Why is 'is a multiple of' not an equivalence relation, while a − b ∈ ℤ on the rationals is?
Loading…
Definition of an equivalence relation
State the definition for a relation on a nonempty set and the phrase " is equivalent to ".
Logical form of each property
Record that reflexivity is a universal statement proved for an arbitrary element, while symmetry and transitivity are conditionals proved by assuming the hypothesis.
The relation "is a multiple of" on
Prove reflexivity and transitivity with , , and give the witness , against symmetry.
on
Test the pairs and , then write the three proofs using , negation and .