Single-Variable-Calculus ยท Unit 2 ยท Video 3 ยท Interactive Practice

The Limit Never Lands on the Point: Easy Limits, Zero over Zero, and One-Sided Limits

IKey Formulas

FormulaNameWhat it tells you
limโกxโ†’ag(x)=g(a)\displaystyle\lim_{x \to a} g(x) = g(a)Easy limitSubstitution returns a number: 4+342+1=717\dfrac{4+3}{4^2+1} = \dfrac{7}{17}
limโกxโ†’x0f(x)โˆ’f(x0)xโˆ’x0\displaystyle\lim_{x \to x_0} \frac{f(x) - f(x_0)}{x - x_0}Difference quotientSubstituting x=x0x = x_0 gives 00\dfrac{0}{0} โ€” every ff, every time
limโกxโ†’x0+f(x)\displaystyle\lim_{x \to x_0^{+}} f(x)Right-hand limitApproach restricted to x>x0x > x_0
limโกxโ†’x0โˆ’f(x)\displaystyle\lim_{x \to x_0^{-}} f(x)Left-hand limitApproach restricted to x<x0x < x_0

Key Insight: The limit at x0x_0 is computed under the standing assumption xโ‰ x0x \neq x_0. That is why cancelling the factor xโˆ’x0x - x_0 is legal โ€” and why the value f(x0)f(x_0) never enters the calculation at all.

IIVisualization 1 โ€” Substitute, Then Read the Verdict

Substituting the limiting value either returns a number and ends the problem, or returns 00\tfrac{0}{0}.

IIIVisualization 2 โ€” Zero over Zero, Watched Closely

Both ฮ”f\Delta f and ฮ”x\Delta x shrink to zero, yet their quotient settles on โˆ’14-\tfrac{1}{4}.

๐Ÿ’ก Cancelling xโˆ’2x - 2 is legal precisely because the limit never evaluates at x=2x = 2: the quotient and โˆ’12x-\tfrac{1}{2x} agree at every point the limit actually looks at.

IVVisualization 3 โ€” Two Sides, and a Value That Is Separate

The two one-sided limits at 00 are 11 and 22, whatever value f(0)f(0) is given.

๐Ÿ’ก Whether the value at a point and the limit at that point agree is a question with a name โ€” continuity โ€” and it is where the next video begins.

VQuiz Questions

Problem 1 ยท An Easy Limit

Given: limโกxโ†’2x2+xx+1\displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{x^2 + x}{x + 1} โ€” evaluate it.

โœ… Correct! Substituting gives 4+22+1=63=2\frac{4 + 2}{2 + 1} = \frac{6}{3} = 2 โ€” a meaningful number, so the limit is finished in one line.
โŒ Not quite. 66 is the numerator at x=2x = 2. The denominator x+1x + 1 becomes 33, and the limit is the quotient of the two.
โŒ Check the numerator. The numerator is x2+x=4+2=6x^2 + x = 4 + 2 = 6, not x2=4x^2 = 4 โ€” the +โ€‰x+\,x term is substituted too.
โŒ Nothing vanishes here. At x=2x = 2 the denominator is x+1=3x + 1 = 3, not 00. The indeterminate form appears only when numerator and denominator both go to 00.
โŒ Not quite. This is an easy limit: substitute x=2x = 2 into numerator and denominator separately, then divide.
Show solution

Substitute the limiting value x=2x = 2 into numerator and denominator:

limโกxโ†’2x2+xx+1=22+22+1=63=2\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{x^2 + x}{x + 1} = \frac{2^2 + 2}{2 + 1} = \frac{6}{3} = 2

Both pieces produce ordinary numbers, and the denominator is not zero, so substitution is the answer โ€” this is exactly what "easy limit" means.

(The quotient also simplifies, since x2+xx+1=x(x+1)x+1=x\dfrac{x^2 + x}{x + 1} = \dfrac{x(x+1)}{x+1} = x for xโ‰ โˆ’1x \neq -1, which confirms the value 22. But no cancellation was needed to get it.)

Problem 2 ยท Reading the Signal 00\tfrac{0}{0}

Given: substituting x=x0x = x_0 into the difference quotient f(x)โˆ’f(x0)xโˆ’x0\dfrac{f(x) - f(x_0)}{x - x_0} produces 00\dfrac{0}{0}. What does that tell you about fโ€ฒ(x0)f'(x_0)?

โœ… Correct! 00\frac{0}{0} is a signal, not a value: it says the substitution route failed. Cancel the factor xโˆ’x0x - x_0 while xโ‰ x0x \neq x_0, then substitute.
โŒ 00\tfrac{0}{0} is not 00. Every difference quotient reads 00\frac{0}{0} on substitution โ€” including those of f(x)=xf(x) = x or f(x)=1/xf(x) = 1/x, whose derivatives are never zero.
โŒ One step too early. A derivative that exists perfectly well still reads 00\frac{0}{0} on substitution; the form appears before any computation has been done.
โŒ The form says nothing about continuity. Numerator and denominator vanish together by construction, for every ff โ€” smooth ones included.
โŒ Not quite. 00\frac{0}{0} is the starting point of a derivative computation, not its result.
Show solution

Substituting x=x0x = x_0 gives

f(x0)โˆ’f(x0)x0โˆ’x0=00\frac{f(x_0) - f(x_0)}{x_0 - x_0} = \frac{0}{0}

and this happens for every function at every point: the two differences are built to vanish together. A form that never varies can carry no information about the particular ff in front of you.

The way out is the standing assumption of the limit: xโ‰ x0x \neq x_0 throughout, so xโˆ’x0โ‰ 0x - x_0 \neq 0 and it may be cancelled. Only after the cancellation does substitution produce the number fโ€ฒ(x0)f'(x_0).

Problem 3 ยท Cancel, Then Substitute

Given: f(x)=x2f(x) = x^2 โ€” evaluate limโกxโ†’3f(x)โˆ’f(3)xโˆ’3\displaystyle\lim_{x \to 3} \frac{f(x) - f(3)}{x - 3}.

โœ… Correct! x2โˆ’9xโˆ’3=x+3\frac{x^2 - 9}{x - 3} = x + 3 for xโ‰ 3x \neq 3, and substituting into the cancelled form gives 66 โ€” which is fโ€ฒ(3)=2โ‹…3f'(3) = 2 \cdot 3.
โŒ 00\tfrac{0}{0} is not 00. It means the cancellation has not been done yet. Factor x2โˆ’9=(xโˆ’3)(x+3)x^2 - 9 = (x-3)(x+3) and divide out the xโˆ’3x - 3.
โŒ That is f(3)f(3). 99 is the height of the graph at x=3x = 3; the limit here is the slope of the tangent there.
โŒ 00\tfrac{0}{0} only says substitution failed. Since xโ‰ 3x \neq 3 throughout the limit, the factor xโˆ’3x - 3 cancels and a plain number survives.
โŒ Not quite. Write out f(x)โˆ’f(3)=x2โˆ’9f(x) - f(3) = x^2 - 9, factor it, cancel xโˆ’3x - 3, and only then substitute.
Show solution

Step 1 โ€” Write it out. f(3)=9f(3) = 9, so

f(x)โˆ’f(3)xโˆ’3=x2โˆ’9xโˆ’3\frac{f(x) - f(3)}{x - 3} = \frac{x^2 - 9}{x - 3}

Step 2 โ€” Substitution fails. At x=3x = 3 this reads 9โˆ’93โˆ’3=00\frac{9 - 9}{3 - 3} = \frac{0}{0}: no information.

Step 3 โ€” Cancel while xโ‰ 3x \neq 3.

x2โˆ’9xโˆ’3=(xโˆ’3)(x+3)xโˆ’3=x+3\frac{x^2 - 9}{x - 3} = \frac{(x - 3)(x + 3)}{x - 3} = x + 3

Step 4 โ€” Now substitute.

limโกxโ†’3(x+3)=6\lim_{x \to 3} (x + 3) = 6

So fโ€ฒ(3)=6f'(3) = 6, matching the power rule ddxx2=2x\frac{d}{dx}x^2 = 2x at x=3x = 3.

Problem 4 ยท One Side, the Other Side, and the Value

Given: the piecewise function g(x)={2xโˆ’1,x>37โˆ’x,xโ‰ค3g(x) = \begin{cases} 2x - 1, & x > 3 \\ 7 - x, & x \le 3 \end{cases} find the right-hand limit at 33 and the value g(3)g(3).

What is limโกxโ†’3+g(x)\lim_{x \to 3^{+}} g(x)?

What is g(3)g(3)?

โœ… Correct! limโกxโ†’3+g(x)=5\lim_{x \to 3^{+}} g(x) = 5 while g(3)=4g(3) = 4. The value agrees with the left-hand limit and disagrees with the right-hand one โ€” three separate computations, each done without looking at the others.
โŒ Wrong branch. 44 comes from 7โˆ’x7 - x, which is the rule for xโ‰ค3x \le 3. A right-hand limit uses only points with x>3x > 3.
โŒ Close โ€” finish the substitution. 2xโˆ’12x - 1 at x=3x = 3 is 6โˆ’16 - 1, not 66.
โŒ A jump is exactly what one-sided limits handle. Each side has its own perfectly good limit; it is the two-sided limit that fails to exist.
โŒ The value need not match a limit. 55 is the right-hand limit. To get g(3)g(3) you read the rule that covers x=3x = 3, which is 7โˆ’x7 - x because 3โ‰ค33 \le 3.
โŒ A value is never an average of the two sides. g(3)g(3) is whatever the definition assigns, and here 33 falls under the branch 7โˆ’x7 - x.
โŒ It is defined. The second branch carries xโ‰ค3x \le 3, so x=3x = 3 is covered: g(3)=7โˆ’3g(3) = 7 - 3.
โŒ Check which branch applies. For xโ†’3+x \to 3^{+} only points with x>3x > 3 are used, so the rule is 2xโˆ’12x - 1.
โŒ Check which branch contains x=3x = 3. The condition xโ‰ค3x \le 3 includes the point itself.
Show solution

Right-hand limit. xโ†’3+x \to 3^{+} restricts to x>3x > 3, where g(x)=2xโˆ’1g(x) = 2x - 1:

limโกxโ†’3+g(x)=limโกxโ†’3(2xโˆ’1)=5\lim_{x \to 3^{+}} g(x) = \lim_{x \to 3} (2x - 1) = 5

Left-hand limit. xโ†’3โˆ’x \to 3^{-} restricts to x<3x < 3, where g(x)=7โˆ’xg(x) = 7 - x:

limโกxโ†’3โˆ’g(x)=limโกxโ†’3(7โˆ’x)=4\lim_{x \to 3^{-}} g(x) = \lim_{x \to 3} (7 - x) = 4

The value. The branch 7โˆ’x7 - x carries the condition xโ‰ค3x \le 3, which includes x=3x = 3 itself, so

g(3)=7โˆ’3=4g(3) = 7 - 3 = 4

Neither limit used g(3)g(3): both were computed from points beside 33. The two one-sided limits differ, so limโกxโ†’3g(x)\lim_{x \to 3} g(x) does not exist, even though g(3)g(3) is perfectly well defined.

Solved: 0 / 4