How can a 10% fall in a house price cost you 200% of the money you actually put in?
Loading…
Lehman Brothers' 16-to-1 net leverage at end-2007
Record the end-2007 figures — $19 billion net revenues, $4 billion net income, $145 billion long-term capital, 28,500 employees — next to the 16:1 net leverage ratio and the nine-month collapse.
Leverage as assets over equity, not debt over equity
Write the definition and compute both ratios for a $500,000 house: $100,000 down gives 5:1 and $25,000 down gives 20:1, recording the contrast with debt over equity.
The lender's fixed claim and the equity holder's loss
State that the lender is owed its principal plus interest whatever the house is worth, then carry the $50,000 loss from a 10% fall through to -50% at 5:1 and -200% at 20:1.
Contained volatility as the condition for safe leverage
Record that leverage is symmetric on the upside and that 20:1 held while housing rose 5-10% a year in an orderly way, and note what the pre-2008 rise in volatility did to it.