How do De Morgan's laws extend to any family of sets, and why is "pairwise disjoint" stronger than an empty intersection?
Loading…
The containments
State both containments for each and write the short element-chasing proof of each from the definitions of the indexed intersection and union.
De Morgan's Laws for an indexed family
Write and , and prove one of them by double inclusion, marking where 'for all' turns into 'there exists' under negation.
Distributive laws over an indexed family
State and , and prove the second by double inclusion with the cases and .
Disjoint versus pairwise disjoint families
Write both definitions, record that pairwise disjoint implies disjoint for a family with two different sets, and check both properties for the overlapping chain and for .