Single-Variable-Calculus ยท Unit 2 ยท Video 3 ยท Interactive Practice
The Limit Never Lands on the Point: Easy Limits, Zero over Zero, and One-Sided Limits
IKey Formulas
Formula
Name
What it tells you
xโalimโg(x)=g(a)
Easy limit
Substitution returns a number: 42+14+3โ=177โ
xโx0โlimโxโx0โf(x)โf(x0โ)โ
Difference quotient
Substituting x=x0โ gives 00โ โ every f, every time
xโx0+โlimโf(x)
Right-hand limit
Approach restricted to x>x0โ
xโx0โโlimโf(x)
Left-hand limit
Approach restricted to x<x0โ
Key Insight: The limit at x0โ is computed under the standing assumption x๎ =x0โ. That is why cancelling the factor xโx0โ is legal โ and why the value f(x0โ) never enters the calculation at all.
IIVisualization 1 โ Substitute, Then Read the Verdict
Substituting the limiting value either returns a number and ends the problem, or returns 00โ.
IIIVisualization 2 โ Zero over Zero, Watched Closely
Both ฮf and ฮx shrink to zero, yet their quotient settles on โ41โ.
๐ก Cancelling xโ2 is legal precisely because the limit never evaluates at x=2: the quotient and โ2x1โ agree at every point the limit actually looks at.
IVVisualization 3 โ Two Sides, and a Value That Is Separate
The two one-sided limits at 0 are 1 and 2, whatever value f(0) is given.
๐ก Whether the value at a point and the limit at that point agree is a question with a name โ continuity โ and it is where the next video begins.
VQuiz Questions
Problem 1 ยท An Easy Limit
Given:xโ2limโx+1x2+xโ โ evaluate it.
โ Correct! Substituting gives 2+14+2โ=36โ=2 โ a meaningful number, so the limit is finished in one line.
โ Not quite.6 is the numerator at x=2. The denominator x+1 becomes 3, and the limit is the quotient of the two.
โ Check the numerator. The numerator is x2+x=4+2=6, not x2=4 โ the +x term is substituted too.
โ Nothing vanishes here. At x=2 the denominator is x+1=3, not 0. The indeterminate form appears only when numerator and denominator both go to 0.
โ Not quite. This is an easy limit: substitute x=2 into numerator and denominator separately, then divide.
Show solution
Substitute the limiting value x=2 into numerator and denominator:
xโ2limโx+1x2+xโ=2+122+2โ=36โ=2
Both pieces produce ordinary numbers, and the denominator is not zero, so substitution is the answer โ this is exactly what "easy limit" means.
(The quotient also simplifies, since x+1x2+xโ=x+1x(x+1)โ=x for x๎ =โ1, which confirms the value 2. But no cancellation was needed to get it.)
Problem 2 ยท Reading the Signal 00โ
Given: substituting x=x0โ into the difference quotient xโx0โf(x)โf(x0โ)โ produces 00โ. What does that tell you about fโฒ(x0โ)?
โ Correct!00โ is a signal, not a value: it says the substitution route failed. Cancel the factor xโx0โ while x๎ =x0โ, then substitute.
โ 00โ is not 0. Every difference quotient reads 00โ on substitution โ including those of f(x)=x or f(x)=1/x, whose derivatives are never zero.
โ One step too early. A derivative that exists perfectly well still reads 00โ on substitution; the form appears before any computation has been done.
โ The form says nothing about continuity. Numerator and denominator vanish together by construction, for every f โ smooth ones included.
โ Not quite.00โ is the starting point of a derivative computation, not its result.
Show solution
Substituting x=x0โ gives
x0โโx0โf(x0โ)โf(x0โ)โ=00โ
and this happens for every function at every point: the two differences are built to vanish together. A form that never varies can carry no information about the particular f in front of you.
The way out is the standing assumption of the limit: x๎ =x0โ throughout, so xโx0โ๎ =0 and it may be cancelled. Only after the cancellation does substitution produce the number fโฒ(x0โ).
โ Correct!xโ3x2โ9โ=x+3 for x๎ =3, and substituting into the cancelled form gives 6 โ which is fโฒ(3)=2โ 3.
โ 00โ is not 0. It means the cancellation has not been done yet. Factor x2โ9=(xโ3)(x+3) and divide out the xโ3.
โ That is f(3).9 is the height of the graph at x=3; the limit here is the slope of the tangent there.
โ 00โ only says substitution failed. Since x๎ =3 throughout the limit, the factor xโ3 cancels and a plain number survives.
โ Not quite. Write out f(x)โf(3)=x2โ9, factor it, cancel xโ3, and only then substitute.
Show solution
Step 1 โ Write it out.f(3)=9, so
xโ3f(x)โf(3)โ=xโ3x2โ9โ
Step 2 โ Substitution fails. At x=3 this reads 3โ39โ9โ=00โ: no information.
Step 3 โ Cancel while x๎ =3.
xโ3x2โ9โ=xโ3(xโ3)(x+3)โ=x+3
Step 4 โ Now substitute.
xโ3limโ(x+3)=6
So fโฒ(3)=6, matching the power rule dxdโx2=2x at x=3.
Problem 4 ยท One Side, the Other Side, and the Value
Given: the piecewise function
g(x)={2xโ1,7โx,โx>3xโค3โfind the right-hand limit at 3 and the value g(3).
What is limxโ3+โg(x)?
What is g(3)?
โ Correct!limxโ3+โg(x)=5 while g(3)=4. The value agrees with the left-hand limit and disagrees with the right-hand one โ three separate computations, each done without looking at the others.
โ Wrong branch.4 comes from 7โx, which is the rule for xโค3. A right-hand limit uses only points with x>3.
โ Close โ finish the substitution.2xโ1 at x=3 is 6โ1, not 6.
โ A jump is exactly what one-sided limits handle. Each side has its own perfectly good limit; it is the two-sided limit that fails to exist.
โ The value need not match a limit.5 is the right-hand limit. To get g(3) you read the rule that covers x=3, which is 7โx because 3โค3.
โ A value is never an average of the two sides.g(3) is whatever the definition assigns, and here 3 falls under the branch 7โx.
โ It is defined. The second branch carries xโค3, so x=3 is covered: g(3)=7โ3.
โ Check which branch applies. For xโ3+ only points with x>3 are used, so the rule is 2xโ1.
โ Check which branch contains x=3. The condition xโค3 includes the point itself.
Show solution
Right-hand limit.xโ3+ restricts to x>3, where g(x)=2xโ1:
xโ3+limโg(x)=xโ3limโ(2xโ1)=5
Left-hand limit.xโ3โ restricts to x<3, where g(x)=7โx:
xโ3โlimโg(x)=xโ3limโ(7โx)=4
The value. The branch 7โx carries the condition xโค3, which includes x=3 itself, so
g(3)=7โ3=4
Neither limit used g(3): both were computed from points beside3. The two one-sided limits differ, so limxโ3โg(x) does not exist, even though g(3) is perfectly well defined.