Multivariable-Calculus ยท Unit 11 ยท Video 2 ยท Interactive Practice

One Normal Vector, One Tangent Plane: The Gradient on a Hyperboloid

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameAt P=(2,1,1)P = (2, 1, 1) on x2+y2โˆ’z2=4x^2 + y^2 - z^2 = 4
โˆ‡w(P)โŠฅ{โ€‰w=cโ€‰}\nabla w(P) \perp \{\, w = c \,\} at PPGradient is normal to the level surfaceโˆ‡w=โŸจ2x,2y,โˆ’2zโŸฉ\nabla w = \langle 2x, 2y, -2z \rangle, so โˆ‡w(P)=โŸจ4,2,โˆ’2โŸฉ\nabla w(P) = \langle 4, 2, -2 \rangle
โˆ‡w(P)โ‹…โŸจx,y,zโŸฉ=โˆ‡w(P)โ‹…โŸจx0,y0,z0โŸฉ\nabla w(P) \cdot \langle x, y, z \rangle = \nabla w(P) \cdot \langle x_0, y_0, z_0 \rangleTangent plane (gradient route)4x+2yโˆ’2z=84x + 2y - 2z = 8
ฮ”wโ‰ˆwxโ€‰ฮ”x+wyโ€‰ฮ”y+wzโ€‰ฮ”z\Delta w \approx w_x\,\Delta x + w_y\,\Delta y + w_z\,\Delta zLinear approximationฮ”wโ‰ˆ4โ€‰ฮ”x+2โ€‰ฮ”yโˆ’2โ€‰ฮ”z\Delta w \approx 4\,\Delta x + 2\,\Delta y - 2\,\Delta z
wx(P)โ€‰ฮ”x+wy(P)โ€‰ฮ”y+wz(P)โ€‰ฮ”z=0w_x(P)\,\Delta x + w_y(P)\,\Delta y + w_z(P)\,\Delta z = 0Tangent plane (differential route)4(xโˆ’2)+2(yโˆ’1)โˆ’2(zโˆ’1)=04(x - 2) + 2(y - 1) - 2(z - 1) = 0

Key Insight: The coefficients 4,2,โˆ’24, 2, -2 of dw=4โ€‰dx+2โ€‰dyโˆ’2โ€‰dzdw = 4\,dx + 2\,dy - 2\,dz are exactly the components of โˆ‡w(2,1,1)\nabla w(2,1,1) โ€” both routes use the same three numbers and the same point, so they give the same plane.

IIVisualization 1 โ€” The Gradient as a Normal Vector

At every point of the level surface w=x2+y2โˆ’z2=4w = x^2 + y^2 - z^2 = 4, โˆ‡w\nabla w is normal to the surface and fixes its tangent plane.

๐Ÿ’ก The plane meets this surface along two straight lines through PP โ€” at (2,1,1)(2, 1, 1) they are (2,1,1)+tโŸจ0,1,1โŸฉ(2,1,1) + t\langle 0, 1, 1 \rangle and (2,1,1)+tโŸจ4,โˆ’3,5โŸฉ(2,1,1) + t\langle 4, -3, 5 \rangle โ€” so near PP the surface lies above the plane in two opposite sectors and below it in the other two, like a saddle.

IIIVisualization 2 โ€” Zooming In: the Linear Part Vanishes on the Plane

Along the tangent plane the linear part of ฮ”w\Delta w is exactly zero; the true ฮ”w\Delta w at distance ss shrinks like s2s^2.

๐Ÿ’ก ฮ”w<0\Delta w < 0 along the y=1y = 1 slice but ฮ”w>0\Delta w > 0 along the z=1z = 1 slice: the tangent plane leaves the surface on opposite sides in different directions, and along x=2x = 2 it never leaves at all.

IVQuiz Questions

Problem 1 ยท Tangent Plane from the Gradient

Given: the level surface x2+3y+z2=11x^2 + 3y + z^2 = 11 and the point P=(1,2,2)P = (1, 2, 2) on it โ€” find the tangent plane at PP.

โœ… Correct! The normal is โˆ‡w(1,2,2)=โŸจ2,3,4โŸฉ\nabla w(1,2,2) = \langle 2, 3, 4 \rangle, and plugging in PP fixes the constant: 2+6+8=162 + 6 + 8 = 16.
โŒ Not quite. The right-hand side is not the level value 1111; it comes from plugging PP into 2x+3y+4z2x + 3y + 4z. Check: 2(1)+3(2)+4(2)=16โ‰ 112(1) + 3(2) + 4(2) = 16 \ne 11, so your plane misses PP.
โŒ Not quite. That plane passes through the origin, not through PP. The tangent plane must contain PP: plug it in to fix the constant.
โŒ Not quite. You used the point โŸจ1,2,2โŸฉ\langle 1, 2, 2 \rangle as the normal vector. The normal is the gradient at the point, โˆ‡w(P)=โŸจ2x,3,2zโŸฉโˆฃP\nabla w(P) = \langle 2x, 3, 2z \rangle\big|_P.
โŒ Not quite. Compute โˆ‡w\nabla w, evaluate it at PP, then plug PP into the plane.
Show solution

Write the surface as the level set w=11w = 11 of w=x2+3y+z2w = x^2 + 3y + z^2; PP is on it since 1+6+4=111 + 6 + 4 = 11.

โˆ‡w=โŸจ2x,ย 3,ย 2zโŸฉ,โˆ‡w(1,2,2)=โŸจ2,3,4โŸฉ\nabla w = \langle 2x,\ 3,\ 2z \rangle, \qquad \nabla w(1,2,2) = \langle 2, 3, 4 \rangle

A plane with normal โŸจ2,3,4โŸฉ\langle 2, 3, 4 \rangle is 2x+3y+4z=const2x + 3y + 4z = \text{const}. Plug in PP:

2(1)+3(2)+4(2)=16โŸน2x+3y+4z=162(1) + 3(2) + 4(2) = 16 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad 2x + 3y + 4z = 16

The level value 1111 never appears in the plane's equation: it only told us which level surface we were on.

Problem 2 ยท Watch the Sign of โˆ’2z-2z

Given: the hyperboloid x2+y2โˆ’z2=4x^2 + y^2 - z^2 = 4 and the point P=(1,2,โˆ’1)P = (1, 2, -1) on it โ€” find the tangent plane at PP.

โœ… Correct! โˆ‡w(1,2,โˆ’1)=โŸจ2,4,2โŸฉ\nabla w(1,2,-1) = \langle 2, 4, 2 \rangle โ€” the third component is โˆ’2(โˆ’1)=+2-2(-1) = +2 โ€” and 2+8โˆ’2=82 + 8 - 2 = 8 gives x+2y+z=4x + 2y + z = 4.
โŒ Close, but check the sign. This plane does contain PP, but its normal โŸจ1,2,โˆ’1โŸฉ\langle 1, 2, -1 \rangle is the gradient direction at (1,2,1)(1, 2, 1). At z=โˆ’1z = -1, the component โˆ’2z-2z equals +2+2.
โŒ Close โ€” right normal, wrong constant. Plug the actual zz-coordinate โˆ’1-1: 1+2(2)+(โˆ’1)=41 + 2(2) + (-1) = 4, not 66. Your plane misses PP.
โŒ Not quite. Evaluate โˆ‡w=โŸจ2x,2y,โˆ’2zโŸฉ\nabla w = \langle 2x, 2y, -2z \rangle at (1,2,โˆ’1)(1, 2, -1) carefully, then plug PP in.
Show solution

PP is on the surface: 1+4โˆ’1=41 + 4 - 1 = 4. With w=x2+y2โˆ’z2w = x^2 + y^2 - z^2:

โˆ‡w(1,2,โˆ’1)=โŸจ2(1),ย 2(2),ย โˆ’2(โˆ’1)โŸฉ=โŸจ2,4,2โŸฉ\nabla w(1, 2, -1) = \langle 2(1),\ 2(2),\ -2(-1) \rangle = \langle 2, 4, 2 \rangle 2x+4y+2z=2(1)+4(2)+2(โˆ’1)=82x + 4y + 2z = 2(1) + 4(2) + 2(-1) = 8

Dividing by 22: x+2y+z=4x + 2y + z = 4.

Common mistakes: copying โˆ’2-2 for the third component from the video's point (2,1,1)(2, 1, 1) (there z=1z = 1), or plugging z=+1z = +1 when fixing the constant.

Problem 3 ยท The Differential Route

Given: w=x2+y2โˆ’z2w = x^2 + y^2 - z^2 near P=(2,1,1)P = (2, 1, 1), where w(P)=4w(P) = 4 โ€” find the linear approximation of ฮ”w\Delta w for the move (ฮ”x,ฮ”y,ฮ”z)=(0.1,โˆ’0.1,0.2)(\Delta x, \Delta y, \Delta z) = (0.1, -0.1, 0.2), and the ฮ”z\Delta z that puts (2.1,ย 0.9,ย 1+ฮ”z)(2.1,\ 0.9,\ 1 + \Delta z) on the tangent plane.

Linear approximation of ฮ”w\Delta w for (0.1,โˆ’0.1,0.2)(0.1, -0.1, 0.2)?

Which ฮ”z\Delta z puts (2.1,ย 0.9,ย 1+ฮ”z)(2.1,\ 0.9,\ 1 + \Delta z) on the tangent plane?

โœ… Correct! The linear part is โˆ’0.2-0.2; setting it exactly to zero gives ฮ”z=0.1\Delta z = 0.1, and indeed w(2.1,0.9,1.1)=4.01w(2.1, 0.9, 1.1) = 4.01 โ€” almost on the surface.
โŒ Check the sign of the zz-term. The coefficient is โˆ’2-2, so the zz-term is โˆ’2(0.2)=โˆ’0.4-2(0.2) = -0.4, not +0.4+0.4.
โŒ That is the exact change. w(2.1,0.9,1.2)โˆ’4=โˆ’0.22w(2.1, 0.9, 1.2) - 4 = -0.22; the linear approximation keeps only 4โ€‰ฮ”x+2โ€‰ฮ”yโˆ’2โ€‰ฮ”z4\,\Delta x + 2\,\Delta y - 2\,\Delta z.
โŒ Not quite. Substitute into 4โ€‰ฮ”x+2โ€‰ฮ”yโˆ’2โ€‰ฮ”z4\,\Delta x + 2\,\Delta y - 2\,\Delta z term by term.
โŒ Check ฮ”z\Delta z. The tangent plane is 4โ€‰ฮ”x+2โ€‰ฮ”yโˆ’2โ€‰ฮ”z=04\,\Delta x + 2\,\Delta y - 2\,\Delta z = 0 exactly; with ฮ”x=0.1\Delta x = 0.1, ฮ”y=โˆ’0.1\Delta y = -0.1 solve for ฮ”z\Delta z.
Show solution

Step 1: Linear approximation. At PP, โˆ‡w=โŸจ4,2,โˆ’2โŸฉ\nabla w = \langle 4, 2, -2 \rangle, so

ฮ”wโ‰ˆ4(0.1)+2(โˆ’0.1)โˆ’2(0.2)=0.4โˆ’0.2โˆ’0.4=โˆ’0.2\Delta w \approx 4(0.1) + 2(-0.1) - 2(0.2) = 0.4 - 0.2 - 0.4 = -0.2

(The exact change is 4.41+0.81โˆ’1.44โˆ’4=โˆ’0.224.41 + 0.81 - 1.44 - 4 = -0.22; the difference is the second-order part.)

Step 2: Tangent plane. Set the linear formula exactly to zero:

4(0.1)+2(โˆ’0.1)โˆ’2โ€‰ฮ”z=0โŸน0.2=2โ€‰ฮ”zโŸนฮ”z=0.14(0.1) + 2(-0.1) - 2\,\Delta z = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad 0.2 = 2\,\Delta z \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \Delta z = 0.1

Check: 4(2.1)+2(0.9)โˆ’2(1.1)=8.4+1.8โˆ’2.2=84(2.1) + 2(0.9) - 2(1.1) = 8.4 + 1.8 - 2.2 = 8 โœ“, and w(2.1,0.9,1.1)=4.41+0.81โˆ’1.21=4.01โ‰ˆ4w(2.1, 0.9, 1.1) = 4.41 + 0.81 - 1.21 = 4.01 \approx 4.

Problem 4 ยท Every Point at Once

Given: any point P0=(x0,y0,z0)P_0 = (x_0, y_0, z_0) on x2+y2โˆ’z2=4x^2 + y^2 - z^2 = 4. Its tangent plane can be written x0โ€‰x+y0โ€‰yโˆ’z0โ€‰z=cx_0\,x + y_0\,y - z_0\,z = c โ€” find cc.

โœ… Correct! Plugging P0P_0 in gives x02+y02โˆ’z02x_0^2 + y_0^2 - z_0^2, which is 44 because P0P_0 is on the surface. At (2,1,1)(2, 1, 1): 2x+yโˆ’z=42x + y - z = 4, the video's plane divided by 22.
โŒ Not quite. c=0c = 0 is a plane through the origin, and no point of this surface is the origin (0โ‰ 40 \ne 4), so it cannot contain P0P_0.
โŒ Close. 88 is the constant for the normal โŸจ2x0,2y0,โˆ’2z0โŸฉ\langle 2x_0, 2y_0, -2z_0 \rangle; the equation here has already been divided by 22.
โŒ Watch the sign. Plugging P0P_0 into x0โ€‰x+y0โ€‰yโˆ’z0โ€‰zx_0\,x + y_0\,y - z_0\,z gives x02+y02โˆ’z02x_0^2 + y_0^2 - z_0^2, with a minus on the zz-term โ€” and that has a fixed value on this surface.
โŒ Not quite. Plug P0P_0 itself into the plane and use the surface equation.
Show solution

โˆ‡w(P0)=โŸจ2x0,2y0,โˆ’2z0โŸฉ\nabla w(P_0) = \langle 2x_0, 2y_0, -2z_0 \rangle, so the plane is 2x0โ€‰x+2y0โ€‰yโˆ’2z0โ€‰z=const2x_0\,x + 2y_0\,y - 2z_0\,z = \text{const}. Plug in P0P_0:

const=2x02+2y02โˆ’2z02=2โ€‰(x02+y02โˆ’z02)=2โ‹…4=8\text{const} = 2x_0^2 + 2y_0^2 - 2z_0^2 = 2\,(x_0^2 + y_0^2 - z_0^2) = 2 \cdot 4 = 8

Divide by 22: x0โ€‰x+y0โ€‰yโˆ’z0โ€‰z=4x_0\,x + y_0\,y - z_0\,z = 4, so c=4c = 4 at every point of the surface.

Check at (2,1,1)(2, 1, 1): 2x+yโˆ’z=42x + y - z = 4, which is 4x+2yโˆ’2z=84x + 2y - 2z = 8 divided by 22 โœ“.

Solved: 0 / 4