Mathematical-Reasoning · Unit 9 · Video 4 · Interactive Practice
| Statement | Name | Cases split on |
|---|---|---|
| For : | Part (1) | The sign of : or (2 cases) |
| Part (2) | The signs of and together (4 cases) | |
| and for every real | Fact | The sign of (2 cases); used with and |
| Part (3), the Triangle Inequality | The sign of (2 cases) |
Key Insight: The definition for and for needs the sign of whatever is inside the bars, so the inside sets the split; since , proving each case separately proves the statement, provided the cases cover every possibility.
For , the statements and are true for exactly the same .
In each case the Fact bounds by , and the gap shows which Fact inequality is strict.
needs only the sign of , two cases; is handled by the signs of and , four cases.
Problem 1 · Which Case, Which Values
Given: and . Which case of the Triangle Inequality proof applies, and what does it give?
The proof splits on the sign of the quantity inside the bars on the left, . Since , this is Case 1, and .
On the right, .
The Fact gives , that is , and , that is . Adding them gives , that is . So .
Problem 2 · Choosing the Split
Given: A proof of for all real and . Which choice of cases covers every pair and lets be written without bars inside each case?
To remove the bars from , the definition of absolute value needs the sign of . The split or covers every real number , so it covers every pair , and it gives in the first case and in the second.
Splitting on alone does not fix the sign of . Using strict inequalities on both sides drops . The four sign cases on and settle the sign of only when and do not have opposite signs; the two mixed cases would each need a further split on .
Problem 3 · Finishing Case 2
Given: In Case 2 () the proof has . Which two inequalities from the Fact, added together, finish this case?
Assume . Then .
The Fact, with and with , gives and . Adding these two inequalities:
The left side equals , so in Case 2. The inequalities and are the ones Case 1 uses, where .
Problem 4 · When Is It an Equality?
Given: Real numbers and . For exactly which pairs does hold?
Use the same two cases as the proof and look at the gap .
Case 1: . Then , so the gap is . By the Fact both terms are , so the gap is exactly when and . Now holds when and fails when (then ), so the gap is exactly when and .
Case 2: . Then , so the gap is , again a sum of two terms that are . It is exactly when and , that is, when and .
So equality holds exactly when and , or and (both numbers forces Case 1; both with forces , which is also covered). That is exactly the condition .
Solved: 0 / 4