Why does assuming the negation and reaching an absurdity prove a statement, and how do you negate a "for each, if P then Q" claim correctly?
Loading…
The tautology and contradiction
Write the two-row truth table for , , and , and record the definitions of tautology and contradiction it illustrates.
The tautology
Build its truth table with the contradiction always false, state the proof method it justifies, and note that is logically equivalent to .
Negating a conditional:
Verify the equivalence with a four-row truth table and record what a proof by contradiction of assumes at its start.
Repairing and negating the claim
Give the counterexample , add the hypothesis , and write the full negation of the repaired statement with its quantifier changed to there exists.