Multivariable-Calculus ยท Unit 18 ยท Video 4 ยท Interactive Practice

Conservative Fields: Four Equivalent Properties

IKey Formulas

StatementPropertyMeaning
โˆฎCFโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—=0\oint_C \vec F \cdot d\vec r = 0 for every closed CC(1) ConservativeNo net work around any loop
โˆซC1Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—=โˆซC2Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—\int_{C_1} \vec F \cdot d\vec r = \int_{C_2} \vec F \cdot d\vec r(2) Path independentSame endpoints, same work
Fโƒ—=โˆ‡f=fxโ€‰ฤฑ^+fyโ€‰ศท^\vec F = \nabla f = f_x\,\hat\imath + f_y\,\hat\jmath(3) Gradient fieldM=fxM = f_x, N=fyN = f_y
Mโ€‰dx+Nโ€‰dy=dfM\,dx + N\,dy = df(4) Exact differential(3) written in differential notation

Key Insight: โˆฎC1โˆ’C2=โˆซC1โˆ’โˆซC2\oint_{C_1 - C_2} = \int_{C_1} - \int_{C_2} links (1) and (2), and f(x,y)=โˆซ(0,0)(x,y)Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—f(x, y) = \int_{(0,0)}^{(x,y)} \vec F \cdot d\vec r builds the potential from path independence.

IITwo Paths Make a Loop

Out along C1C_1 and back along C2C_2 reversed is the closed curve C1โˆ’C2C_1 - C_2, with work โˆซC1โˆ’โˆซC2\int_{C_1} - \int_{C_2}.

IIIThe Potential as Work from the Origin

f(x,y)f(x, y) is the work from (0,0)(0, 0) to (x,y)(x, y); it is well defined only if every route gives the same number.

IVQuiz Questions

Problem 1 ยท Kinetic Energy from the Potential

Given: the only force on a particle is Fโƒ—=โˆ‡f\vec F = \nabla f with f=x2+y2f = x^2 + y^2 (our plus sign), and the particle moves from (1,0)(1, 0) to (0,2)(0, 2) โ€” find the change in its kinetic energy.

โœ… Correct! Change in kinetic energy = work = f(0,2)โˆ’f(1,0)=4โˆ’1=3f(0, 2) - f(1, 0) = 4 - 1 = 3.
โŒ The order is reversed. Work is f(P1)โˆ’f(P0)f(P_1) - f(P_0), end minus start.
โŒ That adds the two values of ff. The kinetic energy changes by the difference.
โŒ For a gradient field it does not. The work, and so the change in kinetic energy, is f(P1)โˆ’f(P0)f(P_1) - f(P_0) on every path.
Show solution

The change in kinetic energy equals the work done by the force. For a gradient field the work is the change in the potential:

ฮ”(KE)=โˆซCโˆ‡fโ‹…drโƒ—=f(0,2)โˆ’f(1,0)=4โˆ’1=3.\Delta(\text{KE}) = \int_C \nabla f \cdot d\vec r = f(0, 2) - f(1, 0) = 4 - 1 = 3.

Problem 2 ยท Two Paths, Two Answers

Given: two curves C1C_1, C2C_2 from PP to QQ with โˆซC1Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—=7\int_{C_1} \vec F \cdot d\vec r = 7 and โˆซC2Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—=4\int_{C_2} \vec F \cdot d\vec r = 4 โ€” find โˆฎC1โˆ’C2Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—\oint_{C_1 - C_2} \vec F \cdot d\vec r and what it shows.

โœ… Correct! 7โˆ’4=3โ‰ 07 - 4 = 3 \ne 0: one loop with nonzero work, so all four properties fail.
โŒ C2C_2 is traversed backwards. Reversing it flips the sign of its work: 7โˆ’47 - 4, not 7+47 + 4.
โŒ A gradient field is path independent. Different work on two paths with the same endpoints rules a gradient out.
โŒ That holds only for conservative fields. Here the loop work is โˆซC1โˆ’โˆซC2=3\int_{C_1} - \int_{C_2} = 3.
Show solution

The closed curve C1โˆ’C2C_1 - C_2 runs out along C1C_1 and back along C2C_2 reversed, so

โˆฎC1โˆ’C2Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—=โˆซC1Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—โˆ’โˆซC2Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—=7โˆ’4=3.\oint_{C_1 - C_2} \vec F \cdot d\vec r = \int_{C_1} \vec F \cdot d\vec r - \int_{C_2} \vec F \cdot d\vec r = 7 - 4 = 3.

A loop with nonzero work means Fโƒ—\vec F is not conservative; by the equivalence it is not path independent, not a gradient, and Mโ€‰dx+Nโ€‰dyM\,dx + N\,dy is not exact.

Problem 3 ยท Building the Potential

Given: Fโƒ—=(2x+y)โ€‰ฤฑ^+xโ€‰ศท^\vec F = (2x + y)\,\hat\imath + x\,\hat\jmath is a gradient field and f(0,0)=0f(0, 0) = 0 โ€” find f(2,3)f(2, 3) as the work from (0,0)(0, 0) to (2,3)(2, 3), going along the xx-axis to (2,0)(2, 0) and then straight up.

โœ… Correct! 4+6=104 + 6 = 10, and indeed f=x2+xyf = x^2 + xy gives f(2,3)=10f(2, 3) = 10.
โŒ That is only the horizontal leg. The vertical leg adds โˆซ03N(2,y)โ€‰dy=โˆซ032โ€‰dy=6\int_0^3 N(2, y)\,dy = \int_0^3 2\,dy = 6.
โŒ That is only the vertical leg. The horizontal leg adds โˆซ022xโ€‰dx=4\int_0^2 2x\,dx = 4.
โŒ On the vertical leg only NN counts. There dx=0dx = 0, so the integrand is Nโ€‰dy=2โ€‰dyN\,dy = 2\,dy, giving 66, not 99.
Show solution

Horizontal leg (0,0)โ†’(2,0)(0, 0) \to (2, 0): y=0y = 0, dy=0dy = 0, so Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—=2xโ€‰dx\vec F \cdot d\vec r = 2x\,dx and โˆซ022xโ€‰dx=4\int_0^2 2x\,dx = 4.

Vertical leg (2,0)โ†’(2,3)(2, 0) \to (2, 3): x=2x = 2, dx=0dx = 0, so Fโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—=2โ€‰dy\vec F \cdot d\vec r = 2\,dy and โˆซ032โ€‰dy=6\int_0^3 2\,dy = 6.

f(2,3)=4+6=10.f(2, 3) = 4 + 6 = 10.

Check: f=x2+xyf = x^2 + xy has fx=2x+yf_x = 2x + y, fy=xf_y = x, and f(2,3)=4+6=10f(2, 3) = 4 + 6 = 10.

Problem 4 ยท The Physicists' Sign

Given: in the physics convention Fโƒ—=โˆ’โˆ‡ฯ†\vec F = -\nabla \varphi, where ฯ†\varphi is the potential energy; a particle moves from P0P_0 with ฯ†=5\varphi = 5 to P1P_1 with ฯ†=2\varphi = 2 โ€” find the work done by Fโƒ—\vec F and the change in kinetic energy.

โœ… Correct! Work =ฯ†(P0)โˆ’ฯ†(P1)=3= \varphi(P_0) - \varphi(P_1) = 3: potential energy lost is kinetic energy gained.
โŒ That uses our plus sign. With Fโƒ—=โˆ’โˆ‡ฯ†\vec F = -\nabla\varphi the work is โˆ’(ฯ†(P1)โˆ’ฯ†(P0))=3-(\varphi(P_1) - \varphi(P_0)) = 3.
โŒ The work and the kinetic energy change agree. Positive work speeds the particle up.
โŒ That adds the potential energies. Only the change, 5โˆ’25 - 2, matters.
Show solution

With Fโƒ—=โˆ‡(โˆ’ฯ†)\vec F = \nabla(-\varphi), the fundamental theorem applied to โˆ’ฯ†-\varphi gives

โˆซCFโƒ—โ‹…drโƒ—=โˆ’ฯ†(P1)+ฯ†(P0)=5โˆ’2=3.\int_C \vec F \cdot d\vec r = -\varphi(P_1) + \varphi(P_0) = 5 - 2 = 3.

The change in kinetic energy equals the work, +3+3, so kinetic plus potential energy stays constant: KE\text{KE} rises by 33 while ฯ†\varphi falls by 33.

Solved: 0 / 4