2". The student assumed PP and derived QQ, which proves P→QP \to Q, the only if part.

The if part, Q→PQ \to P, is never proved: assume x3−2x2+x=2x^3 - 2x^2 + x = 2 and show x=2x = 2. That requires solving:

x3−2x2+x−2=x2(x−2)+(x−2)=(x−2)(x2+1)=0,x^3 - 2x^2 + x - 2 = x^2(x - 2) + (x - 2) = (x - 2)(x^2 + 1) = 0,

and since x2+1≥1x^2 + 1 \ge 1 for real xx, the factor x−2x - 2 must be 00. Only with both parts is the biconditional proved, and the write-up should mark where each part begins and ends.

Problem 3 · The Second Part by Factoring

Given: For real xx, prove x=3  ⟺  x3−3x2+4x=12x = 3 \iff x^3 - 3x^2 + 4x = 12. In the second part, assume x3−3x2+4x=12x^3 - 3x^2 + 4x = 12 and subtract 1212 from both sides.

Factoring by grouping gives which equation?

Why does that equation force x=3x = 3?

✅ Correct! (x−3)(x2+4)=0(x - 3)(x^2 + 4) = 0 and x2+4≥4x^2 + 4 \ge 4, so x=3x = 3: every real solution is 33.
❌ Check the grouping. x3−3x2=x2(x−3)x^3 - 3x^2 = x^2(x - 3) and 4x−12=4(x−3)4x - 12 = 4(x - 3); expand your choice to test it.
❌ Not quite. A product is 00 only if a factor is 00, so rule out the factor x2+4x^2 + 4.
❌ Check the signs. (x−3)(x2−4)(x - 3)(x^2 - 4) expands to x3−3x2−4x+12x^3 - 3x^2 - 4x + 12; the second group is 4x−12=4(x−3)4x - 12 = 4(x - 3), so the factor is x2+4x^2 + 4.
❌ Check the signs. (x+3)(x2−4)(x + 3)(x^2 - 4) expands to x3+3x2−4x−12x^3 + 3x^2 - 4x - 12; grouping gives x2(x−3)+4(x−3)x^2(x - 3) + 4(x - 3), with the common factor x−3x - 3.
❌ Check the common factor. (x+3)(x2+4)(x + 3)(x^2 + 4) expands to x3+3x2+4x+12x^3 + 3x^2 + 4x + 12; since x3−3x2=x2(x−3)x^3 - 3x^2 = x^2(x - 3), the common factor is x−3x - 3, not x+3x + 3.
❌ Not allowed here. Dividing by x−3x - 3 assumes x−3≠0x - 3 \neq 0, which is exactly what is unknown, and it leads to x2+4=0x^2 + 4 = 0, which no real number satisfies.
❌ Check that equation. (±2)2+4=8(\pm 2)^2 + 4 = 8; for real xx, x2+4=0x^2 + 4 = 0 has no solution at all, because x2≥0x^2 \ge 0.
❌ That is the first part. Substituting 33 shows 33 is a solution; it does not show that no other real number is.
Show solution

We prove two conditional statements: if x=3x = 3, then x3−3x2+4x=12x^3 - 3x^2 + 4x = 12; and if x3−3x2+4x=12x^3 - 3x^2 + 4x = 12, then x=3x = 3.

First part. Assume x=3x = 3. Then 33−3⋅32+4⋅3=27−27+12=123^3 - 3 \cdot 3^2 + 4 \cdot 3 = 27 - 27 + 12 = 12. This completes the first part.

Second part. Assume x3−3x2+4x=12x^3 - 3x^2 + 4x = 12. Then

x3−3x2+4x−12=0x^3 - 3x^2 + 4x - 12 = 0 x2(x−3)+4(x−3)=0x^2(x - 3) + 4(x - 3) = 0 (x−3)(x2+4)=0.(x - 3)(x^2 + 4) = 0.

If a product of two real numbers is 00, one factor is 00. Since x2≥0x^2 \ge 0, we have x2+4≥4x^2 + 4 \ge 4, so x2+4≠0x^2 + 4 \neq 0. Hence x−3=0x - 3 = 0 and x=3x = 3. This completes the second part.

Both conditional statements are proved, so the biconditional is proved. Dividing by x−3x - 3 (option d) is not allowed when x−3x - 3 might be 00, and it throws away exactly the solution x=3x = 3.

Problem 4 · Test Each Part Separately

Given: The statement "For each real number xx, x=2x = 2 if and only if x2−2x=0x^2 - 2x = 0." Which description is correct?

✅ Correct! x=0x = 0 satisfies x2−2x=0x^2 - 2x = 0 but is not 22, so the "if" part fails and the biconditional is false.
❌ Directions swapped. The "only if" part is x=2⇒x2−2x=0x = 2 \Rightarrow x^2 - 2x = 0, which is true: 4−4=04 - 4 = 0.
❌ Not quite. Factor: x2−2x=x(x−2)x^2 - 2x = x(x - 2), so the equation has a second solution.
❌ Check the hypothesis. For x=−2x = -2, x2−2x=4+4=8≠0x^2 - 2x = 4 + 4 = 8 \neq 0, so the hypothesis is false and x=−2x = -2 is not a counterexample.
Show solution

Let PP be "x=2x = 2" and QQ be "x2−2x=0x^2 - 2x = 0". Test each part on its own.

Only if part, P→QP \to Q: if x=2x = 2, then x2−2x=4−4=0x^2 - 2x = 4 - 4 = 0. True.

If part, Q→PQ \to P: x2−2x=x(x−2)=0x^2 - 2x = x(x - 2) = 0 gives x=0x = 0 or x=2x = 2. For x=0x = 0 the hypothesis QQ is true and the conclusion PP is false, so x=0x = 0 is a counterexample.

Since (P↔Q)≡(P→Q)∧(Q→P)(P \leftrightarrow Q) \equiv (P \to Q) \wedge (Q \to P) and Q→PQ \to P fails, the biconditional is false.

Solved: 0 / 4