Single-Variable-Calculus Β· Unit 8 Β· Video 1 Β· Interactive Practice
A Linear Approximation Is a Proportionality: Clocks, Pitches and Rules of Thumb
IKey Formulas
Formula
Name
What it says
Tβ²βT(1+21βc2v2β)
Time dilation, linearized
Earth watch Tβ² against satellite clock T (last lecture)
TΞTββ21ββ c2v2β
Relative change
Proportional to v2/c2 with factor 21β; both sides dimensionless
dudβ(1βu)β1/2βu=0β=21β
Factor = rate of change
With u=c2v2β, Β TΞTβ=(1βu)β1/2β1 exactly
ΞvβaΞh
Rule of thumb
a = tangent slope at the base point; left out: order (Ξh)2
Key Insight: A linear approximation says small change in, proportional change out. The constant of proportionality is the derivative at the base point, and everything dropped β the curvature terms, a slightly wrong constant β is a small quantity times another small quantity.
IIVisualization 1 β The Factor 21β Is a Slope
Near u=0 the exact curve TΞTβ=(1βu)β1/2β1 merges with its tangent line of slope 21β.
IIIVisualization 2 β What the Rule Leaves Out
The tangent misses the curve by an amount of order (Ξh)2, negligible beside aΞh for small Ξh.
IVVisualization 3 β The Constant Depends on the Base Point
Pitchers at 80, 90 and 100 mph have slightly different constants; borrowing the wrong one costs only (Ξa)(Ξh).
VQuiz Questions
Problem 1 Β· The GPS Proportionality
Given:Tβ²βT(1+21βc2v2β) and, for a GPS satellite, c2v2ββ1.8Γ10β10 β find the relative change TΞTβ, where ΞT=Tβ²βT.
β Correct! The relative change is the factor 21β times c2v2β: 21β(1.8Γ10β10)=9Γ10β11.
β Close, butβ¦ that is c2v2β itself. The proportionality factor 21β still multiplies it.
β Not quite.3.6Γ10β10 is 2c2v2β. The factor is 21β, so c2v2β is halved, not doubled.
β Not quite.1+9Γ10β11 is the ratio TTβ²β. Subtracting T first leaves only the change ΞT.
β Not quite. Multiply out, subtract T, divide by T: TΞTββ21βc2v2β.
Both sides are dimensionless (time over time, speed squared over speed squared), so this number is the same in any system of units. The clocks agree to about ten significant digits.
Problem 2 Β· Where the Factor Comes From
Given: with u=c2v2β, the exact relative change is TΞTβ=(1βu)β1/2β1 β find its rate of change with respect to u at u=0.
β Correct! The slope of the tangent at the origin is 21β β exactly the proportionality factor in TΞTββ21βu.
β Close, but check the chain rule. The inner function 1βu has derivative β1, which cancels the minus sign from the power rule.
β Not quite.β23β is the new exponent, not the derivative. The power rule brings down the old exponent β21β.
β Not quite.0 is the value of TΞTβ at u=0 (the two clocks agree), not its rate of change.
β Not quite. Differentiate (1βu)β1/2 with the power rule and the chain rule, then set u=0.
Show solution
The constant β1 has derivative 0. Power rule with the chain rule:
So the factor 21β in TΞTββ21ββ c2v2β is a rate of change: the slope of the tangent line to the curve TΞTβ=(1βu)β1/2β1 at the origin.
Problem 3 Β· A Rule of Thumb for the Mound
Given: suppose that near the standard mound a pitcher's rule of thumb is ΞvβaΞh with a=0.4 mph per inch, and the mound is raised by Ξh=2.5 inches β find the predicted change in pitch speed. Then a second pitcher's own constant turns out to be 0.44 mph per inch β find how much the prediction for that pitcher changes when this constant replaces a.
Predicted change Ξv with a=0.4:
Change in the prediction when 0.44 replaces a:
β Correct!Ξvβ0.4Γ2.5=1.0 mph, and the wrong constant costs (Ξa)(Ξh)=0.04Γ2.5=0.1 mph: a small correction to an already small change.
β Not quite. A proportionality multiplies: the change out is the constant times the change in, not a quotient.
β Check the prediction. The rule is ΞvβaΞh β a product, not a sum.
β Close, butβ¦0.44Γ2.5=1.1 mph is the whole new prediction. The question asks how much it differs from the old one.
β Close, butβ¦0.04 is the change in the constant, Ξa. It still multiplies Ξh.
β Not quite. That is (Ξa)(Ξh)2. The error is first order in each small quantity: (Ξa)(Ξh).
β Check the second part. Subtract the two predictions: (0.44β0.4)Ξh.
Show solution
Prediction:
ΞvβaΞh=0.4Γ2.5=1.0Β mph.
Using the pitcher's own constanta+Ξa=0.44, so Ξa=0.04:
(a+Ξa)ΞhβaΞh=(Ξa)(Ξh)=0.04Γ2.5=0.1Β mph.
The shift in the constant is a second-order effect β a small change in a times a small change in h β so the rule ΞvβaΞh barely depends on which nearby base point it was worked out at.
Problem 4 Β· Two Effects at Once
Given: suppose two effects change a satellite clock's rate by the factors 1+x and 1+y, with relative changes x=β8Γ10β11 and y=5Γ10β10 β find the combined relative change, to the accuracy the rules of thumb give.
β Correct!(1+x)(1+y)=1+x+y+xy, and xy=β4Γ10β20 is negligible, so the relative changes simply add: x+y=4.2Γ10β10.
β Close, butβ¦ the two effects push in opposite directions: x is negative, so it partly cancels y.
β Close, butβ¦ check the sign. The larger effect, y=5Γ10β10, is positive, so x+y is positive: the negative x only partly cancels it.
β Not quite.xy is the one term the rule of thumb drops β a product of two small numbers. The sum x+y is what survives.
β Not quite. Expand (1+x)(1+y), drop the product of the two small numbers, and keep the signs.
Show solution
The combined factor is
(1+x)(1+y)=1+x+y+xy.
The cross term is tiny compared with x and y:
xy=(β8Γ10β11)(5Γ10β10)=β4Γ10β20.
So the combined relative change is
x+y=β0.8Γ10β10+5Γ10β10=4.2Γ10β10.
Small relative changes combine by addition because their products are negligible β the reason engineers can reduce each effect to its own rule of thumb and add them.