Single-Variable-Calculus · Unit 15 · Video 3 · Interactive Practice
| Rule | Formula | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| 1–2 · Sums and constants | is a constant, not a function of | |
| 3 · Additivity | , , in any order, once rule 5 is in place | |
| 4–5 · Empty and reversed intervals | rule 5 is a definition, chosen so the FTC holds in both directions | |
| 6 · Estimation | only if |
Key Insight: Integrating from to gives , and integrating that bound again gives . Each round adds one term, and each result is proved only for .
With signed integrals, holds wherever the three points sit.
Integrating the previous bound from to produces the next bound, one term longer.
💡 Challenge: starting from , find a where the new bound is false. The argument never claimed it there, because estimation needs the lower limit below the upper limit .
From , estimation concludes only when .
Problem 1 · Sums and Constants
Given: and . Find .
By rule 1 (sums) the integral splits, and by rule 2 (constants) each constant comes out:
Problem 2 · Reversed Limits
Given: and . Find .
Additivity (rule 3) with :
Reversed limits (rule 5):
Problem 3 · One More Round
Given: for . Integrate both sides from to (with ) and set . Find the lower bound this gives for .
Both sides are integrated from to with , so estimation (rule 6) keeps the inequality:
Left side: . Right side: . So
At : .
Problem 4 · Which Estimate Is Valid?
Given: for . Which inequality does estimation (rule 6) prove?
Rule 6 needs two things: on the interval, and .
(a) On , and , so , i.e. . ✓
(b) The limits run from down to , so both sides change sign: is false.
(c) On , , so the hypothesis fails; indeed .
(d) On , , so the hypothesis fails; indeed .
Solved: 0 / 4